The effects of integrated social and cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematics achievement in secondary education

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 427-448

  Hoek, Dirk ^a   Van Den Eeden, Pieter ^b   Terwel, Jan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Groupwork; Mathematics education; Problem solving; Social and cognitive strategies; Strategy instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001196114     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00026-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aurin, K. (1966). Bildung in Neuer Sicht, Ermittlung und Erschliessung von Begabungen im ländlichen Raum [Education in a new perspective, coaching and opening up the giftedness in the different federal states]. Villingen, Germany: Neckar-Verlag.
2. Azmitia, M., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). Social influences on children's cognition: state of the art and future directions. In H. W. Reese, Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 90-144). New York: Academic Press.
3. Brenner M.E., Mayer R., Moseley B., Brar T., Dúran R., Smith Reed B., Webb D. American Educational Research Journal. 34:1997;663-689.
4. Brown, A. L., & Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick, Knowing learning and instruction. Essays in the honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-351). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chinnappan M., Lawson M.J. The effects of training in the use of executive strategies in geometry. Learning and Instruction. 6:1996;1-17.
6. Cohen, E. G. (1986). Designing group work, strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
7. Cohen E.G. Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research. 64:1994;1-35.
8. Cohen E.G., Lotan R.A. Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal. 32:1995;99-120.
9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick, Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. De Klerk L.F.W., Schouten A., Van der Sanden J.M.M. Differentiatie bij het leren van technische vaardigheden [Differentiation at learning of technical skills]. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift. 13:1988;341-350.
11. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
12. Gillies R.B., Ashman A.F. Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction. 6:1996;187-200.
13. Good, T. L., Mulryan, C., & McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for Instruction in Mathematics. In D. A. Grouws, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165-197). New York: MacMillan.
14. Greer B. Modelling reality in mathematical classrooms. Learning and Instruction. 7:1997;293-307.
15. Hattie J., Biggs J., Purdie N. Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 66:1996;99-136.
16. Herfs, P. G. P., Mertens, E. H. M., Perrenet J. Chr., & Terwel, J. (1991). Leren door samenwerken [Learning by working together]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
17. Hoek D.J., Terwel J., Van den Eeden P. Effects of training in the use of social and cognitive strategies: an intervention study in secondary mathematics in co-operative groups. Educational Research and Evaluation. 3:1997;364-389.
18. Horn, W. (1969). Prüfsystem für Schul- und Bildungsberatung (Handanweisung) [Testing system for school and developmental growth]. Göttingen, Germany: Verlag für Psychologie Hochrefe.
19. Leechor, C. (1988). How high and low achievers differentially benefit from working together in cooperative small groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
20. Mason D.W., Good T.L. Effects of two-group and whole-class teaching on regrouped elementary students' mathematics achievement. American Educational Research Journal. 30:1993;328-360.
21. Prawat R.S. Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: a research synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 59:1989;1-41.
22. Prosser, F., Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1993). ML-3 Software for three level analysis: users guide. London: University of London, Institute of Education.
23. Resnick, L. B.(1989). Introduction. In Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Rosenshine B., Meister C., Chapman S. Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research. 66:1996;181-221.
25. Salomon G., Globerson T. Why teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research. 13:1989;89-99.
26. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Problem solving in mathematics curriculum: a report, recommendations and an annotated bibliography. The Mathematical Association of America, MAA Notes, No. 1.
27. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problems solving. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Schoenfeld A.H. Ideas in the air: speculations on small group learning, environment and cultural influences on cognition. International Journal of Educational Research. 13:1989;71-88.
29. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, Metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165-197). New York: MacMillan.
30. Stevens R.J., Slavin R.E. The cooperative elementary school: effects on students' achievement, attitudes and social relations. American Educational Research Journal. 32:1995;321-351.
31. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulties, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction. 4:1994;295-312.
32. Tamiji R.A., Sweller J. Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80:1988;424-436.
33. Terwel, J. (1997). Grenzen aan de groep? Een onderwijspedagogisch perspectief op leren in contexten [Limits to the group? An educational perspective on learning in social contexts]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit (Inaugural Lecture).
34. Terwel, J. (1990). Real math in cooperative groups in secondary education. In N. Davidson, Cooperative learning in mathematics, (pp. 228-264). New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
35. Terwel J., Van den Eeden P. Differentiële effecten van het werken in kleine groepen: theorie, hypothesen en analyse [Differential effects of working in small groups: theory, hypotheses and analyses]. Pedagogische Studiën. 69:1992;51-66.
36. Terwel J., Van den Eeden P. Curriculum evaluation and multilevel analysis: effects of co-operative learning in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 18:1992;133-148.
37. Terwel J., Herfs P.G.P., Mertens E.H.M., Perrenet J.Chr. Co-operative learning and adaptive instruction in a mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 26:1994;217-233.
38. Van den Eeden P., Terwel J. Evaluation of a mathematics curriculum: differential effects. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 20:1994;457-475.
39. Van Streun, A. (1989). Heuristisch wiskunde-onderwijs: Verslag van een onderwijs experiment [Heuristic Mathematics Education: Report of a teaching experiment]. Doctoral dissertation, Groningen, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Groningen.
40. Van Streun A. Hoe onderwijs je probleemoplossen? [How do you teach problem solving?]. Tijdschrift voor Didactiek der β-wetenschappen. 12:1994;210-225.
41. Webb N.M. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research. 52:1989;421-445.
42. Webb N.M. Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 22:1991;366-389.
43. Webb, N. M. (1995). Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, & N. Miller, Interaction in cooperative groups: the theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 102-119). Cambridge, MA: University Press.
44. Webb N.M., Farivar S. Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal. 31:1994;369-395.