The role of planning in complex problem solving

Computers and Education

Volumn 128, Issue , 2019, Pages 1-12

  Eichmann, Beate ^a   Goldhammer, Frank ^a   Greiff, Samuel ^b   Pucite, Liene ^c   Naumann, Johannes ^d  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complex problem solving; Computer based assessment; Log data; PISA; Planning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PLANNING;

BEHAVIORAL MEASURES; COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING; COMPUTER-BASED ASSESSMENTS; INTERACTION EFFECT; LOG DATA; PISA; PLANNING BEHAVIORS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 85053553018     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albert, D., Steinberg, L., Age differences in strategic planning as indexed by the tower of London. Child Development 82:5 (2011), 1501–1517 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01613.x.
2. Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., Bates, D.M., Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59:4 (2008), 390–412 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
3. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 2015 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
4. Baxter, G.P., Glaser, R., An approach to analyzing the cognitive complexity of science performance assessments: CSE technical report 452. Los angeles. Retrieved from National Center for Research on Evaluation (Los Angeles), website https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TECH452.pdf, 1997.
5. Blech, C., Funke, J., Dynamis review: An overview about applications of the Dynamis approach in cognitive psychology. Retrieved from Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung website http://www.die-bonn.de/esprid/dokumente/doc-2005/blech05_01.pdf, 2005.
6. Blech, C., Funke, J., You cannot have your cake and eat it, too: How induced goal conflicts affect complex problem solving. The Open Psychology Journal 3 (2010), 42–53 Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/6867/1/Blech%26Funke_2010_Polytely.pdf.
7. Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., Walraven, A., A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education 53:4 (2009), 1207–1217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004.
8. Bransford, J., Brown, A.L., Cockling, R.R., How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. 1999, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
9. Buchner, A., Basic topics and approaches to the study of complex problem solving. Frensch, P.A., Funke, J., (eds.) Complex problem solving: The European perspective, 1995, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 27–63.
10. Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-H., Chiu, B.-C., Liu, C.-C., Fan Chiang, S.-H., Wen, C.-T., et al. An analysis of student collaborative problem solving activities mediated by collaborative simulations. Computers & Education 114 (2017), 222–235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.008.
11. De Boeck, P., Bakker, M., Zwitser, R., Nivard, M., Hofman, A., Tuerlinckx, F., et al. The estimation of item response models with the lmer function from the lme4 package in R. Journal of Statistical Software 39:12 (2011), 1–28 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v039.i12.
12. Dörner, D., Die Logik des mißlingens: Strategisches Denken in komplexen situationen (17. - 19. Tsd). 1989, Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg.
13. Fischer, A., Greiff, S., Funke, J., The process of solving complex problems. The Journal of Problem Solving 4:1 (2012), 19–42 https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1118.
14. Frensch, P.A., Funke, J., Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. Frensch, P.A., Funke, J., (eds.) Complex problem solving: The European perspective, 1995, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 24–43.
15. Funke, J., Frensch, P.A., Complex problem solving: The European perspective-10 Years after. Jonassen, D.H., (eds.) Learning to solve complex scientific problems, 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, 25–47.
16. Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Greiff, S., More is not always better: The relation between item response and item response time in Raven's matrices. Journal of Intelligence 3:1 (2015), 21–40 https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3010021.
17. Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Stelter, A., Tóth, K., Rölke, H., Klieme, E., The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology 106:3 (2014), 608–626 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034716.
18. Greiff, S., Funke, J., Indikatoren der Problemlöseleistung: Sinn und Unsinn verschiedener Berechnungsvorschriften: Bericht aus dem MicroDYN Projekt. 2008.
19. Greiff, S., Niepel, C., Scherer, R., Martin, R., Understanding students’ performance in a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving: An analysis of behavioral data from computer-generated log files. Computers in Human Behavior 61 (2016), 36–46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.095.
20. Klieme, E., Assessment of cross‐curricular problem‐solving competencies. Moskowitz, J.H., Stephens, M., Moskowitz, J., Stephens, M., (eds.) Comparing learning outcomes: International assessment and education policy, 2004, Routledge Falmer, London, 81–107.
21. Lesh, R., Zawojewski, J., Problem solving and modeling. Lester, F.K., (eds.) The handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2007, 763–804.
22. Leutner, D., Funke, J., Klieme, E., Wirth, J., Problemlösefähigkeit als fächerübergreifende Kompetenz. Klieme, E., Leutner, D., Wirth, J., (eds.) Problemlösekompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern: Diagnostische Ansätze, theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Befunde der deutschen PISA-2000-Studie, 1st ed., 2005, VS Verl. für Sozialwiss, Wiesbaden, 11–19.
23. Mayer, R.E., Wittrock, M.C., Problem solving. Alexander, P.A., Winne, P.H., (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd ed., 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J, 287–304.
24. Naumann, J., Goldhammer, F., Time-on-task effects in digital reading are non-linear and moderated by persons’ skills and tasks’ demands. Learning and Individual Differences 53 (2017), 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.002.
25. Naumann, J., Goldhammer, F., Rölke, H., Stelter, A., Erfolgreiches Problemlösen in technologiebasierten Umgebungen: Wechselwirkungen zwischen Interaktionsschritten und Aufgabenanforderungen. Zeitschrift für Padagogische Psychologie 28:4 (2014), 193–203 https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000134.
26. Novick, L.R., Bassok, M., Problem solving. Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G., (eds.) The cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 321–349.
27. OECD, PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. PISA, 2013, OECD, Paris.
28. OECD, Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. 2015, OECD, Paris.
29. Osman, M., Controlling uncertainty: A review of human behavior in complex dynamic environments. Psychological Bulletin 136:1 (2010), 65–86 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017815.
30. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2016, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
31. Reeff, J., Zabal, A., Blech, C., The assessment of problem-solving competencies: A draft version of a general framework. Retrieved from Deutsches Institut für Erwachsenenbildung website http://www.die-bonn.de/esprid/dokumente/doc-2006/reeff06_01.pdf, 2006.
32. Rouet, J.-F., Le Bigot, L., Effects of academic training on metatextual knowledge and hypertext navigation. Metacognition and Learning 2:2–3 (2007), 157–168 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9011-z.
33. Unterrainer, J.M., Owen, A.M., Planning and problem solving: From neuropsychology to functional neuroimaging. Journal of Physiology Paris 99:4–6 (2006), 308–317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.014.
34. Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Similarity and analogical reasoning. 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
35. Wirth, J., Klieme, E., Computer-based assessment of problem solving competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 10:3 (2003), 329–345 https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000148172.