Deriving individual and group knowledge structure from network diagrams and from essays

Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 117-130

  Clariana, Roy B ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept maps; Essays; Knowledge structure; Network diagrams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892786626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_7     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Cernusca, D. (2007). A design-based research approach to the implementation and examination of a cognitive flexibility hypertext. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia. Downloaded November 11, 2008, from http://edt.missouri.edu/Summer 2007/Dissertation/CernuscaD- 071907-D8036/research.pdf
2. Clariana, R. B. (2002). ALA-Mapper software, version 1.01. Retrieved September 28, 2008, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/ala.htm
3. Clariana, R. B. (2004). ALA-Reader software, version 1.01. Retrieved December 24, 2008, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/rbc4/score.htm
4. Clariana, R. B., & Koul, R. (2004). A computer-based approach for translating text into concept map-like representations. In A. J.Canas, J. D.Novak, & F. M.Gonzales (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology, vol. 2, in the Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain, Sep. 14-17, pp. 131-134. See http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-045.pdf.
5. Clariana, R. B., & Koul, R. (2008). The effects of learner prior knowledge when creating concept maps from a text passage. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35, 229-236
6. Clariana, R. B., Koul, R., & Salehi, R. (2006). The criterion-related validity of a computer-based approach for scoring concept maps. International Journal ofInstructional Media, 33, 317-325.
7. Clariana, R. B., & Poindexter, M. T. (2003). The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing on structural knowledge. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA, April 2003.
8. Clariana, R. B., & Taricani, E. M. (2010). The consequences of increasing the number of terms used to score open-ended concept maps. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37(2), 218-226.
9. Clariana, R. B., & Wallace, P. E. (2007). A computer-based approach for deriving and measuring individual and team knowledge structure from essay questions. Journal ofEducational Computing Research, 37, 209-225.
10. Clariana, R. B., Wallace, P. E., & Godshalk, V. M. (2008). Deriving and measuring group knowledge structure via computer-based analysis of essay questions: The effects of controlling anaphoric reference. In D. G. Kinshuk, J. M. Sampson, P. Spector, D. Isalas, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (pp. 88-95). Freiburg, Germany: International Association for Development of the Information Society.
11. Dearholt, D. W., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Properties of pathfinder networks. In Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 1-30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
12. Derbentseva, N., Safayeni, F., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 448-165.
13. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Bowers, C. A., & Stevens, D. T. (1984). Memory for prose: The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 133-143.
14. Goldsmith, T. E., & Davenport, D. M. (1990). Assessing structural similarity of graphs. In Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 75-87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
15. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing knowledge structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
16. Gonzalvo, P., Canas, J. J., & Bajo, M. (1994). Structural representations in knowledge acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 601-616.
17. Harper, M. E., Hoeft, R. M., Evans, A. W. III, & Jentsch, F. G. (2004). Scoring concepts maps: Can a practical method of scoring concept maps be used to assess trainee's knowledge structures? Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 48, 2599-2603.
18. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Kinchin, I. M., & Hay, D. B. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42, 43-57.
20. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation ofmeaning in memory. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychology Review, 85, 363-394.
22. KNOT (1998). Knowledge Network and Orientation Tool for the Personal Computer, version 4.3. Retrieved October 3, 2003 from http://interlinkinc.net/
23. Koul, R., Clariana, R. B., & Salehi, R. (2005). Comparing several human and computer-based methods for scoring concept maps and essays. Journal ofEducational Computing Research, 32, 261-273.
24. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 331-367.
25. Lim, K. Y., Lee, H. W., & Grabowski, B. (2008). Does concept-mapping strategy work for everyone? The levels of generativity and learners' self-regulated learning skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 606-618.
26. Lomask, M., Baron, J. B., Greig, J., & Harrison, C. (1992, March). ConnMap: Connecticut's use of concept mapping to assess the structure of students' knowledge of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, in Cambridge, MA.
27. Poindexter, M. T., & Clariana, R. B. (2006). The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing on structural knowledge and traditional learning outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33, 177-184.
28. Schvaneveldt, R. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
29. Taricani, E. M., & Clariana, R. B. (2006). A technique for automatically scoring open-ended concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 61-78.