What influences students' peer-feedback uptake? Relations between error tolerance, feedback tolerance, writing self-efficacy, perceived language skills and peer-feedback processing

Learning and Individual Differences

Volumn 97, Issue , 2022, Pages

  Aben, Jochem E J ^a   Timmermans, Anneke C ^b   Dingyloudi, Filitsa ^b   Lara, Mayra Mascareño ^b   Strijbos, Jan Willem ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Error tolerance; Feedback tolerance; Peer feedback uptake; Perceived language skills

Indexed keywords

EID: 85132954247     PISSN: 10416080     EISSN: 18733425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102175     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aben, J.E.J., Dingyloudi, F., Timmermans, A.C., Strijbos, J.W., Embracing errors for learning: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in feedback provision and processing in dyadic interactions. Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Molloy, E., (eds.) The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners, 2019, Palgrave Macmillan, 107–125, 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_7.
2. Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.W., Ufer, S., The impact of peer solution quality on peer-feedback provision on geometry proofs: Evidence from eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction 58 (2018), 182–192, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003.
3. Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.W., Ufer, S., Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: Role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1 (2018), 11–30, 10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0.
4. Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.W., Fischer, F., Effects of written peer-feedback content and sender's competence on perceptions, performance, and mindful cognitive processing. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1 (2018), 31–49, 10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z.
5. Carless, D., Boud, D., The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:8 (2018), 1315–1325, 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
6. Cho, K., MacArthur, C., Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 328–338, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006.
7. Ciftci, H., Kocoglu, Z., Effects of peer e-feedback on turkish EFL students' writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research 46:1 (2012), 61–84, 10.2190/ec.46.1.c.
8. Clifford, M.M., Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten-to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 58:1 (1988), 15–27, 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00875.x.
9. Curran, P.J., West, S.G., Finch, J.F., The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods 1:1 (1996), 16–29, 10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16.
10. Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F.J., Stokking, K.M., Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction 22:3 (2012), 171–184, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.003.
11. Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., Nakamura, B.J., Chorpita, B.F., Weisz, J.R., A psychometric analysis of the revised child anxiety and depression scale—Parent version in a clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38:2 (2010), 249–260, 10.1007/s10802-009-9363-8.
12. Edwards, R., Pledger, L., Development and construct validation of the sensitivity to feedback scale. Communication Research Reports 7:2 (1990), 83–89, 10.1080/08824099009359859.
13. Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., Conklin, S., The relation of college student self-efficacy toward writing and writing self-regulation aptitude: Writing feedback perceptions as a mediating variable. Teaching in Higher Education 20:2 (2015), 197–207, 10.1080/13562517.2014.974026.
14. Esterhazy, R., Damşa, C., Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education 44:2 (2019), 260–274, 10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.
15. Gan, M.J.S., Hattie, J., Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an investigative task. Instructional Science 42:6 (2014), 861–878, 10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4.
16. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., Improving the effectiveness of peer-feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 304–315, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.
17. Gloy, K., Fehler aus normentheoretischer sicht [Errors from a norm-theoretical point of view]. Zeitschrift für Unterricht, Wissenschaft und Politik 9 (1987), 190–204.
18. Graham, S., Perin, D., A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology 99:3 (2007), 445–476, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445.
19. Harlen, W., The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. Gardner, J., (eds.) Assessment and learning, 2006, Sage, 61–80, 10.4135/9781446250808.n11.
20. Hattie, J., Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77:1 (2007), 81–112, 10.3102/003465430298487.
21. Hodapp, V., Benson, J., The multidimensionality of test anxiety: A test of different models. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 10:3 (1997), 219–244, 10.1080/10615809708249302.
22. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6:1 (1999), 1–55, 10.1080/10705519909540118.
23. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., Van Den Broek, P., Peer-feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer-feedback role, peer-feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:6 (2018), 955–968, 10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.
24. Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van den Broek, P., Van Driel, J., The impact of formative peer-feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:6 (2019), 863–880, 10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896.
25. Kapur, M., Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist 51:2 (2016), 289–299, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
26. Kavadlo, J., Tutoring taboo: A reconsideration of style in the writing center. Refiguring Prose Style: Possibilities for Writing Pedagogy, 215–26, 2005, 10.2307/j.ctt4cgq34.21.
27. King, P.E., Schrodt, P., Weisel, J.J., The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education 58:2 (2009), 235–261, 10.1080/03634520802515705.
28. Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A., The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 1996, 254, 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
29. Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., Zararsiz, G., MVN: An R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal 6:2 (2014), 151–162, 10.32614/rj-2014-031.
30. Lam, R., A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer-feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 114–127, 2010, 10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.
31. Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Biemans, H.J., How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58:2 (2021), 195–206.
32. Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Talaee, E., Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology 52:2 (2021), 768–784.
33. Lennon, P., Error: Some problems of definition, identification, and distinction. Applied Linguistics 12:2 (1991), 180–196, 10.1093/applin/12.2.180.
34. MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., Sugawara, H.M., Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods 1:2 (1996), 130–149, 10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.130.
35. Marsh, H.W., The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology 82:4 (1990), 623–636, 10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.623.
36. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., Wen, Z., In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11:3 (2004), 320–341, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
37. Metcalfe, J., Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology 68 (2017), 465–489, 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022.
38. Molloy, E., Boud, D., Henderson, M., Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:4 (2020), 527–540, 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
39. Narciss, S., Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Education Review 23 (2013), 7–26, 10.1177/1475725720971887.
40. Nelson, M.M., Schunn, C.D., The nature of feedback: How different types of peer-feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science 37:4 (2009), 375–401, 10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x.
41. Newsom, J.T., Alternative estimation methods. Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/semclass/ho_estimate.pdf, 2018 p. 2.
42. Nilson, L.B., Improving student peer-feedback. College Teaching 51:1 (2003), 34–38, 10.1080/87567550309596408.
43. Oser, F., Spychiger, M., Lernen ist schmerzhaft: Zur theorie des negativen wissens und zur praxis der fehlerkultur [Learning is painful: On the theory of negative knowledge and on the practice of error culture]. Beltz, 2005, 10.24452/sjer.28.3.5335.
44. Panadero, E., Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment. Brown, G., Harris, L., (eds.) Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, 2016, Routledge, 247–266.
45. Rach, S., Ufer, S., Heinze, A., Learning from errors: Effects of a teacher training on students’ attitudes toward and their individual use of errors. Tso, T., (eds.) Proceedings of the 36th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 3, 2012, PME, 329–336.
46. Rosseel, Y., Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48:2 (2012), 1–36, 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
47. Ruegg, R., The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal 46:2 (2018), 87–102, 10.1080/09571736.2014.958190.
48. Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., Batinic, B., Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior 20:4 (1999), 527–547, 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199907)20:4<527::aid-job886>3.0.co;2-g.
49. Saeed, M.A., Ghazali, K., Sahuri, S.S., Abdulrab, M., Engaging EFL learners in online peer-feedback on writing: What does it tell us?. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 17 (2018), 39–61, 10.28945/3980.
50. Schreiber, J.B., Nora, A., Stage, F.K., Barlow, E.A., King, J., Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research 99:6 (2006), 323–338, 10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338.
51. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G., A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. 2nd ed., 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 10.4324/9781410610904.
52. Sebastian, C., Burnett, S., Blakemore, S.J., Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:11 (2008), 441–446, 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.008.
53. Shute, V.J., Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78:1 (2008), 153–189, 10.3102/0034654307313795.
54. Smith, C.D., King, P.E., Student feedback sensitivity and the efficacy of feedback interventions in public speaking performance improvement. Communication Education 53:3 (2004), 203–216, 10.1080/0363452042000265152.
55. Strijbos, J.W., Müller, A., Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess. Ditton, H., Müller, A., (eds.) Feedback and evaluation: Theoretical foundations, empirical findings, practical implementation [Feedback und Rückmeldungen: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Befunde, praktische Anwendungsfelder], 2014, Waxmann, 87–134.
56. Strijbos, J.W., Narciss, S., Dünnebier, K., Peer-feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 291–303, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
57. Sutton, P., Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49:1 (2012), 31–40, 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
58. Ullman, J.B., Bentler, P.M., Structural equation modeling. Schinka, J.A., Velicer, W.F., (eds.) Handbook of psychology, 2003, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 607–634, 10.1002/0471264385.wei0224.
59. Van der Aar, L.P.E., Peters, S., Crone, E.A., The development of self-views across adolescence: Investigating self-descriptions with and without social comparison using a novel experimental paradigm. Cognitive Development 48 (2018), 256–270, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.10.001.
60. Van Gennip, N.A., Segers, M.S., Tillema, H.H., Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 280–290, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010.
61. Van Gennip, N.A.E., Segers, M.S.R., Tillema, H.H., Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review 4:1 (2009), 41–54, 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.
62. Vandermeulen, N., Synthesis writing in upper-secondary education: From a baseline of texts and processes to process-oriented feedback. 2020, University of Antwerp [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
63. Värlander, S., The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education 13:2 (2008), 145–156, 10.1080/13562510801923195.
64. Wahlheim, C.N., Jacoby, L.L., Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition 41:1 (2013), 1–15, 10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9.
65. Wichmann, A., Funk, A., Rummel, N., Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1 (2018), 165–184.
66. Wihastyanang, W.D., Kusumaningrum, S.R., Latief, M.A., Cahyono, B.Y., Impacts of providing online teacher and peer-feedback on students’ writing performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 21:2 (2020), 178–189, 10.17718/tojde.728157.
67. Winder, R., Kathpalia, S.S., Koo, S.L., Writing Centre tutoring sessions: Addressing students’ concerns. Educational Studies 42:4 (2016), 323–339, 10.1080/03055698.2016.1193476.
68. Wingate, U., The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:5 (2010), 519–533.
69. Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M., Rowntree, J., Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist 52:1 (2017), 17–37.
70. Yang, Y.F., Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer-feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29:4 (2016), 683–702, 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440.
71. Zhang, X., McEneaney, J.E., What is the influence of peer-feedback and author response on Chinese university students’ English writing performance?. Reading Research Quarterly 55:1 (2020), 123–146, 10.1002/rrq.259.
72. Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., Huang, R., Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:3 (2018), 500–514, 10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533.
73. Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal 31:4 (1994), 845–862, 10.3102/00028312031004845.
74. Zwicky, A.M., Mistakes. 1980, Advocate Publishing Group.