Embracing errors for learning: Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in feedback provision and processing in dyadic interactions

The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 107-125

  Aben, Jochem E J ^a   Dingyloudi, Filitsa ^a   Timmermans, Anneke C ^a   Strijbos, Jan Willem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086190569     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106-1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.l434l28.
2. Ajjawi, R., Molloy, E., Bearman, M., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Contextual influences on feedback practices: An ecological perspective. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 129-143). Singapore: Springer.
3. Akin, J., Goldberg, A., Myers, G., & Stewart, J. (1970). Language behavior: A book of readings in communication. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton & Co.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Barnlund, D. C. (1968). Interpersonal communication: Survey and studies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
7. Boud, D., Ajjawi, R., Dawson, P., & Tai, J. (Eds.). (2018). Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work. New York: Routledge.
8. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.
9. Cowan, J. (2010). Developing the ability for making evaluative judgements. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903560036.
10. Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J. W. (2018). Just plain peers across social networks: Peer-feedback networks nested in personal and academic networks in higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 86-112. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.02.002.
11. Finkelstein, S. R., Fishbach, A., & Tu, Y. (2017). When friends exchange negative feedback. Motivation and Emotion, 41(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9589-z.
12. Frese, M., & Keith, N. (2015). Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 661-687. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205.
13. Fong, C. J., Schallert, D. L., Williams, K. M., Williamson, Z. H., Warner, J. R., Lin, S., & Kim, Y. W (2018). When feedback signals failure but offers hope for improvement: A process model of constructive criticism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.014.
14. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.
15. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Guo, Y., Zhang, Y., Liao, J., Guo, X., Liu, J., Xue, X., et al. (2017). Negative feedback and employee job performance: Moderating role of the big five.Social Behavior and Personality, 45(10), 1735-1744. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6478.
17. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
18. Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. H. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863-880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896.
19. Ilgen, D., Fisher, C., & Taylor, S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349-371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4349.
20. Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12107.
21. Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Classroom and technology-supported help seeking: The need for converging research paradigms. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.007.
22. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.
23. Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
24. Kulhavy, R. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211.
25. Levy, P., & Williams, J. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005.
26. Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 465-489. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022.
27. Nadler, D.A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23(3), 309-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90001-1.
28. Narciss, S. (2017). Conditions and effects of feedback viewed through the lens of the interactive tutoring feedback model. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 173-189). Singapore: Springer.
29. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Van Merriënboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Patchan, M., & Schunn, C. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science, 43(5), 591-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x.
31. Rach, S., Ufer, S., & Heinze, A. (2013). Teachers training on students’ attitudes towards and their individual use of errors. PNA, 8(1), 21-30.
32. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28 (1), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103.
33. Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Johnson, A. C., & Mayra, C. R. (2017). Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 207-221. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.076.
34. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Parker, J. G., & Bowker, J. C. (2008). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W Damon, M. R. Lerner, D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 141-180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
35. Ryan, R., & Henderson, M. (2018). Feeling feedback: Students’ emotional responses to educator feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 880-892. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456.
36. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
37. Sitkin, S. B. (1996). Learning from failure: The strategy of small losses. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 541-577). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Steen-Utheim, A., & Wittek, A. L. (2017). Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/jdcsi.2017.06.002.
39. Strijbos, J. W., & Müller, A. (2014). Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess. In H. Ditton, & A. Müller (Eds.), Feedback and evaluation: Theoretical foundations, empirical findings, practical implementation [Feedback und Rückmeldungen: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Befunde, praktische Anwendungsfelder] (pp. 87-134). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
40. Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/jdearninstruc.2009.08.008.
41. Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality ofwork. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
42. Timms, M., DeVelle, S., & Lay, D. (2016). Towards a model of how learners process feedback: A deeper look at learning. Australian Journal of Education, 60(2), 128-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116652912.
43. Upshaw, H. S. (1978). Personality and social effects in judgment. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception: Psychophysical judgment and measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 143-172). London, UK: Academic Press.
44. VandeWalle, D. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 581-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.004.
45. Van Gennip, N., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.
46. Wichmann, A., Funk, A., & Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7.
47. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
48. Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.