Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 325, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 377-387

  Ofran, Yanay ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug design; Protein complexes; Protein folding; Protein interface; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

OLIGOMER; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

HOMO;

EID: 0037229456     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01223-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Xenarios, I., Rice, D. W., Salwinski, L., Baron, M. K., Marcotte, E. M. & Eisenberg, D. (2000). DIP: The database of interacting proteins. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 289-291.
2. Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J., Meyer, E. F., Jr, Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R. et al. (1977). The Protein Data Bank. A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. Eur. J. Biochem. 80, 319-324.
3. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gillliland, G., Bhat, T. N., Weissig, H. et al. (2000). The Protein Data Bank. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 235-242.
4. Bairoch, A. & Apweiler, R. (2000). The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucl. Acids Res. 28, 45-48.
5. Jones, S. & Thornton, J. M. (1996). Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13-20.
6. Jones, S. & Thornton, J. M. (1997). Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 121-132.
7. Keskin, O., Bahar, I., Badretdinov, A. Y., Ptitsyn, O. B. & Jernigan, R. L. (1998). Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and intermolecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci. 7, 2578-2586.
8. Glaser, F., Steinberg, D. M., Vakser, I. A. & Ben-Tal, N. (2001). Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 43, 89-102.
9. McCoy, A. J., Chandana Epa, V. & Colman, P. M. (1997). Electrostatic complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 268, 570-584.
10. Lo Conte, L., Chothia, C. & Janin, J. (1999). The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285, 2177-2198.
11. Sheinerman, F. B., Norel, R. & Honig, B. (2000). Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 153-159.
12. Bogan, A. A. & Thorn, K. S. (1998). Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280, 1-9.
13. Jones, S., Marin, A. & Thornton, J. M. (2000). Protein domain interfaces: Characterization and comparison with oligomeric protein interfaces. Protein Eng. 13, 77-82.
14. Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M. & Sakaki, Y. (2001). A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
15. Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R. et al. (2000). A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403, 623-627.
16. Jernigan, R. L. & Bahar, I. (1996). Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 6, 195-209.
17. Bahar, I. & Jernigan, R. L. (1997). Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J. Mol. Biol. 266, 195-214.
18. Bahar, I. & Jernigan, R. L. (1996). Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 6, 195-209.
19. Nayal, M., Hitz, B. C. & Honig, B. (1999). GRASS: A server for the graphical representation and analysis of structures. Protein Sci. 8, 676-679.
20. Fetrow, J. S., Siew, N., Di Gennaro, J. A., Martinez-Yamout, M., Dyson, H. J. & Skolnick, J. (2001). Genomic-scale comparison of sequence- and structure-based methods of function prediction: Does structure provide additional insight? Protein Sci. 10, 1005-1014.
21. Royall, R. M. (1986). The effect of sample size on the meaning of significance tests. The American Statistician, 40, 313-315.
22. Xu, D., Lin, S. L. & Nussinov, R. (1997). Protein binding versus protein folding: The role of hydrophilic bridges in protein associations. J. Mol. Biol. 265, 68-84.
23. Zhou, H. X. & Shan, Y. (2001). Prediction of protein interaction sites from sequence profile and residue neighbor list. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 44, 336-343.
24. Chakrabarti, P. & Janin, J. (2002). Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 47, 334-343.
25. Hendlich, M., Lackner, P., Weitckus, S., Flöckner, H., Froschauer, R., Gottsbacher, K. et al. (1990). Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 216, 167-180.
26. Prlic, A., Domingues, F. S. & Sippl, M. J. (2000). Structure-derived substitution matrices for alignment of distantly related sequences. Protein Eng. 13, 545-550.
27. Sippl, M. J. (1995). Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5, 229-235.
28. Moont, G., Gabb, H. A. & Sternberg, M. J. (1999). Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 35, 364-373.
29. Aloy, P. & Russell, R. B. (2002). Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 5896-5901.
30. Aloy, P., Querol, E., Aviles, F. X. & Sternberg, M. J. (2001). Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: Applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 395-408.
31. Polticelli, F., Ascenzi, P., Bolognesi, M. & Honig, B. (1999). Structural determinants of trypsin affinity and specificity for cationic inhibitors. Protein Sci. 8, 2621-2629.
32. Schueler, O. & Margalit, H. (1995). Conservation of salt bridges in protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 248, 125-135.
33. Honig, B. & Nicholls, A. (1995). Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science, 268, 1144-1149.
34. Jones, S. & Thornton, J. M. (1997). Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 133-143.
35. Rost, B. (2002). Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J. Mol. Biol. 318, 595-608.
36. Rost, B. (1999). Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 12, 85-94.
37. Henrick, K. & Thornton, J. M. (1998). PQS: A protein quaternary structure file server. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 358-361.
38. Elcock, A. H. & McCammon, J. A. (2001). Identification of protein oligomerization states by analysis of interface conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 2990-2994.
39. Efron, B., Halloran, E. & Holmes, S. (1996). Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13429-13434.
40. Lin, J. (1991). Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 37, 145-151.
41. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech. J. 27, 379-423; see also pp. 623-656.
42. Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R. F. (1982). A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132.
43. Yang, A. S. & Honig, B. (2000). An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance. J. Mol. Biol. 301, 665-678.
44. Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. (1983). Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
45. Rost, B. & Sander, C. (1994). Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19, 55-72.