Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1895-1901

  Lu, Hui ^a,c   Lu, Long ^a,d   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a,b  

^a DONALD DANFORTH PLANT SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DIMER; MONOMER; POLYMER;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ATOM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA BASE; GENOMICS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRENGTH;

EID: 0037340493     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74997-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berman, H. M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
2. Bonneau, R., and D. Baker. 2001. Ab initio protein structure prediction: progress and prospects. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:173-189.
3. Conte, L., C. Chothia, and J. Janin. 1999. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285:2177-2198.
4. Glaser, F., D. Steinberg, I. Vakser, and N. Ben-Tal. 2001. Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins. 43:89-102.
5. Elcock, A., and A. McCammon. 2001. Identification of protein oligomerization states analysis of interface conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2990-2994.
6. Elcock, A., D. Sept, and A. McCammon. 2001. Computer simulation of protein-protein interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B. 105:1504-1518.
7. Hu, Z., B. Ma, H. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov. 2000. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins. 39:331-342.
8. Jiang, L., Y. Gao, F. Mao, Z. Liu, and L. Lai. 2002. Potential of mean force for protein-protein interaction studies. Proteins. 46:190-196.
9. Jones, S., and J. Thornton. 1996. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:13-20.
10. Kihara, D., H. Lu, A. Kolinski, and J. Skolnick. 2001. TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:10125-10130.
11. Landgraf, R., I. Xenarios, and D. Eisenberg. 2001. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 307:1487-1502.
12. Lu, L., H. Lu, and J. Skolnick. 2002. MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by muttimeric threading. Proteins. 49:350-364.
13. Lu, H., and J. Skolnick. 2001. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins. 44:223-232.
14. Ma, B., H. Wolfson, and R. Nossinov. 2001. Protein functional epitopes: hot spots, dynamics and combinatorial libraries. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:364-369.
15. Moont, G., H. Gabb, and M. Sternberg. 1999. Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. 35:364-373.
16. Pazos, F., M. Helmer-Citterich, G. Ausiello, and A. Valencia. 1997. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 271:511-523.
17. Ponstingl, H., K. Henrick, and J. M. Thornton, 2000. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins. 41:47-57.
18. Robert, C., and J. Janin. 1998. A soft, mean-field potential derived from crystal contacts for predicting protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 283:1037-1047.
19. Sheinerman, F., R. Norel, and B. Honig. 2000. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:153-159.
20. Skolnick, J., and D. Kihara. 2001. Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR - a new approach to threading. Proteins. 42:319-331.
21. Skolnick, J., A. Kolinski, and A. Ortiz. 2000. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins. 38:3-16.
22. Smith, G., and M. Sternberg. 2002. Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:28-35.
23. Vajda, S., M. Sippl, and J. Novotny. 1997. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr. Opin. Sruct. Biol. 7:222-238.
24. Valencia, A., and F. Pazos. 2002. Computational methods of the prediction of protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:368-373.
25. Zhang, C., J. Chen, and C. DeLisi, 1999. Protein-protein recognition: exploring the energy funnels near the binding sites. Proteins. 34:255-267.