Research on reform in mathematics education, 1993-2000

Alberta Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 122-138

  Ross, John A ^a   McDougall, Douglas ^a   Hogaboam Gray, Anne ^a  

^a Institute's Field Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036622041     PISSN: 00024805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Anderson, D.S., & Piazza, J.A. (1996). Changing beliefs: Teaching and learning mathematics in constructivist preservice classrooms. Action in Teacher Education, 17(2), 51-62.
2. Austin, J., Hirstein, J., & Walen, S. (1997). Integrated mathematics interfaced with science. School Science and Mathematics, 97(1), 45-49.
3. Ball, D.L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
4. Becker, H. (1998, April). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
5. Becker, J.P., & Jacob, B. (2000). The politics of California School Mathematics. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 529-537.
6. Bitter, G.G., & Hatfield, M.M. (1994). Training elementary mathematics teachers using interactive multimedia. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 405-409.
7. Blanton, M.L., Berenson, S.B., & Norwood, K.S. (2001). Using classroom discourse to understand a prospective mathematics teacher's developing practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 227-242.
8. Boaler, J. (1993). Encouraging the transfer of "school" mathematics to the "real world" through the integration of process and content, context and culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 314-373.
9. Boaler, J. (1994). When do girls prefer football to fashion? An analysis of female underachievement in relation to "realistic" mathematic contexts. British Educational Research Journal, 20, 551-564.
10. Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: The girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9, 285-305.
11. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41-62.
12. Borko, H. (1997). New forms of classroom assessment: Implications for staff development. Theory into Practice, 36, 231-238.
13. Borko, H., Davinroy, K.H., Bliem, C.L., & Cumbo, K.B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers' experience in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100, 273-306.
14. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teacher's knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35-65). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Bossé, M.J. (1995). The NCTM Standards in light of the New Math movement: A warning! Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 171-201.
16. Brahier, D.J. (1998). The effects of staff development focused on assessment practices. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 199-204.
17. Brenner, M.E., Mayer, R.E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B.S., & Webb, D. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 663-689.
18. Bright, G.W., Bowman, A.H., & Vace, N.N. (1998). Reflections about listening and dialogue as evidence of teacher change. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 607-612.
19. Cardelle-Elawar, M. (1995). Effects of metacognitive instruction on low achievers in mathematics problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 81-95.
20. Carroll, W.M. (1996). Use of invented algorithms by second graders in a reform mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 137-150.
21. Christmann, E., Badgett, J., & Lucking, R. (1997). Microcomputer-based computer-assisted instruction within differing subject areas: A statistical deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 281-296.
22. Dunkin, M.J. (1996). Types of errors in synthesizing research in education. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 87-97.
23. Feikes, D. (1998). The role of formal and informal support networks as teachers attempt to change their practice from traditional to innovative reform-oriented teaching of mathematics. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 749-753.
24. Fennema, E., Franke, M., & Carpenter, T. (1993). Using children's mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 555-583.
25. Fink, A. (1998). Conducting research literature reviews: From paper to the Internet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Firestone, W.A., Mayrowetz, D., & Fairman, J. (1998). Performance-based assessment and instructional change: The effects of testing in Maine and Maryland. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 95-113.
27. Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-690.
28. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-250.
29. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Karns, K. (1998). High-achieving students interactions and performance on complex mathematical tasks as a function of homogeneous and heterogeneous pairings. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 227-267.
30. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C., Katzaroff, M., & Dutka, S. (1997). Effects of task-focused goals on low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 513-543.
31. Fullan, M.G., & Connelly, M. (1990). Teacher education in Ontario: Current practice and options for the future. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Colleges and Universities.
32. Gabriele, A., Joram, E., Trafton, P., Thiessen, D., Rathmell, E., & Leutzinger, L. (1999, April). Traveling along the path of mathematics reform: Changes in teachers' source of efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Associated, Montreal.
33. Ganter, S.L. (1994). The importance of empirical observations of mathematics programs: A case from the calculus reform movement. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(2), 1-19.
34. Grant, S.G., Peterson, P.L., & Shojgreen-Downer, A. (1996). Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 509-541.
35. Graue, M.E., & Smith, S.Z. (1996). Parents and mathematics education reform. Urban Education, 30, 395-421.
36. Gregg, J. (1995). The tensions and contradictions of the school mathematics traditions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 442-466.
37. Grimmett, P., & Erickson, G. (1988). Reflection in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Guglielmi, R.S., & Tatrow, K. (1998). Occupational stress, burnout, and health in teachers: A methodological and theoretical analysis. Review of Research in Education, 68, 61-99.
39. Gutstein, E., & Romberg, T. (1995). Teaching children to add and subtract. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 283-324.
40. Hall, G.E., Alquist, A., Hendrickson, M., & George, A.A. (1999, April). Bringing national standards for the teaching and learning of mathematics to the classroom: Implementation, student outcomes and system impacts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
41. Heid, M.K. (1997). The technological revolution and the reform of mathematics. American Journal of Education, 106, 5-61.
42. Hembree, R., & Dessart, D.J. (1992). Research on calculators in mathematics education. In J.T. Fey & C.R. Hirsch (Eds.), Calculators in mathematics education (pp. 23-32). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
43. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M.K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
44. Hernandez-Gantes, V.M., & Brendefur, J.L. (1997, March). Producing authentic, integrated, Standards-based mathematics curriculum: [More than just] a collaborative approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
45. Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 3-19.
46. Hoek, D., van den Eeden, P., & Terwel, J. (1999). The effects of integrated social and cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematics achievement in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 9, 427-448.
47. Huetinck, L., Munshin, S., & Murray-Ward, M. (1995). Eight methods to evaluate support reform in the secondary-level mathematics classroom. Evaluation Review, 19, 646-662.
48. Huntley, M.A., Rasmussen, C.L., Villarubi, R.S., Sangtong, J., & Fey, J.T. (2000). Effects of Standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and functions strand. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 328-361.
49. Isaacs, A., Wagreich, P., & Gartzman, M. (1997). The quest for integration: School mathematics and science. American Journal of Education, 106, 179-206.
50. Keiser, J. M., & Lambdin, D.V. (1996). The clock is ticking: Time constraint issues in mathematics teaching reform. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 23-31.
51. Kemessis, S. (1987). Critical reflection. In M. Wideen & I. Andrews (Eds.), Staff development for school improvement: A focus on the teacher (pp. 73-90). New York: Falmer Press.
52. Kiczek, R.D., & Maher, C.A. (1998). Tracing the origins and extensions of mathematical ideas. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 377-382.
53. King, L. (1993). High and low achievers' perceptions and cooperative learning in two small groups. Elementary School Journal, 93, 399-416.
54. Knapp, N.F., & Peterson, P.L. (1995). Teachers' interpretations of "CGI" after four years: Meanings and practices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 40-65.
55. Lambdin, D.V., & Preston, R.V. (1995). Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 130-140.
56. Lehrer, R., & Shumow, L. (1997). Aligning the construction zones of parents and teachers for mathematics reform. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 41-83.
57. Leighton, J.P., Rogers, W.T., & Maguire, T.O. (1999). Assessment of student problem solving on ill-defined tasks. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 45, 409-427.
58. Lloyd, G.M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher's conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 248-274.
59. Lubienski, S.T. (2000). A clash of social class cultures? Students' experiences in a discussion-intensive seventh-grade mathematics program. Elementary School Journal, 100, 377-403.
60. Lytton, H., & Pyryt, M. (1998). Predictors of achievement in basic skills: A Canadian effective schools study. Canadian Journal of Education, 23, 281-301.
61. Mael, F.A. (1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic discipline. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 101-129.
62. Mandeville, G.K., & Liu, Q. (1997). The effect of teacher certification and task level on mathematics achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 397-407.
63. Matt, G.E., & Cook, T.D. (1994). Threats to validity of research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 503-520). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
64. Mayer, D.P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(2), 53-73.
65. McDougall, D., Lawson, A., Ross, J.A., MacLellan, J., Kajander, A., & Scane, J. (2000). A study on the Impact Math implementation strategy for the Ontario Mathematics Curriculum, Grades 7 & 8. Toronto, ON: OISE/UT.
66. Mevarech, Z.R., & Kremarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 365-394.
67. Mills, V.L., & Garet, M.S. (1996). When resources matter: Supporting departmental features which facilitate reform in the teaching of high school mathematics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York.
68. Monk, D.H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125-145.
69. Moreira, C., & Noss, R. (1995). Understanding teachers' attitudes to change in a logomathematics environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 155-176.
70. Mulryan, C. (1995). Fifth and sixth graders' involvement and participation in cooperative small groups in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 95, 297-310.
71. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
72. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
73. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics: An overview. Reston, VA: Author.
74. Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 94, 285-297.
75. Nolder, R., & Johnson, D. (1995). Professional development: Bringing teachers to the center of the stage. Mathematics in School, 24(1), 32-36.
76. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (1997). Grades 1-8 mathematics. Toronto, ON: Author.
77. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
78. Parker, L.H., & Rennie, L.J. (1997). Teachers' perceptions of the implementation of single-sex classes in coeducational schools. Australian Journal of Education, 41(2), 119-133.
79. Phillip,R.A., Flores,A., Sowder,J.T., & Schapelle,B.P. (1994). Conceptions and practices of extraordinary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 155-180.
80. Pligge, M.A., Kent, L.B., & Spence, M.S. (2000). Examining teacher change within the context of mathematics curriculum reform: Views from middle school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
81. Ponte, J.P., Matos, J.F., Guimarães, H.M., Leal, L.C., & Canavarro, A.P. (1994). Teachers' and students' views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 347-365.
82. Prawat, R., & Jennings, N. (1997). Students as context in mathematics reform: The story of two upper-elementary teachers. Elementary School Journal, 97, 251-270.
83. Price, J., Ball, D., & Luks, S. (1995). Marshalling resources for reform: District administrators and the case of mathematics research. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
84. Remillard, J. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new textbook. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331-350.
85. Reys, B., Reys, R., & Koyama, M.(1996). The development of computation in three Japanese primary-grad textbooks. Elementary School Journal, 96, 423-438.
86. Robertson, S.I., Calder, J., Fung, P., Jones, A., O'Shea, T., & Lambrechts, G. (1996). Pupils, teachers and palmtop computers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, 194-204.
87. Romberg, T.A. (1997). The influence of programs from other countries on the school mathematics reform curricula in the United States. American Journal of Education, 106, 127-147.
88. Ross, J.A. (1995a). Students explaining solutions in student-directed groups: Cooperative learning and reform in mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 411-416.
89. Ross, J.A. (1995b). Effects of feedback on student behavior in cooperative learning groups in a grade 7 math class. Elementary School Journal, 96, 125-143.
90. Ross, J.A. (2000). Full research review. In D. McDougall, A. Lawson, J. Ross, J. MacLellan, A. Kajander, & J. Scane (Eds.), A study on the Impact Math implementation strategy for the Ontario mathematics curriculum, grades 7 & 8 (pp. 57-96) Toronto, ON: OISE/UT.
91. Ross, J.A., & Cousins, J.B. (1995a). Giving and receiving explanations in cooperative learning groups. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41, 104-122.
92. Ross, J.A., & Cousins, J.B. (1995b). Impact of explanation seeking on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 109-117.
93. Ross, J.A., Cousins, J.B., Gadalla, T., & Hannay, L. (1999). Administrative assignment of teachers in restructuring secondary schools: The effect of out-of-field course responsibility on teacher efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 782-804.
94. Ross, J.A., Haimes, D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1996). Improving student helpfulness in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31(2), 13-24.
95. Ross, J.A. & Hogaboam-Gray (1998). Integrating mathematics, science, and technology: Effects on students. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1119-1135.
96. Ross, J.A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & McDougall, D. (2000). Elementary school reform and higher order reasoning in mathematics. Final report of MET Transfer Grant.
97. Ross, J.A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & McDougall, D. (2001). Measuring the effects of elementary school reform in mathematics. Final report of MET Transfer Grant.
98. Ross, J.A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., McDougall, D., & Bruce, C. (2001-2002). The contribution of technology to the implementation of mathematics education reform: Case studies of grade 1-3 teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 123-140.
99. Ross, J.A., McKeiver, S., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1997). Fluctuations in teacher efficacy during the implementation of destreaming. Canadian Journal of Education, 22, 283-296.
100. Roulet, R.G. (1998). Exemplary mathematics teachers: Subject conceptions and instructional practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
101. Sandholtz, J.H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
102. Schifter, D., & Simon, D. (1992). Assessing teachers' development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(2), 187-197.
103. Schoen, H.L., Fey, J.T., Hirsch, C.R., & Coxford, A.F. (1999). Issues and options in the math wars. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 444-453.
104. Schoenfield, A.H. (2001). Making mathematics work for all children. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
105. Schreiber, R., Crooks, D., & Stern, P.N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 311-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
106. Senger, E.S. (1998). Examining teacher and classroom supports for student invention. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North America, 20, 234-243.
107. Shepard, L.A., Flexer, R.J., Hiebert, E.H., Marion, S.F., Mayfield, V., & Weston, T.J. (1996). Effects of introducing classroom performance assessments on student learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 15(3), 7-18.
108. Silver, E.A., & Stein, M.A. (1996). The QUASAR project: The "revolution of the possible" in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476-521.
109. Simon, M.A., & Schifter, D. (1993). Toward a constructivist perspective: The impact of a mathematics teacher inservice program on students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 331-340.
110. Slavin, R.E. and Madden, N.A. (1999, April). Success for All/Roots and Wings: 1999 summary of research on achievement outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Associated, Montreal.
111. Slavit, D. (1996). Graphing calculators in a "hybrid" algebra II classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(1), 9-14.
112. Smith, J.P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387-402.
113. Smith, M.S. (2000). Balancing old and new: An experienced middle teacher's learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. Elementary School Journal, 100, 351-376.
114. Spillane, J.P. (2000). A fifth-grade teacher's reconstruction of mathematics and literacy teaching: Exploring interactions among identity, learning, and subject matter. Elementary School Journal, 100, 307-330.
115. Spillane, J.P., & Zeuli, J.S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1-27.
116. Stein, M., Gover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
117. Sternberg, R., & Horvath, J. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9-18.
118. Teddlie, C. & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
119. Villasenor, A., & Kepner,H.S. (1993). Arithmetic from a problem-solving perspective: An urban implementation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 62-69.
120. Wagstaff, J.G. (1995). Site-based management, shared decision making, and science and mathematics education: A tale of two districts. Theory into Practice, 34, 66-73.
121. Waxman, H.C., & Huang, S.Y. (1996). Classroom instruction differences by level of technology use in middle school mathematics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 157-169.
122. Whicker, K.M., Bol, L., & Nunnery, J.A. (1997), Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics class. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 42-48.
123. Williams, S., & Baxter, J. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. Elementary School Journal, 97, 21-38.