Learning to teach mathematics in the context of systemic reform

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 509-541

  Grant, S G ^a   Peterson, Penelope L ^b   Shojgreen Downer, Angela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030524680     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00028312033002509     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ball, D. L. (1990). Reflections and deflections of policy: The case of Carol Turner. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12 (3), 263-275.
2. Ball, D. L., Kennedy, M., McDiarmid, G. W., & Schmidt, W. (1991). A study for examining and tracking changes in teachers' knowledge (Technical Series No. 91-1). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
3. Baratta-Lorton, M. (1976). Mathematics their way. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Baratta-Lorton, R. (1977). Mathematics: A way of thinking. Menlo Park CA-Addison-Wesley.
5. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Brandt, R. (1989). On curriculum in California: A conversation with Bill Honig. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 10-13.
7. California Board of Education. (1985). Mathematics framework for the California public schools. Sacramento: California State Department of Education. California Board of Education. (1992). Mathematics framework for the California public schools. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
8. Clark, C., Carter, B., & Sternberg, B. (1988). Mathematics in stride. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
9. Clune, W. (1993). The best path to systemic and educational policy: Standard/ centralized or differentiated/decentralized? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(3), 233-254.
10. Cohen, D. (1989). Teaching practice: Plus ça change....In P. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley: McCutchan.
11. Cohen, D. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345.
12. Cohen, D., & Ball, D. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 249-256.
13. Cohen, D., & Barnes, C. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, & J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 207-239) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Cohen, D., Peterson, P., Ball, D., Putnam, R., & Wilson, S. (1991). Teachers' learning from reform: 'The case of mathematics instruction in California. A proposal to the National Science Foundation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching and National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
15. Cohen, D., & Spillane, J. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 3-49). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
16. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-14.
17. Dewey, J. (1956). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
19. Fennell, F., Reys, B., Reys, R., & Webb, A. (1988). Mathematics unlimited. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Fennema, E., Franke, M., Carpenter, T., & Carey, D. (1993). Using children's mathematical knowledge in instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 555-584.
21. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Floden, R. E., & Clark, C. M. (1988). Preparing teachers for uncertainty. Teachers College Record, 89, 504-524.
23. Fuhrman, S. (1993). The politics of coherence. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnographic research and the problem of data reduction. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 12, 15-70.
25. Goodson, I. (1992). Studying teachers' lives. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Grant, S. G. (1994). The variation in teachers' responses to reading, writing, and mathematics reforms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
27. Jennings, N. (1996). Teachers learning from policy: Cases of the Michigan reading reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Lampert, M. (1986). Knowing, doing, and teaching multiplication. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 305-342.
29. Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 225-282.
30. McLaughlin, M. (1990). The Rand Change Agent Study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
31. O'Day, J., & Smith, M. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. Fuhrman (Eds.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Peshkin, A. (1993). The goodness of qualitative research. Educational Reseacher, 22(2), 24-30.
33. Peterson, P. L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 277-296.
34. Peterson, P. L., Prawat, R. S., & Grant, S. G. (1994, April). Rising expectations and declining resources: Learning to make reform in the best and worst of times. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
35. Remillard, J. (1991). Is there an alternative? An analysis of commonly used and distinctive elementary mathematics curricula (Elementary Subjects Center Series No. 31). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects.
36. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
38. Smith, M., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman, & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). New York: Falmer.
39. Spillane, J. P. (1993). Interactive policy-making: State instructional policy and the role of the school district. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
40. Weimers, N. (1990). Transformation and accommodation: A case of Joe Scott. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 297-308.
41. Wilson, S. M. (1990). A conflict of interests: The case of Mark Black. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 309-326.
42. Wilson, S. M., Peterson, P. L., Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Learning by all. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 468-477.