Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction

Protein Science

Volumn 11, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 2714-2726

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Zhou, Yaoqi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Decoy sets; Ideal gas reference state; Knowledge based potential

Indexed keywords

CARBON; PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ATOM; GAS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STABILITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; MATHEMATICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; STATISTICS; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; STATISTICS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0036838311     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0217002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Altuvia, Y., Schueler, O., and Margalit, H. 1995. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J. Mol. Biol. 249: 244-250.
2. Avbelj, F., Moult, J., Kitson, D.H., James, M.N., and Hagler, A.T. 1990. Molecular dynamics study of the structure and dynamics of a protein molecule in a crystalline ionic environment, Streptomyces griseus protease A. Biochemistry 29: 8658-8676.
3. Brooks, B.R., Bruccoleri, R.E., Olafson, B.D., States, D.J., Swaminathan, S., and Karplus, M. 1983. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 4: 187-217.
4. Bryant, S.H. and Lawrence, C.E. 1993. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 16: 92-112.
5. Casari, G. and Sippl, M.J. 1992. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from x-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. J. Mol. Biol. 224: 725-732.
6. De Bolt, S.E. and Skolnick, J. 1996. Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: Atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng. 9: 637-655.
7. Dominy, B.N. and Brooks III, C.L. 2002. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials. J. Comput. Chem. 23: 147-160.
8. Duan, Y. and Kollman, P.A. 1998. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282: 740-744.
9. Felts, A.K., Gallicchio, E., Wallqvist, A., and Levy, R.M. 2002. Distinquishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the surface generalized Bom solvent model. Proteins 48: 404-422.
10. Fidelis, K., Stern, P., Bacon, D., and Moult, J. 1994. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng. 7: 953-960.
11. Friedman, H.L. 1985. A course in statistical mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Ghosh, A., Rapp, C.S., and Friesner, R.A. 1998. Generalized Born model based on a surface integral formulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 10983-10990.
13. Gilis, D. and Rooman, M. 1996. Stability changes upon mutation of solvent-accessible residues in proteins evaluated by database-derived potentials. J. Mol. Biol. 257: 1112-1126.
14. 1997. Predicting protein stability changes upon mutation using data-base-derived potentials: Solvent accessibility determines the importance of local versus non-local interactions along the sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 276-290.
15. Guerois, R., Nielsen, J.E., and Serrano, L. 2002. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 302: 369-387.
16. Hao, M.H. and Scheraga, H.A. 1998. Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 184-188.
17. Hendlich, M., Lackner, P., Weitckus, S., Floeckner, H., Froschauer, R., Gottsbacher, K., Casari, G., and Sippl, M.J. 1990. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 216: 167-180.
18. Hobohm, U., Scharf, M., Schneider, R., and Sander, C. 1992. Selection of representive protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1: 409-417.
19. Holm, L. and Sander, C. 1992. Fast and simple Monte Carlo algorithm for side chain optimization in proteins: Application to model building by homology. Proteins 14: 213-223.
20. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 358: 86-89.
21. Jorgensen, W.L., Maxwell, D.S., and Tirado-Rives, J. 1996. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118: 11225-11236.
22. Lazaridis, T. and Karplus, M. 1998. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 477-487.
23. 1999. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 35: 133-152.
24. 2000. Effective energy function for protein structure prediction. Curt. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 139-145.
25. Lee, J., Liwo, A., and Scheraga, H.A. 1999. Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice United-residue force field: Application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to apo calbindin D9K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 2025-2030.
26. Liu, R., Baase, W.A., and Mattthews, B. 2000. The introduction of strain and its effects on the structure and stability of t4 lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 298: 937-953.
27. Lu, H. and Skolnick, J. 2001. A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection. Proteins 44: 223-232.
28. Luthy, R., Bowie, J.U., and Eisenberg, D. 1992. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature 356: 83-85.
29. MacArthur, M.W., Laskowski, R.A., and Thornton, J.M. 1994. Knowledge-based validation of protein structure coordinates derived by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4: 731-737.
30. Melo, F., Sanchez, R., and Sali, A. 2002. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 430: 430-448.
31. Miyazawa, S., and Jernigan, R.L. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18: 534-552.
32. Miyazawa, S. and Jernigan, R.L. 1999. An empirical energy potential with a reference state for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 36: 357-369.
33. Mosimann, S.R.M. and James, M.N. 1995. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins. Proteins 23: 301-317.
34. Moult, J. 1997. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 194-199.
35. Moult, J. and James, M.N.G. 1986. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systmatic search. Proteins 2: 146-163.
36. Neria, E., Fischer, S., and Karplus, M. 1996. Simulation of activation free energies in molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105: 1902-1921.
37. Park, B. and Levitt, M. 1996. Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 367-392.
38. Pedersen, J.T. and Moult, J. 1997. Protein folding simulations with genetic algorithms and a detailed molecular description. J. Mol. Biol. 269: 240-259.
39. Pellegrini, M. and Doniach, S. 1993. Computer simulation of antibody binding specificity. Proteins 15: 436-444.
40. Petrey, D. and Honig, B. 2000. Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models. Protein Sci. 9: 2181-2191.
41. Pillardy, J., Czaplewski, C., Liwo, A., Lee, J., Ripoll, D.R., Kamierkiewicz, R., Oldziej, S., Wedemeyer, W.J., Gibson, K.D., Arnautova, Y.A., Saunders, J., Ye, Y.-J., and Scheraga, H.A. 2001. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 2329-2333.
42. Rojnuckarin, A. and Subramaniam, S. 1999. Knowledge-based interaction potentials for proteins. Proteins 36: 54-67.
43. Samudrala, R. and Moult, J. 1998. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 275: 895-916.
44. Scott, W.R.P., Hunenberger, P.H., Tironi, I.G., Mark, A.E., Billeter. S.R., Fennen, J., Torda, A.E., Huber, T., Kruger, P., and van Gunsteren, W.F. 1999. The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package. J. Phys. Chem. A 103: 3596-3607.
45. Simons, K.T., Kooperberg, C., Huang, E., and Baker, D. 1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 209-225.
46. Sippl, M.J. 1990. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 213: 859-883.
47. Sippl, M.J. 1993. Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins 17: 355-362.
48. Skolnick, J., Kolinski, A., and Ortiz, A.R. 1997. M ONSSTER: A method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 265: 217-241.
49. 2000. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins 38: 3-16.
50. Sun, S. 1993. Reduced representation model of protein structure prediction: Statistical potential and genetic algorithms. Protein Sci. 2: 762-785.
51. Svensson, L.A., Thulin, E., and Forsen, S. 1992. Proline cis-trans isomers in calbindin D9k observed by X-ray crystallography. J. Mol. Biol. 223: 601-606.
52. Tanaka, S. and Scheraga, H.A. 1976. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 9: 945-950.
53. Thomas, P.D. and Dill, K.A. 1996. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J. Mol. Biol. 257: 457-469.
54. Tobi, D. and Elber, R. 2000. Distance-dependent, pair potential for protein folding: Results from linear optimization. Proteins 41: 40-46.
55. Vendruscolo, M., Mirny, L.A., Shakhnovich, E.I., and Domany, E. 2000. Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: Perceptron and Z score. Proteins 41: 192-201.
56. Wallqvist, A., Jernigan, R.L., and Covell, D.G. 1995. A preference-based free-energy parameterization of enzyme-inhibitor binding. Applications to HIV-1-protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci. 4: 1881-1903.
57. Wallqvist, A., Gallicchio, E., Felts, A.K., and Levy, R.M. 2002. Detecting native protein folds among large decoy sets with the OPLS all-atom potential and the surface generalized Born solvent model. Adv. Chem. Phys. 120: 459-486.
58. Weiner, S.J., Kollman, P., Nguyen, D., and Case, D. 1986. An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Comput. Chem. 7: 230-252.
59. Xia, Y., Huang, E.S., Levitt, M., and Samudrala, R. 2000. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 171-185.
60. Zhang, C., Vasmatzis, G., Cornette, J., and De Lisi, C. 1997. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 267: 707-726.
61. Zhang, L.Y., Gallicchio, E., Friesner, R.A., and Levy, R.M. 2001. Solvent models for protein-ligand binding: Comparison of implicit solvent Poisson and surface generalized Born models with explicit solvent simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 22: 591-607.