Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 383-388

  Janin, Joël ^a   Séraphin, Bertrand ^b  

^a LABORATOIRE D ENZYMOLOGIE ET BIOCHIMIE STRUCTURALES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; GENOMICS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STOICHIOMETRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0038169958     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00064-2     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 340:1989;245-246.
2. Yates JR III: Mass spectrometry. From genomics to proteomics. Trends Genet 2000, 16:5-8.
3. Sobott F., Robinson C.V. Protein complexes gain momentum. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 12:2002;729-734.
4. Rigaut G., Shevchenko A., Rutz B., Wilm M., Mann M., Séraphin B. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat Biotechnol. 17:1999;1030-1032.
5. Ho Y., Gruhler A., Heilbut A., Bader G.D., Moore L., Adams S.L., Millar A., Taylor P., Bennett K., Boutilier K.et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 415:2002;180-183 A high-throughput study of protein interaction in yeast relying on immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry.
6. Gavin A.C., Bosche M., Krause R., Grandi P., Marzioch M., Bauer A., Schultz J., Rick J.M., Michon A.M., Cruciat C.M.et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 415:2002;141-147 A high-quality analysis of hundreds of protein complexes in yeast using the TAP method and mass spectrometry, providing, for the first time, an overview of protein association in a eukaryotic cell. Results also demonstrate the conservation of protein complexes from yeast to human.
7. Goebl M.G., Petes T.D. Most of the yeast genomic sequences are not essential for cell growth and division. Cell. 46:1986;983-992.
8. Puig O., Caspary F., Rigaut G., Rutz B., Bouveret E., Bragado-Nilsson E., Wilm M., Séraphin B. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods. 24:2001;218-229 This manuscript describes an efficient and original method for complex purification that is particularly well adapted to proteomic studies.
9. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR III: Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:242-247.
10. Uetz P., Giot L., Cagney G., Mansfield T.A., Judson R.S., Knight J.R., Lockshon D., Narayan V., Srinivasan M., Pochart P.et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
11. Ito T., Chiba T., Ozawa R., Yoshida M., Hattori M., Sakaki Y. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:2001;4569-4574.
12. Chen C.Y., Gherzi R., Ong S.E., Chan E.L., Raijmakers R., Pruijn G.J., Stoecklin G., Moroni C., Mann M., Karin M. AU binding proteins recruit the exosome to degrade ARE-containing mRNAs. Cell. 107:2001;451-464.
13. Westermarck J., Weiss C., Saffrich R., Kast J., Musti A.M., Wessely M., Ansorge W., Séraphin B., Wilm M., Valdez B.C., Bohmann D. The DEXD/H-box RNA helicase RHII/Gu is a co-factor for c-Jun-activated transcription. EMBO J. 21:2002;451-460.
14. Estevez A.M., Kempf T., Clayton C. The exosome of Trypanosoma brucei. EMBO J. 20:2001;3831-3839.
15. Smith G.R., Sternberg M.J.E. Prediction of protein interactions by docking methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 12:2002;28-35.
16. Camacho C.J., Vajda S. Protein-protein association kinetics and protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 12:2002;36-40.
17. Valencia A., Pazos F. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 12:2002;368-373.
18. Wodak S.J., Janin J. Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. Adv Protein Chem. 61:2002;9-73.
19. Halperin I., Ma B., Wolfson H., Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins. 47:2002;409-443.
20. Pazos F., Valencia A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins. 47:2002;219-227.
21. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M: Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 2003, (suppl 1):in press.
22. Fernando-Recio J., Totrov M., Abagyan R. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci. 11:2002;280-291.
23. Chen R., Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins. 47:2002;281-294.
24. Heifetz A., Katchalski-Katzir E., Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 11:2002;571-587.
25. Tovchigrechko A., Wells C.A., Vakser I.A. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci. 11:2002;1888-1896.
26. Janin J. Welcome to CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins. 47:2002;257.
27. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Ten Eyck L, Sternberg M, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ: CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003, (suppl 1):in press.
28. Mendez R, Leplae R, de Maria L, Wodak SJ: Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003, (suppl 1):in press.
29. Strynadka N.C., Eisenstein M., Katchalski-Katzir E., Shoichet B.K., Kuntz I.D., Abagyan R., Totrov M., Janin J., Cherfils J., Zimmerman F.et al. Molecular docking programs successfully predict the binding of a beta-lactamase inhibitory protein to TEM-1 beta-lactamase. Nat Struct Biol. 3:1996;233-239.
30. Dixon JS: Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section. Proteins 1997, (suppl 2):198-204.
31. Desmyter A., Spinelli S., Payan F., Lauwereys M., Wyns L., Muyldermans S., Cambillau C. Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase. Inhibition and versatility of binding topology. J Biol Chem. 277:2002;23645-23650 The X-ray structures of three VHH domains of a single-chain antibody bound to different epitopes on the same antigen show remarkable differences in the VHH domains and the way they recognize their epitope.
32. Barbey-Martin C., Gigant B., Bizebard T., Calder L.J., Wharton S.A., Skehel J.J., Knossow M. An antibody that prevents the hemagglutinin low pH transition. Virology. 294:2002;70-74 The X-ray structure of the flu virus hemagglutinin trimer in complex with a monoclonal antibody. The antibody binds at the top of the trimer, bridging two subunits and preventing their dissociation, which is a necessary step in the low pH transition of the hemagglutinin.
33. Thouvenin E., Schoehn G., Rey F., Petitpas I., Mathieu M., Vaney M.C., Cohen J., Kohli E., Pothier P., Hewat E. Antibody inhibition of the transcriptase activity of the rotavirus DLP: a structural view. J Mol Biol. 307:2001;161-172.
34. Sundberg E.J., Li H., Llera A.S., McCormick J.K., Tormo J., Schlievert P.M., Karjalainen K., Mariuzza R.A. Structures of two streptococcal superantigens bound to TCR beta chains reveal diversity in the architecture of T cell signaling complexes. Structure. 10:2002;687-699 The two superantigen toxins from Streptococcus, SpeA and SpeC, are closely related, but they bind the TCR in different ways.
35. Fieulaine S., Morera S., Poncet S., Mijakovic I., Galinier A., Janin J., Deutscher J., Nessler S. X-ray structure of a bifunctional protein kinase in complex with its protein substrate HPr. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:2002;13437-13441 The first X-ray structures of a complex of a serine protein kinase with its protein substrate. The target serine is either free or phosphorylated in the crystal.
36. •], the authors show that HPr kinase can dephosphorylate Ser46 of its HPr substrate, and that the reaction is phosphorolysis rather than hydrolysis, as previously assumed: the kinase doubles up as a phosphorylase.