An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 400-411

  Zhang, Chi ^a   Liu, Song ^a   Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Decoy sets; Ideal gas reference state; Knowledge based potential; Residue level potential

Indexed keywords

POLYPEPTIDE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATOM; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIMERIZATION; ENERGY; GAS; GENOMICS; HYDROGEN BOND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REDUCTION;

AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOMICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 1642534609     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03348304     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bahar, I. and Jernigan, R. 1997. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J. Mol. Biol. 266: 195-214.
2. Baker, D. and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
3. Betancourt, M.R. and Thirumalai, D. 1999. Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci. 8: 361-369.
4. Bonneau, R., Strauss, C., Rohl, C., Chivian, D., Bradley, P., Malmstrom, L., Robertson, T., and Baker, D. 2002. De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 322: 65-78.
5. Bowie, J.U. and Eisenberg, D. 1994. An evolutionary approach to folding small α-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 4436-4440.
6. Bryant, S.H. and Lawrence, C.E. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 16: 92-112.
7. Chhajer, M. and Crippen, G.M. 2002. A protein folding potential that places the native states of a large number of proteins near a local minimum. BMC Struct. Biol. 2: 4.
8. Colovos, C. and Yeates, T.O. 1993. Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interaction. Protein Sci. 2: 1511-1519.
9. Dill, K.A. and Chan, H.S. 1997. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4: 10-19.
10. Dobson, C.M., Sali, A., and Karplus, M. 1998. Protein folding: A perspective from theory and experiment. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 198: 868-893.
11. Eisenberg, D., Lüthy, R., and Bowie, J.U. 1997. VERIFY3D: Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profile. Methods Enzymol. 277: 396-404.
12. Elock, A. and McCammon, J. 2001. Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98: 2990-2994.
13. Eyrich, V.A., Standley, D.M., and Friesner, R.A. 1999. Prediction of protein tertiary to low resolution: Performance for a large and structurally diverse test set. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 725-742.
14. Feig, M. and Brooks III, C.L. 2002. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions. Proteins 49: 232-245.
15. Glaser, F., Sternberg, D., Vakser, I., and Ben-Tal, N. 2001. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 43: 89-102.
16. Godzik, A., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 1995. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci. 4: 2107-2117.
17. Gray, J., Moughon, S., Kortemme, T., Furman, O., Misura, K., Morozov, A., and Baker, D. 2003. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins 52: 118-122.
18. Hendlich, M., Lackner, P., Weitckus, S., Floeckner, H., Froschauer, R., Gottsbacher, K., Casari, G., and Sippl, M.J. 1990. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 167-180.
19. Hinds, D. and Levitt, M. 1992. A lattice model for protein structure prediction at low resolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 89: 2536-2540.
20. Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1992. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1: 409-417.
21. Honig, B. 1999. Protein folding: From the Levinthal paradox to structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 293: 283-293.
22. Janin, J. and Seraphin, B. 2003. Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13: 383-388.
23. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
24. Keasar, C. and Levitt, M. 2003. A novel approach to decoy set generation: Designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics. J. Mol. Biol. 329: 159-174.
25. Kihara, D., Lu, H., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2001. TOUCHSTONE: An ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98: 10125-10130.
26. Kihara, D., Zhang, Y., Lu, H., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2002. Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: Application to the mycoplasma genitalium genome. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99: 5993-5998.
27. Kocher, J.-P.A., Rooman, M., and Wodak, S. 1994. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J. Mol. Biol. 235: 1598-1613.
28. Kortemme, T., Morozov, A., and Baker, D. 2003. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 326: 1239-1259.
29. Lazaridis, T. and Karplus, M. 2000. Effective energy function for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 139-145.
30. Levitt, M. 1976. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 104: 59-107.
31. Li, X., Hu, C., and Liang, J. 2003. Simplicial edge representation of protein structures and α contact potential with confidence measure. Proteins 53: 792-805.
32. Liu, S., Zhang, C., Zhou, H., and Zhou, Y. 2004. A physical reference state unifies the structure-derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding. Proteins (in press)
33. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. 2001. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232.
34. Lu, H., Lu, L., and Skolnick, J. 2003. Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. Biophys. J. 84: 1895-1901.
35. McConkey, B.J., Sobolev, V., and Edelman, M. 2002. Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 3215-3220.
36. Melo, F., Sanchez, R., and Sali, A. 2002. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 430: 430-448.
37. Mintseris, J. and Weng, Z. 2003. Atomic contact vectors in protein-protein recognition. Proteins 53: 629-639.
38. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
39. -. 1999. An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 36: 357-369.
40. Moont, G., Gabb, H., and Sternberg, M. 1999. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins 35: 364-373.
41. Nanias, M., Chincho, M., Pillardy, J., Ripoll, D., and Scheraga, H. 2003. Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100: 1706-1710.
42. Ofran, Y. and Rost, B. 2003. Analyzing six types of protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 325: 377-387.
43. Panchenko, A.R., Marchler-Bauer, A., and Bryant, S.H. 2000. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 296: 1319-1331.
44. Park, B. and Levitt, M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 367-392.
45. Pillardy, J., Czaplewski, C., Liwo, A., Lec, J., Ripoll, D.R., Kamierkiewicz R., Oldziej, S., Wedemeyer, W.J., Gibson, K.D., Arnautova, Y.A., et al. 2001. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 2329-2333.
46. Ponstingl, H., Henrick, K., and Thornton, J. 2000. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins 41: 47-57.
47. Samudrala, R. and Moult, J. 1998. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 895-916.
48. Samudrala, R., Xia, Y., Levitt, M., and Huang, E. 1999. A combined approach for ab initio construction of low resolution protein tertiary structures from sequence. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 4: 505-506.
49. Schonhrun, J., Wedemeyer, W., and Baker, D. 2002. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 348-354.
50. Simons, K.T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E., and Baker, D. 1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 209-225.
51. Simons, K., Bonneau, R., Ruczinski, I., and Baker, D. 1999. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 37(S3): 171-176.
52. Simons, K., Strauss, C., and Baker, D. 2001. Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics. J. Mol. Biol. 306: 1191-1199.
53. Sippl, M.J. 1990. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 213: 859-883.
54. -. 1993. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362.
55. Tanaka, S. and Scheraga, H.A. 1976. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 9: 945-950.
56. Thomas, P.D. and Dill, K.A. 1996. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J. Mol. Biol. 257: 457-469.
57. Tobi, D. and Elber, R. 2000. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: Results from linear optimization. Proteins 41: 40-46.
58. Tsai, J., Bonneau, R., Morozov, A.V., Kuhlman, B., Rohl, C.A., and Baker, D. 2003. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction. Proteins 53: 76-87.
59. Vajda, S., Vakser, I., Sternberg, M., and Janin, J. 2002. Modeling of protein interactions in genomes. Proteins 47: 444-446.
60. Vendruscolo, M., Mirny, L., Shakhnoich, E.I., and Domany, E. 2000. Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: Perception and Z score. Proteins 41: 192-201.
61. Vijayakumar, M. and Zhou, H.-X. 2000. Prediction of residue-residue pair frequencies in proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 104: 9755-9764.
62. Xia, Y., Huang, E.S., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2000. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 171-185.
63. Zacharias, M. 2003. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci. 12: 1271-1282.
64. Zhang, C. and Kim, S. 2000. Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 2550-2555.
65. Zhang, Y., Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 2003. TOUCHSTONE II: A new approach to ab initio structure prediction. Biophys. J. 85: 1145-1164.
66. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11: 2714-2726. Corrections 12: 2121 (2003).
67. Zhou, H. and Zhou, Y. 2002. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11: 2714-2726. Corrections 12: 2121 (2003).
68. -. 2004. Quantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability. Proteins (in press)