Prediction of protein tertiauy structure to low resolution: Performance for a large and structurally diverse test set

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 288, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 725-742

  Eyrich, Volker A ^a   Standley, Daron M ^a   Friesner, Richard A ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Global optimization; Metropolis criterion; Protein folding; Reduced model; Simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 0032588985     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2702     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abola E. E., Bernstein F. C., Bryant S. H., Koetzle T. F., Weng J. Protein Data Bank. Crystallographic Databases: Information Content, Software Systems, Scientific Applications. 1987;Data Commission of the International Union of Crystallography, Bonn, Cambridge, Chester. p. 107-132.
2. Berstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J. B., Meyer E. F. Jr, Brice M. D., Rodjers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542.
3. Casari G., Sippl M. J. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential - hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular-proteins is able to identify native folds. J. Mol. Biol. 224:1992;725-732.
4. Clark D. E., Westhead D. R. Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 10:1996;337-358.
5. Dandekar T., Argos P. Identifying the tertiary fold of small proteins with different topologies from sequence and secondary structure using the genetic algorithm and extended criteria specific for strand regions. J. Mol. Biol. 256:1996;645-660.
6. Dandekar T., Argos P. Applying experimental data to protein fold prediction with the genetic algorithm. Protein Eng. 10:1997;877-893.
7. Dandekar T., Konig R. Computational methods for the prediction of protein folds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1343:1997;1-15.
8. Erman B., Bahar I., Jemigan R. L. Equilibrium states of rigid bodies with multiple interaction sites: application to protein helices. J. Chem. Phys. 107:1997;2046-2059.
9. Eyrich V. A., Standley D. M., Felts A. K., Friesner R. A. Protein tertiary structure prediction using a branch and bound algorithm. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35:1999;41-57.
10. Gunn J. R., Monge A., Friesner R. A., Marshall C. H. Hierarchical algorithm for computer modeling of protein tertiary structure-folding of myoglobin to 6. 2 Ångstrom resolution. J. Phys. Chem. 98:1994;702-711.
11. Hobohm U., Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci. 3:1994;522-524.
12. Huang E. S., Subbiah S., Tsai J., Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;716-725.
13. Kitchen D. B., Hirata F., Westbrook J. D., Levy R., Kofke D., Yarmush M. Conserving energy during molecular-dynamics simulations of water, proteins, and proteins in water. J. Comput. Chem. 11:1990;1169-1180.
14. Li Z., Scheraga H. A. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;6611-6615.
15. Mumenthaler C., Braun W. Predicting the helix packing of globular-proteins by self- correcting distance geometry. Protein Sci. 4:1995;863-871.
16. Odonoghue S. I., Nilges M. Tertiary structure prediction using mean-force potentials and internal energy functions: successful prediction for coiled-coil. Fold. Design. 2:1997;S47-S52.
17. Ortiz A. R., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;419-448.
18. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70 % accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;584-599.
19. Rost B., Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994;55-72.
20. Simons K. T., Kooperberg C., Huang E., Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268:1997;209-225.
21. Skolnick J., Kolinski A., Ortiz A. R. MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 265:1997;217-241.
22. Standley D., Gunn J., Friesner R., McDermott A. Tertiary structure prediction of mixed α/β proteins via energy minimization. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 33:1998;240-252.
23. Standley D. M., Eyrich V. A., Felts A. K., Friesner R. A., McDermott A. E. A branch and bound algorithm for protein structure refinement from sparse NMR data sets. J. Mol. Biol. 285:1999;1689-1708.
24. Still W. C., Tempczyk A., Hawley R. C., Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;6127-6129.
25. Sun S. J. Reduced representation model of protein-structure prediction-statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci. 2:1993;762-785.
26. Sun S. J., Thomas P. D., Dill K. A. A simple protein-folding algorithm using a binary code and secondary structure constraints. Protein Eng. 8:1995;769-778.