Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 232-245

  Feig, Michael ^a   Brooks III, Charles L ^a  

^a SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Implicit solvent; Minimization protocol; Scoring

Indexed keywords

GENE PRODUCT; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BINDING COMPETITION; CASP4 PREDICTION; COMPUTER PREDICTION; ENERGY METABOLISM; PARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SOLVATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOLVENTS;

EID: 0036836611     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10217     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Head-Gordon T, Wooley JC. Computational challenges in structural and functional genomics. IBM Systems J 2001;40:265-296.
2. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): round IV. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:2-7.
3. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Functional inferences from blind ab initio protein structure predictions. J Struct Biol 2001;134:186-190.
4. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:139-145.
5. Srinivasan J, Miller J, Kollman PA, Case DA. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of RNA hairpin loops and helices. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1998;16:671-682.
6. Lee MR, Duan Y, Kollman PA. Use of MM-PB/SA in estimating the free energies of proteins: application to native, intermediates, and unfolded villin headpiece. Proteins 2000;39:309-316.
7. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B. Accurate calculation of hydration free-energies using macroscopic solvent models. J Phys Chem 1994;98:1978-1988.
8. Lee MR, Kollman PA. Free-energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between x-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure. Predict Struct 2001;9:905-916.
9. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley R, Hendrickson T. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127-6129.
10. Hawkins G, Cramer C, Truhlar D. Pairwise descreening of solute charges from a dielectric medium. Chem Phys Lett 1995;246:122-129.
11. Ghosh A, Rapp CS, Friesner RA. Generalized born model based on a surface integral formulation. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:10983- 10990.
12. Qiu D, Shenkin PS, Hollinger FP, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997;101:3005-3014.
13. Dominy BN, Brooks CL III. Development of a generalized born model parametrization for proteins and nucleic acids. J Phys Chem B 1999;103:3765-3773.
14. Lee MS, Salsbury FR Jr, Brooks CL III. Novel generalized born methods. J Chem Phys 2002;116:10606-10614.
15. Lee MS, Salsbury FR, Feig M, Brooks CL III. Running molecular dynamics simulations successfully with generalized born implicit solvent. In preparation.
16. Schaefer M, Karplus M. A comprehensive analytical treatment of continuum electrostatics J Phys Chem 1996;100:1578-1599.
17. Srinivasan J, Cheatham TE, Cieplak P, Kollman PA, Case DA. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of DNA, RNA, and phosphoramidate-DNA helices. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:9401-9409.
18. Wesson L, Eisenberg D. Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Protein Sci 1992;1:227-235.
19. Klepeis JL, Floudas CA. Comparative study of global minimum energy conformations of hydrated peptides. J Comp Chem 1999;20: 636-654.
20. Ferrara P, Apostolakis J, Caflish A. Evaluation of a fast implicit solvent model for molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2002;46:24-33.
21. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J Mol Biol 1998;288:477-487.
22. Dominy BN, Brooks CL III. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J Comp Chem 2001;23:147-160.
23. Sohl JL, Jaswal SS, Agard DA. Unfolded conformations of α-lytic protease are more stable than its native state Nature 1998;395:817-819.
24. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
25. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:171-176.
26. Tobi D, Elber R. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: results from linear optimization. Proteins 2000;41:40-46.
27. Gatchell DW, Sheldon D, Vajda S, Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions. Proteins 2000;41:518-534.
28. Lu H, Skolnick J. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 2001;44:223-232.
29. Vorobjev YN, Hermans J. Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability. Protein Sci 2001;10:2498-2506.
30. Murzin A, Hubbard TJP. Prediction targets of CASP4. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:8-12.
31. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Pazos F, Valencia A, Rost B, Ortiz AR, Dunbrack J, Roland L. CAFASP2: the second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:171-183.
32. Feig M, Rotkiewicz P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J, Brooks CLI. Accurate reconstruction of all-atom protein representations from side-chain-based low-resolution models. Proteins 2000;41:86-97.
33. Dunbrack RL Jr, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent Rotamer Library for Proteins: application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993;230:543-574.
34. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4: 187-217.
35. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack JD, Evanseck MJ, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
36. Sharp K, Nicholls A, Friedman R, Honig B. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry 1991;40:9686-9697.
37. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of protein J Mol Biol 1982:157:105-132
38. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
39. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:22-29.
40. Price DJ, Brooks CLI. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comp Chem 2002;23: p 1045-1057.
41. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117:5179-5197.
42. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236.
43. Bryngelson JD, Wolynes PG. Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84: 7524-7528.
44. Karplus M. The Levinthal paradox: yesterday and today. Fold Design 1997;2:S69-S75.
45. Lee MR, Baker D, Kollman PA. 2.1 and 1.8 Å average Cα RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and S15. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123:1040-1046.
46. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice model and interaction scheme. Proteins 1994;18:338-352.
47. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model. Proteins 1998;32:475-494.
48. Fiser A, Feig M, Brooks CL III, Sali A. Evolution and physics in comparative protein structure modeling. Acc Chem Res 2002;35: 413-421.