Comparing Learning From Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 651-677

  Kapur, Manu ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920097565     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2013.819000     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399–432.
2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(2): 117–160.
5. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4): 385–398.
6. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.
7. Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
8. Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38, 523–550.
9. Kapur, M. (2011a). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39, 561–579.
10. Kapur, M. (2011b). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 39–56.
11. Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40, 651–672.
12. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
13. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 45–83.
14. Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1): 21–46.
15. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650.
16. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2): 306–314.
17. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2): 75–86.
18. Lehtinen, E., & Hannula, M. M. (2006). Attentional processes, abstraction and transfer in early mathematical processes. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp. 39–55). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
19. Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90.
20. Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 499–535.
21. Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for achieving transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
22. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
23. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared to what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 529–544.
24. Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Outcomes and mechanisms of transfer in invention activities. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2824–2829). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
25. Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). The invention lab: Using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 115–124). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
26. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4): 207–217.
27. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16,475–522.
28. Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
29. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
30. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
31. Terwel, J., van Oers, B., van Dijk, I. M. A. W., & van den Eeden, P. (2009). Are representations to be provided or generated in primary mathematics education? Effects on transfer. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 25–44.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). New evidence on productive failure—Building on students’ prior knowledge is key! In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 266–270). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
34. Wiedmann, M., Leach, R. C., Rummel, N., & Wiley, J. (2012). Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science, 40, 711–730.