Relationships between research and the NCTM standards

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 3-19

  Hiebert, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

All levels; Policy issues; Reform in mathematics education; Research issues; Review of research; Teaching practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042433872     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/749627     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T. R., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers: A clinical teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 323-341.
2. Bondi, N. (1998, May 26). Parents wary of new program for teaching math. Detroit News.
3. Brownell, W. A., & Chazal, C. B. (1935). The effects of premature drill in third-grade arithmetic. Journal of Educational Research, 29, 17-28.
4. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C.-P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematical thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531.
5. Carpenter, T. P., Moser, J. M., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1982). Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 3-29.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
9. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. (1975). Overview and analysis of school mathematics, grades K-12. Washington, DC: Author.
10. Dixon, R. C., Carnine, D. W., Lee, D.-S., Wallin, J., The National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, & Chard, D. (1998). Review of high quality experimental mathematics research: Report to the California State Board of Education. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators.
11. Elmore, R. F., Peterson, P. L., & McCarthey, S. J. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Fawcett, H. P. (1938). The nature of proof; a description and evaluation of certain procedures used in a senior high school to develop an understanding of the nature of proof. 1938 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
13. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 403-434.
14. Fey, J. (1979). Mathematics teaching today: Perspectives from three national surveys. Mathematics Teacher, 72, 490-504.
15. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Ansell, E., & Behrend, J. (in press). Understanding teachers' self-sustaining, generative change in the context of professional development. International Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education.
16. Fuson, K. C., & Briars, D. J. (1990). Using a base-ten blocks learning/teaching approach for first-and second-grade place-value and multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 180-206.
17. Gelernter, D. (1998). Put down that calculator, stupid! New York Post [On-line]. Available Internet: http://www.nypostonline.com/commentary/2735.htm
18. Good, T. L., Grouws, D. A., & Beckerman, T. (1978). Curriculum pacing: Some empirical data in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10, 75-81.
19. Hanna, G. (1998). Evaluating research papers in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity: An ICMI study (Book 2, pp. 399-407). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Heid, M. K. (1988). Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 3-25.
21. Hembree, R., & Dessart, D. J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 83-99.
22. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 98-122.
23. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students' learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393-425.
24. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1996). Instruction, understanding, and skill in multidigit addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 251-283.
25. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25 (4), 12-21.
26. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
27. Hoetker, J., & Ahlbrand, W. (1969). The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 145-167.
28. Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., Johnson, T. M., & Tarr, J. E. (1997, April). Assessing and using students' probabilistic thinking to inform instruction. Paper presented at the Research Presession to the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Minneapolis, MN.
29. Kamii, C. (with Joseph, L. L.). (1989). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic - 2nd grade: Implications of Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Kamii, C. K. (with DeClark, G.). (1985). Young children reinvent arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Kilpatrick, J. (1993). Beyond face value: Assessing research in mathematics education. In G. Nissen & M. Blomhøj (Eds.), Criteria for scientific quality and relevance in the didactics of mathematics (pp. 15-34). Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Research Council for the Humanities.
32. King, I. L. (1973). A formative development of an elementary school unit on proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 57-63.
33. Knapp, M. S., Shields, P. M., & Turnbull, B. J. (1992). Academic challenge for the children of poverty. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy and Planning.
34. Kouba, V. L., & Wearne, D. (in press). Number sense, properties, and operations. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
35. Leinhardt, G. (1986). Expertise in math teaching. Educational Leadership, 43 (7), 28-33.
36. Lester, F. K., Jr., & Lambdin, D. V. (1998). The ship of Theseus and other metaphors for thinking about what we value in mathematics education research. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity: An ICMI study (Book 2, pp. 415-425). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
37. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-340.
38. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 129-151.
39. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers' professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. InN. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175-204). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
40. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 16-32.
41. Moss, J., & Case, R. (in press). Developing children's understanding of rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.
42. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45. O'Day, J., & Smith, M. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent policy (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Palmiter, J. R. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 151-156.
47. Parke, C. S., & Smith, M. (1998, April). Examining student learning outcomes in the QUASAR project and comparing features at two sites that may account for their differential outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
48. Resnick, L. B., & Omanson, S. F. (1987). Learning to understand arithmetic. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 41-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
50. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1996). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.
51. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 55-80.
52. Sharma, A. (1998, April 26). Math not working for some. Riverside Press-Enterprise.
53. Silver, E. A. (1998). Improving mathematics in middle school: Lessons from TIMSS and related research. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
54. Stake, R., & Easley, J. (Eds.). (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
55. Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (in press). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices: A symposium on mathematics and science learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Stigler, J. W. (1998). Video surveys: New data for the improvement of classroom instruction. In S. G. Paris & H. M. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling (pp. 129-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 14-21.
58. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Swafford, J. O., Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1997). Increased knowledge in geometry and instructional practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 467-483.
60. Thorndike, E. L. (1922). The psychology of arithmetic. New York: Macmillan.
61. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261, 384-395, 553-564.
62. Villaseñor, A., Jr., & Kepner, H. S., Jr. (1993). Arithmetic from a problem-solving perspective: An urban implementation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 62-69.
63. Wearne, D., & Hiebert, J. (1988). A cognitive approach to meaningful mathematics instruction: Testing a local theory using decimal numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 371-384.
64. Wearne, D., & Hiebert, J. (1989). Cognitive changes during conceptually based instruction on decimal fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 507-513.
65. Wearne, D., & Kouba, V. L. (in press). Rational numbers. In E. A. Silver & P. A. Kenney (Eds.), Results from the seventh mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
66. Weiss, I. (1978). Report of the 1977 national survey of science, mathematics, and social studies education. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
67. Weiss, I. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
68. Welch, W. (1978). Science education in Urbanville: A case study. In R. Stake and J. Easley (Eds.), Case studies in science education (pp. 5-1-5-33). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
69. Wood, T., & Sellers, P. (1996). Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: Third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 337-353.
70. Yerushalmy, M., Chazan, D., & Gordon, M. (1987). Guided inquiry and technology: A year long study of children and teachers using the Geometric Supposer (Technical Report No. 88-6). Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 294 711)