The impact of peer solution quality on peer-feedback provision on geometry proofs: Evidence from eye-movement analysis

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 58, Issue , 2018, Pages 182-192

  Alqassab, Maryam ^a,c   Strijbos, Jan Willem ^a,b   Ufer, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NONE   (Bahrain)

Author keywords

Eye tracking; Geometry proofs; Peer feedback; Preservice teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049731416     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.W., Ufer, S., Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: Role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1 (2018), 11–30, 10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0.
2. Bara, B.G., Bucciarelli, M., Lombardo, V., Model theory of deduction: A unified computational approach. Cognitive Science 25:6 (2001), 839–901.
3. Bednarik, R., Tukiainen, M., Temporal eye-tracking data: Evolution of debugging strategies with multiple representations. Rähä K.J., Duchowski, A., (eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on eye tracking research & applications, 2008, ACM, New York, NY, 99–102, 10.1145/1344471.1344497.
4. Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J.W., Fischer, F., Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: Role of feedback-characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions: Peer feedback processing with eye tracking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31:5 (2015), 422–434, 10.1111/jcal.12091.
5. Cho, Y.H., Cho, K., Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science 39 (2011), 629–643, 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
6. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Picture or text first? Explaining sequence effects when learning with pictures and text. Educational Psychology Review 27:1 (2015), 153–180, 10.1007/s10648-014-9264-4.
7. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., Holmqvist, K., How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction 28 (2013), 48–63, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002.
8. Field, A.P., Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed., 2009, SAGE, Los Angeles.
9. Fischbein, E., The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics 24:2 (1993), 139–162.
10. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 304–315, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.
11. Große, C.S., Renkl, A., Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes?. Learning and Instruction 17:6 (2007), 612–634, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008.
12. Harel, G., Sowder, L., Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. Lester, F.K., (eds.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2007, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 805–842.
13. Hegarty, M., Just, M.A., Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 32:6 (1993), 717–742, 10.1006/jmla.1993.1036.
14. Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., Green, C.E., Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students’ eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology 84:1 (1992), 76–84, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.76.
15. Hodds, M., Alcock, R., Inglis, M., Self-explanation training improves proof comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 45:1 (2014), 62–101, 10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0062.
16. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., De Weijer, J.V., Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. 2011, Oxford University press, New York.
17. Hyönä J., The use of eye-movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20:2 (2010), 172–176, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.013.
18. Inglis, M., Alcock, L., Expert and novice approaches to reading mathematical proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 43:4 (2012), 358–390, 10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358.
19. Isotani, S., Adams, D., Mayer, R.E., Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B., McLaren, B.M., Can erroneous examples help middle-school students learn decimals?. Delgado Kloos, C., Gillet, D., Crespo Gracia, R.M., Wild, F., Wolpers, M., (eds.) Sixth European conference on technology enhanced Learning: Towards ubiquitous learning, 2011, Springer, Palermo, Italy, 181–195.
20. Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M., Schaeken, W., Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review 99:3 (1992), 418–439.
21. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., Eye fixations and cognitive processing. Cognitive Psychology 8:4 (1976), 441–480, 10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3.
22. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science 14:4 (1990), 511–550.
23. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A., Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11:1 (1987), 65–100.
24. Lavy, I., Shriki, A., Engaging prospective teachers in peer assessment as both assessors and assesses: The case of geometrical proofs. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, March 2014, 1–32 Retrieved from: http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/jour-nal/lavey2pdf.
25. Lindner, M.A., Eitel, A., Strobel, B., Köller, O., Identifying processes underlying the multimedia effect in testing: An eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction 47 (2017), 91–102, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.007.
26. Mair, P., Wilcox, R., Robust statistical methods: The R package WRS2. Retrieved from http://cran.usthb.dz/web/packages/WRS2/vignettes/WRS2.pdf, 2015.
27. Mason, L., Tornatora, M.C., Pluchino, P., Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education 60:1 (2013), 95–109, 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011.
28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Principles and standards for school mathematics. 2000, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
29. Patchan, M.M., Charney, D., Schunn, C.D., A validation study of students’ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research 1:2 (2009), 124–152, 10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1.
30. Patchan, M.M., Schunn, C.D., Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instructional Science 43:5 (2015), 591–614, 10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x.
31. Rayner, K., Eye-movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124:3 (1998), 372–422, 10.1037//0033-2909.124.3.372.
32. Reiss, K., Heinze, A., Klieme, E., Argumentation, proof and the understanding of proof. Weigand, H.-G., Neill, N., Peter-Koop, A., Reiss, K., Törner, G., Wollring, B., (eds.) Developments in mathematics education in Germany: Selected papers from the annual conference on didactics of mathematics, 2000, Franzbecker, Hildesheim, Germany, 109–120.
33. Robinson, M.D., Clore, G.L., Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27:11 (2001), 1520–1532, 10.1177/01461672012711012.
34. Schnotz, W., Commentary: Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review 14:1 (2002), 101–120, 10.1023/A:1013136727916.
35. Schoenfeld, A.H., On having and using geometric knowledge. Hiebert, J., (eds.) Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics, 1986, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 225–264.
36. Selden, A., Selden, J., Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 34:1 (2003), 4–36, 10.2307/30034698.
37. Selden, A., Selden, J., Validations of proofs as a type of reading and sense-making. Beswick, K., Muir, T., Wells, J., (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 4, 2015, PME, Hobart, Tasmania, 145–152.
38. Selden, A., Selden, J., A comparison of proof comprehension, proof construction, proof validation and proof evaluation. Paper presented at the KHDM conference didactics of mathematics in higher education as a scientific discipline, Hannover, Germany, December, 2015.
39. Sluijsmans, D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Bastiaens, T.J., The training of assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies In Educational Evaluation 29:1 (2003), 23–42, 10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90003-4.
40. Sommerhoff, D., Ufer, S., Kollar, I., Proof validation aspects and cognitive student prerequisites in undergraduate mathematics. Csíkos, C., Rausch, A., Szitányi, J., (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 4, 2016, PME, Szeged, Hungary, 219–226.
41. Stalbovs, K., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Implementation intentions during multimedia learning: Using if-then plans to facilitate cognitive processing. Learning and Instruction 35 (2015), 1–15, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.09.002.
42. Strijbos, J.W., Martens, R.L., Prins, F.J., Jochems, W.M.G., Content analysis: What are they talking about?. Computers & Education 46:1 (2006), 29–48, 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002.
43. Strijbos, J.W., Van Goozen, B., Prins, F., Developing a coding scheme for analysing peer feedback messages. Paper presented at the EARLI-SIG 1 assessment and evaluation conference, Brussels, Belgium, 2012, August.
44. Stylianides, A.J., Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 38:3 (2007), 289–321, 10.2307/30034869.
45. Stylianides, G.J., Stylianides, A.J., Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 10:2 (2008), 103–133.
46. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed., 2013, Pearson, Essex, England.
47. Tapan, M.S., Arslan, C., Preservice teachers’ use of spatio-visual elements and their level of justification dealing with a geometrical construction problem. US-China Education Review A 6:3 (2009), 54–60.
48. Tsovaltzi, D., Melis, E., McLaren, B.M., Meyer, A.K., Dietrich, M., Goguadze, G., Learning from erroneous examples: When and how do students benefit from them?. Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V., (eds.) Sustaining TEL: From innovation to learning and practice, Vol. 3683, 2010, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 357–373.
49. Ufer, S., Heinze, A., Reiss, K., Mental models and the development of geometric proof competency. Tzekaki, M., Kaldrimidou, M., Sakonidis, C., (eds.) Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 5, 2009, PME, Thessaloniki, Greece, 257–264.
50. Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., Van den Bergh, H., The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL. Learning and Instruction 20:4 (2010), 316–327, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009.
51. Wilcox, R., Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. 3rd ed., 2012, Elsevier, Oxford, England.
52. Wilcox, R.R., Tian, T.S., Measuring effect size: A robust heteroscedastic approach for two or more groups. Journal of Applied Statistics 38:7 (2011), 1359–1368, 10.1080/02664763.2010.498507.
53. Yang, K.L., Lin, F.L., A model of reading comprehension of geometry proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics 67:1 (2008), 59–76, 10.1007/s10649-007-9080-6.
54. Zerr, J.M., Zerr, R.J., Learning from their mistakes: Using student's incorrect proofs as a pedagogical tool. Primus 21:6 (2011), 530–544, 10.1080/105119709033869.