An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 76-87

  Tsai, Jerry ^a   Bonneau, Richard ^b   Morozov, Alexandre V ^c   Kuhlman, Brian ^d   Rohl, Carol A ^e   Baker, David ^d  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Protein structure prediction; Rosetta method and decoys; Scoring functions

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY TRANSFER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; HYDROGEN BONDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS;

JONES;

EID: 0038008976     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10454     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hardin C, Pogorelov TV, Luthey-Schulten Z. Ab initio protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:176-181.
2. Felts AK, Gallicchio E, Wallqvist A, Levy RM. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model. Proteins 2002;48:404-422.
3. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;2664:831-846.
4. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CE,Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 2001;45(Suppl 5):119-126.
5. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999;(Suppl 3):171-176.
6. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
7. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
8. Eyrich,VA, Standley DM, Friesner RA. Prediction of protein tertiary structure to low resolution: performance for a large and structurally diverse test set. J Mol Biol 1999;288:725-742.
9. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;277:985-994.
10. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1996;257:716-725.
11. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258: 367-392.
12. Chung SY, Subbiah S. How similar must a template protein be for homology modeling by side-chain packing methods? Pac Symp Biocomput 1996;126-141.
13. Liang J, Dill KA. Are proteins well-packed? Biophys J 2001;81:751-766.
14. Chothia C. Principles that determine the structure of proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 1984;53:537-572.
15. Still WC, Tempczyk A, Hawley RC, Hendrickson TJ. Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:6127-6129.
16. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM Jr, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995;117: 5179-5197.
17. Hawkins GD, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Pairwise solute descreening of solute charges from a dielectric medium. Chem Phys Lett 1995;246:122-129.
18. Hawkins GD, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DH. Parameterized models of aqueous free energies of solvation based on pairwise descreening of solute atomic charges from a dielectric medium. J Phys Chem 1996;100:19824-19839.
19. Jayaram B, Sprous D, Beveridge DL. Solvation free energy of biomacromolecules: Parameters for a modified Generalized Born Model consistent with the AMBER force field. J Chem Phys 1998;102:9571-9576.
20. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
21. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. "New view" of protein folding reconciled with the old through multiple unfolding simulations. Science 1997;278:1928-1931.
22. Qiu D, Sherkin PS, Hollinger FP, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation, A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997;1997:3005-3014.
23. Koehl P, Delarue M. Polar and nonpolar atomic environments in the protein core: implications for folding and binding, Proteins 1994;20:264-278.
24. Gordon DB, Mayo SL. Radical performance enhancements for combinatorial optimization algorithms based on the dead-end elimination theorem. J Comp Chem 1998;19:1505-1514.
25. Bonneau R, Ruczinski I, Tsai J, Baker D. Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction, Protein Sci 2002:11:1937-1944.
26. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:11158-11162.
27. Moult J, Fidelis K, Zemla A, Hubbard T. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round IV, Proteins 2001;45(Suppl 5):2-7.
28. Gonzalez C, Langdon GM, Bruix M, Galvez A, Valdivia E, Maqueda M, Rico M. Bacteriocin AS-48, a microbial cyclic polypeptide structurally and functionally related to mammalian NK-lysin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11221-11226.
29. Dann CE, Hsieh JC, Rattner A, Sharma D, Nathans J, Leahy DJ. Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature 2001;412:86-90.
30. LeGrand S, Merz KM. Rapid approximation to molecular surface area via the use of Boolean logic and look-up tables, J Comput Chem 1993;14:349-352.
31. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 10383-10388.
32. Dunbrack RL Jr, Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993;230:543-574.
33. Morozov AV, Kortemme T, Baker D. Evaluation of models of electrostatic potentials. J Phys Chem B 2003;107:2075-2090.
34. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Bio 2003;326:1239-1259.