Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 268, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 209-225

  Simons, Kim T ^a   Kooperberg, Charles ^b   Huang, Enoch ^c   Baker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Knowledge based scoring functions; Multiple sequence alignment; Protein folding; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DATA BASE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

EID: 0031585984     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0959     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Avbelj F., Moult J. Determination of the conformation of folding initiation sites in proteins by computer simulation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;129-141.
2. Bauer A., Beyer A. An improved pair potential to recognize native protein folds. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;254-261.
3. Bernstein F., Koetzle T., Williams G., Meyer E., Brice M., Rodgers J., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The protein databank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:1977;535-542.
4. Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. An evolutionary approach to folding small a-helical proteins that uses sequence information and an empirical guiding fitness function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;4436-4440.
5. Bowie J. U., Clarke N. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 7:1990;257-264.
6. Bowie J. U., Luthy R., Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science. 253:1991;164-170.
7. Bystroff C., Han K. F., Simons K. T., Baker D. Local sequence-structure correlations in proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:1996;417-421.
8. Cohen F. E., Sternberg M. J. On the prediction of protein structure: The significance of the root-mean-square deviation. J. Mol. Biol. 138:1980;321-333.
9. Dandekar T., Argos P. Identifying the tertiary fold of small proteins with different topologies from sequence and secondary structure using the genetic algorithm and extended criteria specific for strand regions. J. Mol. Biol. 256:1996;645-660.
10. Defay T., Cohen F. Multiple sequence information for threading algorithms. J. Mol. Biol. 262:1996;314-323.
11. Deisenhofer J. Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of a human FC fragment and its complex with fragment B of protein A from staphylococcus areus at 2.9 and 2.8 angstroms resolution. Biochemistry. 20:1981;2361-2370.
12. Duda R. O., Hart P. E. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. 1973;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Elofsson A., LeGrand S. M., Eisenberg D. Local moves: an efficient algorithm for simulation of protein folding. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;73-82.
14. Engh R., Huber R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta. Crystallog. sect. A. 47:1991;392-400.
15. Fidelis K., Stern P. S., Bacon D., Moult J. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng. 7:1994;953-960.
16. Flockner H., Braxenthaler M., Lackner P., Jaritz M., Ortner M., Sippl M. J. Progress in fold recognition. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;376-386.
17. Gronenborn A. M., Clore G. M. A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. Science. 253:1991;657-661.
18. Han K., Baker D. Recurring local sequence motifs in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 251:1995;176-187.
19. Han K., Baker D. Global properties of the mapping between local sequence and local structure in proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;5814-5818.
20. Henikoff J. G., Henikoff S. Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices. CABIOS. 12:1996;135-143.
21. Henikoff S., Henikoff J. G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 89:1992;10915-10919.
22. Hobohm U., Scharf M., Schneider R., Sander C. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Protein Sci. 1:1992;409-417.
23. Huang E. S., Subbiah S., Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J. Mol. Biol. 252:1995;709-720.
24. Jernigan R. L., Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;195-209.
25. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:1992;86-89.
26. Kissinger C. R., Liu B., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain/DNA complex at 2.8 angstroms resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain/DNA interactions. Cell. 63:1990;579-590.
27. Kocher J. P., Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J. Mol. Biol. 235:1994;1598-1613.
28. Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. II. Application to Protein A, ROP, and Crambin. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;353-366.
29. Kraulis P. J. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24:1991;946-950.
30. Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Hutchinson E. G., Thornton J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26:1993;283-291.
31. Leijonmarck M., Liljas A. Structure of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L7/L12 from Escherichia coli at 1.7 A. J. Mol. Biol. 195:1987;555-579.
32. López-Hernández E., Cronet P., Serrano L., Muñoz V. Folding kinetics of CheY mutants with enhanced native [alpha]-helix propensities. J. Mol. Biol. 266:1997;610-620.
33. Miyazawa S., Jernigan R. L. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J. Mol. Biol. 256:1996;623-644.
34. Mondragon A., Subbiah S., Alamo S. C., Drottar M., Harrison S. C. Structure of the amino-terminal domain of phage 434 repressor at 2.0 angstroms resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 205:1989a;189-200.
35. Mondragon A., Wolberger C., Harrison S. C. Structure of phage 434 cro protein at 2.35 angstroms resolutions. J. Mol. Biol. 205:1989b;179-188.
36. Monge A., Friesner R. A., Honig B. An algorithm to generate low-resolution protein tertiary structures from knowledge of secondary structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;5027-5029.
37. Monge A., Lathrop E. J. P., Gunn J. R., Shenkin P. S., Friesner R. A. Computer Modeling of Protein Folding: conformational and energetic analysis of reduced and detailed protein models. J. Mol. Biol. 247:1995;995-1012.
38. Mumenthaler C., Braun W. Predicting the helix packing of globular proteins by self-correcting distance geometry. Protein Sci. 4:1995;863-871.
39. Munoz V., Serrano L. Local versus nonlocal interactions in protein folding and stability - an experimentalist's point of view. Folding Design. 1:1996;R71-R77.
40. Park B., Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;367-392.
41. Park B. H., Huang E. S., Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J. Mol. Biol. 1997.
42. Pederson J. T., Moult J. Genetic algorithms for protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;227-231.
43. Rank J., Baker D. A desolvation barrier to the hydrophobic cluster formation may contribution to the rate limiting step in protein folding. Protein Sci. 6:1997;347-354.
44. Rost B., Sander C., Schneider R. PhD - an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:1994;53-60.
45. Sander C., Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 9:1991;56-68.
46. Sippl M. J. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 213:1990;859-883.
47. Sippl M. J. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J. Comp. Aided Mol. Design. 7:1993;473-501.
48. Srinivasan R., Rose G. D. LINUS: A hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 22:1995;81-99.
49. Sun S., Thomas P. T., Dill K. A. A simple protein folding algorithm using a binary code and secondary structure constraints. Protein Eng. 8:1995;769-778.
50. Svensson L. A., Thulin E., Forsen S. Proline cis-trans isomers in calbindin D9K observed by X-ray crystallography. J. Mol. Biol. 223:1992;601-606.
51. Thomas P. D., Dill K. A. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;457-469.
52. Wilson C., Doniach S. A computer program to dynamically simulate protein folding: studies with crambin. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 6:1989;193-209.
53. Yi T. M., Lander E. S. Protein secondary structure prediction using nearest-neighbor methods. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;1117-1129.
54. Yue K., Dill K. A. Folding proteins with a simple energy function and extensive conformational searching. Protein Sci. 5:1996;254-261.