Deep and surface processing of instructor's feedback in an online course

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 247-260

  Huang, Kun ^a   Ge, Xun ^b   Law, Victor ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Approaches to learning; Deep learning; Epistemic beliefs; Feedback; Need for closure; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032229882     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive psychology and its implementations. New York, NY: Worth Publishers
2. Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A Systematic review on the development of students' deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 205-234. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
3. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research
4. Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A Theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19
5. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A Comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138
6. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
7. DeBacker, T. K., & Crowson, H. M. (2006). Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 535-551
8. Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 499-567
9. Dolmans, D., Loyens, S., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A Review of the literature. Advances in Health Science Education, 21(5), 1087-1112. doi:10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
10. Entwistle, N. (2000, November). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. Paper presented at the First Annual Conference of the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme, Leicester, UK
11. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London, UK: Croom Helm
12. García, T., Rodríguez, C., Betts, L., Areces, D., & González-Castro, P. (2016). How affective-motivational variables and approaches to learning predict mathematics achievement in upper elementary levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 25-31
13. Ge, X., & Land, S. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38
14. Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), 11. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1622
15. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192
16. Harlow, L., DeBacker, T., & Crowson, H. M. (2011). Need for closure, achievement goals, and cognitive engagement in high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 110-119
17. Hofer, B. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 378-405
18. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The Development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140
19. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94
20. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychology Inquiry, 1, 181-197
21. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: Seizing and freezing. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283
22. Marton, F. (1983). Beyond individual differences. Educational Psychology, 3(3&4), 289-303
23. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On Qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11
24. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On Qualitative differences in learning: II-Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115-127
25. Muis, K. R. (2007). The Role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190
26. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90-94
27. Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435-443
28. Sinnott, J. D. (1989). A Model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and application (pp. 72-99). New York, NY: Praeger
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
30. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The Effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 279-294
31. Vos, N., van der Meijden, H., & Denessen, E. (2011). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 56, 127-137
32. Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1988). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi & R. Glaser (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum