Role of questions in inquiry-based instruction: towards a design taxonomy for question-asking and implications for design

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 653-678

  Tawfik, Andrew A ^a   Graesser, Arthur ^a   Gatewood, Jessica ^a   Gishbaugher, Jaclyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Deep learning; Inquiry based instruction; Problem based learning; Problem solving; Question asking; Questions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078164175     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09738-9     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11.
2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Hamilton, R. L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the author: A year-long classroom implementation to engage students with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
3. Belland, B., Walker, A., Kim, N., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344.
4. Blumberg, F. C., Rosenthal, S. F., & Randall, J. D. (2008). Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1530–1541.
5. Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152.
6. Chi, M., & VanLehn, K. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 177–188.
7. Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 483–511.
8. Clariana, R. B. (2010). Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays. In Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 117–130). Boston, MA.: Springer.
9. Dabbagh, N., & Dass, S. (2013). Case problems for problem-based pedagogical approaches: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 64, 161–174.
10. Dillon, J. T. (1984). The classification of research questions. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 327–361.
11. Dillon, J. T. (2004). Questioning and teaching: A manual of practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Pres.
12. Dumas, D. (2017). Relational reasoning in science, medicine, and engineering. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 73–95.
13. Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., Baker, L. M., Jablansky, S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Relational reasoning in medical education: Patterns in discourse and diagnosis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1021.
14. Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., & Pucite, L. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1–12.
15. Ertmer, P., & Koehler, A. A. (2018). Facilitation strategies and problem space coverage: Comparing face-to-face and online case-based discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 639–670.
16. Ertmer, P., Stepich, D. A., York, C. S., Stickman, A., Wu, X. L., Zurek, S., et al. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(1), 17–42.
17. Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Validation study of a method for assessing complex ill-structured problem solving by using causal representations. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 61(3), 443–463.
18. Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237.
19. Ferguson, W., Bareiss, R., Birnbaum, L., & Osgood, R. (1992). ASK systems: An approach to the realization of story-based teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 95–134.
20. Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133–142.
21. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2008). Negative knowledge: Understanding professional learning and expertise. Vocations and Learning, 1(2), 87–103.
22. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010). Workplace errors and negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 5–25.
23. Gartmeier, M., Pfurtscheller, T., Hapfelmeier, A., Grünewald, M., Häusler, J., Seidel, T., et al. (2019). Teacher questions and student responses in case-based learning: Outcomes of a video study in medical education. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 455.
24. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.
25. Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 1–11.
26. Glazewski, K. D., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2018). Scaffolding and supporting use of information for ambitious learning practices. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(1), 39–58.
27. Graesser, A. C., Cai, Z., Louwerse, M. M., & Daniel, F. (2006). Question understanding aid (QUAID): A web facility that tests question comprehensibility. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(1), 3–22.
28. Graesser, A. C., Greenberg, D., Olney, A., & Lovett, M. (2019). Educational technologies that support reading comprehension for adults who have low literacy skills. In D. Perin (Ed.), Wiley adult literacy handbook (pp. 471–493). New York: Wiley.
29. Graesser, A. C., Gordon, S. E., & Brainerd, L. E. (1992). QUEST: A model of question answering. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 23(6), 733–745.
30. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point & Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 225–234.
31. Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524–536.
32. Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Csapó, B., Demetriou, A., Hautamäki, J., Graesser, A. C., et al. (2014). Domain-general problem solving skills and education in the 21st century. Educational Research Review, 13, 74–83.
33. Herrington, J., & Reeves, T. C. (2017). Keep it real: The benefits of authentic tasks in contemporary learning environments. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 296–302). New York, NY: Pearson.
34. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 453–464). New York, NY: Springer.
35. Hmelo-Silver, C. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. 10.7771/1541-5015.1334.
36. Hmelo-Silver, C., & Barrows, H. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39.
37. Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. (2007a). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
38. Hmelo-Silver, C., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007b). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert–novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307–331.
39. Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three dimensions of reflective thinking in solving design problems: A conceptual model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687–710.
40. Hou, H.-T. (2011). A case study of online instructional collaborative discussion activities for problem-solving using situated scenarios: An examination of content and behavior cluster analysis. Computers & Education, 56(3), 712–719.
41. Huang, K., Ge, X., & Law, V. (2017). Deep and surface processing of instructor’s feedback in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 247–260.
42. Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: Tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61.
43. Iordanou, K., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., Shi, Y., & Hemberger, L. (2019). Learning by arguing. Learning and Instruction, 63, 1–10.
44. Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6(3), 41–49.
45. Jeong, A., & Lee, W. J. (2012). Developing causal understanding with causal maps: The impact of total links, temporal flow, and lateral position of outcome nodes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(2), 325–340.
46. Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265.
47. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.
48. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
49. Jonassen, D. H. (2011a). ASK systems: Interrogative access to multiple ways of thinking. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(1), 159–175.
50. Jonassen, D. H. (2011b). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
51. Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28.
52. Ju, H., & Choi, I. (2017). The role of argumentation in hypothetico-deductive reasoning during problem-based learning in medical education: A conceptual framework. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1), 1–17.
53. Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561–579.
54. Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40(4), 651–672.
55. Kapur, M. (2014). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651–677.
56. Kim, K. (2017). Graphical interface of knowledge structure: A web-based research tool for representing knowledge structure in text (pp. 1–7). Knowledge and Learning: Technology.
57. Kim, N. J., Belland, B., & Walker, A. E. (2017). Effectiveness of computer-based scaffolding in the context of problem-based learning for STEM education: Bayesian meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 397–429.
58. Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2019). Scaffolding for optimal challenge in K-12 problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. 10.7771/1541-5015.1712.
59. Kolodner, J., Owensby, J., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed., pp. 829–861). LEA.
60. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
61. Lauer, T., Peacock, E., & Graesser, A. (1992). Questions and information systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 1–38.
63. Lehnert, W. G. (1978). The process of question answering: A computer simulation of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Lin, X., Hmelo-Silver, C., Kinzer, C., & Secules, T. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62.
65. Loyens, S., & Rikers, R. (2011). Instruction based on inquiry. In R. Mayer & R. Rikers (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 361–381). New York, NY: Routledge Press.
66. Malkiewich, L. J., & Chase, C. C. (2019). What’s your goal? The importance of shaping the goals of engineering tasks to focus learners on the underlying science. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09493-2
67. McIntyre, N. A., & Foulsham, T. (2018). Scanpath analysis of expertise and culture in teacher gaze in real-world classrooms. Instructional Science, 46(3), 435–455.
68. McIntyre, N. A., Mainhard, M. T., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Are you looking to teach? Cultural, temporal and dynamic insights into expert teacher gaze. Learning and Instruction, 49, 41–53.
69. Nussbaum, E. M., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2016). The psychology of far transfer from classroom argumentation. The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion (pp. 407–423). London: College Publications.
70. Olney, A. M., Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (2012). Question generation from concept maps. Dialogue & Discourse, 3(2), 75–99.
71. Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 143–175.
72. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Basic Books.
73. Rong, H., & Choi, I. (2018). Integrating failure in case-based learning: A conceptual framework for failure classification and its instructional implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 617–637.
74. Rusnak, P., Dobson, T., & Boskic, N. (2008). Articulation of ecological values in alternate reality gaming: A case study of World Without Oil. In Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on games based learning, 383. researchgate.net.
75. Schank, R. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Schon, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think In action (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books.
77. Schmidt, M., Rietta, C., Glaser, N., Riedy, T., Wetter, S., Gutierrez-Colina, A., Wagner, J., Smith, G., Huszti, H., Patel, A., & Modi, A. C. (2020). Epilepsy Adherence in Children and Technology (eACT) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://eactportal.org
78. Si, J., Kong, H.-H., & Lee, S.-H. (2018). Developing clinical reasoning skills through argumentation with the concept map method in medical problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 1–16.
79. Stefaniak, J. E., & Tracey, M. W. (2014). An examination of the decision-making process used by designers in multiple disciplines. TechTrends, 58(5), 80–89.
80. Tamim, S., & Grant, M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. 10.7771/1541-5015.1323.
81. Tawfik, A. A., & Jonassen, D. H. (2013). The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(3), 385–406.
82. Tawfik, A. A., Gill, A., Hogan, M., York, C. S., & Keene, C. W. (2019). How novices use expert case libraries for problem solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 23–40.
83. Tawfik, A. A., Rong, H., & Choi, I. (2015). Failing to learn: Towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 975–994.
84. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. Lajoie & S. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Valentine, K. D., & Kopcha, T. J. (2016). The embodiment of cases as alternative perspective in a mathematics hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1183–1206.
86. van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education, 64, 153–160.
87. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39–61.
88. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
89. VanLehn, K. (1988). Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning. In D. H. Mandl & D. A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer.
90. Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457–488.
91. Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, C., Spector, N.-S., & Michael, J. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 68(Supplement C), 293–306.
92. Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28.
93. Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428.
94. Wijnen, M., Loyens, S., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & Van der Mollen, H. (2017). Students’ and teachers’ experiences with the implementation of problem-based learning at a university law school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 1–11.
95. Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., Derous, E., & Schmidt, H. G. (2016). University teacher judgments in problem-based learning: Their accuracy and reasoning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 203–212.
96. Wilder, S. (2015). Impact of problem-based learning on academic achievement in high school: A systematic review. Educational Review, 67(4), 414–435.
97. Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., van den Bogert, N., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: Expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44(3), 243–265.
98. Wosinski, J., Belcher, A. E., Dürrenberger, Y., Allin, A.-C., Stormacq, C., & Gerson, L. (2018). Facilitating problem-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 60, 67–74.