An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 357-369

  Miyazawa, Sanzo ^a,b   Jernigan, Robert L ^b  

^a GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D 1D; Optimal protein sequence; Protein inverse folding; Protein sequence design; Protein sequence threading; Scoring function; Sequence structure compatibility; Statistical potentials

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARTICLE; ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033566614     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990815)36:3<357::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Novotny J, Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models; implications for structure predictions. J Mol Biol 1984;177:787-818.
2. Novotny J, Rashin AA, Bruccoleri RE. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins 1988;4:19-30.
3. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
4. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floechner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbachner K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models; the calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
5. Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
6. Sippl MJ, Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins 1992;13:258-271.
7. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A New Approach to Protein Fold Recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
8. Godzik A, Skolnick J. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to super-secondary and tertiary structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:12098-12102.
9. Nishikawa K, Matsuo Y. Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3D-1D compatibility and detecting weak homologies. Prot Eng 1993;6:811-820.
10. Kocher J-PA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors Influencing the Ability of Knowledge-based Potentials to Identify Native Sequence-Structure Matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
11. Matsuo Y, Nakamura H, Nishikawa K. Detection of protein 3D-1D compatibility characterized by the evaluation of side-chain packing and electrostatic interactions. J Biochem 1995;118:137-148.
12. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996; 258:367-392.
13. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
14. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. A Scoring function with structure-dependent gap penalties for identifying protein sequence-structure compatibilities. Submitted, 1999.
15. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen T. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii.
16. Moult J, Hubbard T, Bryant SH, Fidelis K, Pedersen T. Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP): Round II. Proteins 1997;supplement 1:2-6.
17. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Prot Sci 1997;6:1467-1481.
18. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
19. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256: 623-644.
20. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Substitution mutants and the extent of local compactness in the denatured state. Prot Eng 1994;7:1209-1220.
21. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
22. Thomas PD, Dill K. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
23. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264: 1164-1179.
24. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Self-consistent estimation of interresidue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins 1999;34:49-68.
25. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
26. Sippl MJ. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structure. J Comp-Aided Mol Design 1993;7:473-501.
27. Chothia C. One thousand families for the molecular biologist Nature 1992;357:543-544.
28. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 1994;372:631-634.
29. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI. Pseudodihedrals: simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci 1994;3:1570-1581.
30. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Evaluation of short-range interactions as secondary structure energies for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999;36:347-356.
31. Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Statistical mechanics of simple models of protein folding and design. Biophys J 1997;73:3192-3210.
32. Shakhnovich EI. Protein design: a perspective from simple tractable models. Folding & Design 1998;3:R45-R58.
33. Mirny L, Abkevich V, Shakhnovich EI. Universality and diversity of the protein folding scenarios: a comprehensive analysis with the aid of lattice model. Folding & Design 1996;1:103-116.
34. Seno F, Vendruscolo M, Maritan A, Banavar J. Optimal protein design procedure. Phys Rev Lett 1996;77:1901-1904.
35. Deutsch JM, Kurosky T. New algorithm for protein design. Phys Rev Lett 1996;76:323-326.
36. Morrissey M, Shakhnovich EI. Design of proteins with selected thermal properties. Folding & Design 1996;1:391-406.
37. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1997;112:535-542.
38. Orengo CA, Flores TP, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. Identification and classification of protein fold families. Prot Eng 1993;6:485-500.
39. Godzik A, Koliński A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4:2107-2117.
40. Covell DG, Jernigan RL. Conformations of folded proteins in restricted spaces. Biochemistry 1990;29:3287-3294.
41. Altuvia Y, Schueler O, Margalit H. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J Mol Biol 1995;249:244-250.