Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 171-176

  Simons, Kim T ^a   Bonneau, Rich ^a   Ruczinski, Ingo ^b   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical assessment of structure prediction experiment (CASP); Fragment assembly; Knowledge based scoring functions; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

HELICASE; PROTEIN; RIBOSOME PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISULFIDE BOND; ELECTRICITY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; ALGORITHM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; FORECASTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; FORECASTING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0032612579     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<171::AID-PROT21>3.0.CO;2-Z     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Simons KT, Ruczinki I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
3. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993;232:584-599.
4. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci 1996;5:947-955.
5. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
6. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:11158-11162.
7. Holm L, Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:478-480.
8. Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1998.
9. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Reinhardt A, Fidelis K, Hubbard TJ. Numerical criteria for the evaluation of ab initio predictions of protein structure. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:140-150.
10. Weigelt J, Brown SE, Miles CS, Dixon NE, Otting G. NMR structure of the n-terminal domain of E. coli DNAB helicase: implications for structure rearrangements in the helicase hexamer and its biological function, to be published.
11. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Bryant SH. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:377-385.
12. DeBeer T, Carter RE, Lobel-Rice KE, Sorkin A, Overdum M. Structure and Asn-Pro-Phe binding pocket of the Eps 15 homology domain. Science 1998;281:1357-1360.
13. Rhee S, Martin RG, Rosner JL, Davies DR. A novel DNA-binding motif in MarA: the first structure for an AraC family transcriptional activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:10413-10418.
14. Kraulis PJ. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 1991;24:946-950.
15. Merritt EA, Bacon DJ. Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:505-524.