Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 100, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 331-350

  Remillard, Janine T ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000435443     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/499645     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ball, D. L. (1997). Developing mathematics reform: What don't we know about teacher learning - but would make good hypotheses? In S. N. Friel & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 77-112). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
2. Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423.
3. Barnett, C., & Friedman, S. (1997). Mathematics case discussions: Nothing is sacred. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 381-399). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bridgham, K. E. (1971). Comments on some thoughts on science curriculum development. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), Confronting curriculum reform (pp. 60-72). Boston: Little, Brown.
5. Brown, C. A., Smith, S., & Stein, M. K. (1996, April). Linking teacher professional development to enhanced classroom instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
6. Burton, G. M., Hopkins, M. H., Johnson, H. C., Kaplan, J. D., Kennedy, L. M., & Schultz, K. A. (1992). Mathematics plus. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7. Campbell, P. F., & White, D. Y. (1997). Project IMPACT: Influencing and supporting teacher change in predominantly minority schools. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 309-355). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1994). Cognitively guided instruction: Children's thinking about whole numbers. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education.
9. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1988). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-532.
10. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). New York: Macmillan.
11. Cobb, P. (1995). Cultural tools and mathematical learning: A case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 362-385.
12. Cohen, D. K. (1989). Teaching practice: Plus ça change. . . . In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley: McCutchan.
13. Cohen, D. K., & Barnes, C. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. K. Cohen, M. W. McLaughlin, & J. E. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for practice, research, and policy (pp. 207-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Davenport, L. R., & Sassi, A. (1995). Transforming mathematics teaching in grades K-8: How narrative structures in resource materials help support teacher change. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 37-46). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching.
15. Doyle, W. (1993). Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching (pp. 66-79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Featherstone, H., & Smith, S. P. (1996, April). Capacity for reform: Individual teachers mustering resources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
17. Franke, M., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P. (1997). Changing teachers: Interactions between beliefs and classroom practice. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 255-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Heaton, R. M. (1994). Creating and studying a practice of teaching elementary mathematics for understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
20. Jackson, P. W. (1986). The practice of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1997). Teacher change, staff development, and systemic change: Reflections from the eye of a paradigm shift. In S. N. Friel & G. W. Bright (Eds.), Reflecting on our work: NSF teacher enhancement in K-6 mathematics (pp. 133-149). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
22. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 16-32.
23. McLaughlin, M. W. (1976). Implementation as mutual adaptation. Teachers College Record, 77, 339-351.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25. Nelson, B. S. (1995). Inquiry and the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 37-46). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching.
26. Parker, M., & Leinhardt, G. (1995). Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 421-482.
27. Pearson, P. D., & Stephens, D. (1994). Learning about literacy: A 30-year journey. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 22-42). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
28. Putnam, R. T. (1992). Teaching the "hows" of mathematics for everyday life: A case of a fifth-grade teacher. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 163-177.
29. Remillard, J. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding: A fifth-grade teacher's interpretation of policy. Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 179-193.
30. Remillard, J. T. (1996). Changing texts, teachers, and teaching: The role of curriculum materials in mathematics education reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
31. Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315-342.
32. Rosenblatt, L. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1057-1092). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Russell, S. J. (1994, November). The role of the teacher in curriculum development (Or, "Won't well-prepared teachers make up their own?") (Or, "Curriculum: The right way, a necessary evil, a handy reference, or partner?"). Paper presented at the Conference on Teacher Enhancement K-6, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
34. Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., Bastable, V., Yaffee, L., Lester, J. B., & Cohen, S. (1995). Learning mathematics while teaching. In B. S. Nelson (Ed.), Inquiry and the development of teaching: Issues in the transformation of mathematics teaching (pp. 9-16). Newton, MA: Center for the Development of Teaching.
35. Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2d ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Schifter, D. (1998). Learning mathematics for teaching: From a teachers' seminar to the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 55-87.
37. Secada, W. G., & Adajian, L. B. (1997). Mathematics teachers' change in the context of their professional communities. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 193-219). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Shaughnessy, M. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465-494). New York: Macmillan.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York: Longman.
40. Smith, S. P., & Featherstone, H. (1996). "Heknows there are 6 100's in 26?" An investigation into what it means to do mathematics in a teacher group (Craft paper 96-3). East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
41. Sowder, J. (1992). Estimation and number sense. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-389). New York: Macmillan.
42. Stake, R. R. (1978). Case study methods in educational research: Seeking sweet water. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 253-278). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
43. Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teachers learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 155-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488.
45. Stephens, W. M. (1982). Mathematical knowledge and school work A case study of the teaching of developing mathematical processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
46. Stocks, J., & Schofield, J. (1997). Educational reform and professional development. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 283-308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105-127.
48. Tyson-Bernstein, H., & Woodward, A. (1991). Nineteenth-century policies for twenty-first century practice: The textbook reform dilemma. In P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, H. G. Petrie, & L. Weis (Eds.), Textbooks in American society (pp. 91-104). Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
49. Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56-74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2d ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.