The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 385-406

  Tawfik, Andrew ^a   Jonassen, David ^b  

^a Department of Health and Human Performance   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Case libraries; Case based reasoning; Decision making; Failure; Failure driven memory; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878106021     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-013-9294-5     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1996). Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and systems approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7(1), 39-59.
2. Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374-400. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1551-6709. 2009. 01017. x.
3. Barrows, H. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
4. Barrows, H. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(68), 3-12.
5. Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
6. Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. (2007). Modelling learning from errors in daily work. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6(3), 121-133.
7. Dunlap, J., & Grabinger, R. S. (1996). Rich environments for active learning in the higher education classroom. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 65-82). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.
8. Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857-871.
9. Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Davidi, I. (2006). Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 669-680.
10. Fullerton, A. S. (2009). A conceptual framework for ordered logistic regression models. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(2), 306-347. doi: 10. 1177/0049124109346162.
11. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2008). Negative knowledge: Understanding professional learning and expertise. Vocations and Learning, 1(2), 87-103. doi: 10. 1007/s12186-008-9006-1.
12. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010). Workplace errors and negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 5-25.
13. Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27-61. doi: 10. 3102/00346543075001027.
14. Gore, D. C. (2006). National survey of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences. The American Journal of Surgery, 191(5), 708-714. doi: 10. 1016/j. amjsurg. 2006. 01. 029.
15. Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 103-114.
16. Hoeve, A., & Nieuwenhuis, L. F. (2006). Learning routines in innovation processes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(3), 171-185.
17. Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 81-97.
18. Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2007). Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels. Computers & Education, 48(3), 427-445. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2005. 02. 002.
19. Jeong, A. C., & Lee, J. (2008). The effects of active versus reflective learning style on the processes of critical discourse in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 651-665.
20. Jonassen, D. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.
21. Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
22. Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.
23. Jonassen, D. H., & Cho, Y. (2011). Fostering argumentation while solving engineering ethics problems. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 680-702.
24. Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65-77.
25. Jonassen, D., & Hung, W. (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77-114.
26. Jonassen, D., & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 2(2), 6-28.
27. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 161-179.
28. Kolodner, J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 6(1), 3-34. doi: 10. 1007/BF00155578.
29. Kolodner, J. L., Cox, M., & Gonzalez-Calero, P. (2005). Case-based reasoning-inspired approaches to education. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 20(3), 299-303. doi: 10. 1017/S0269888906000634.
30. Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 829-861). Mahwah: LEA.
31. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337. doi: 10. 1002/sce. 3730770306.
32. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260.
33. Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(2), 90-104.
34. Lin, T.-J., & Anderson, R. C. (2008). Reflections on collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 443-448. doi: 10. 1016/j. cedpsych. 2008. 06. 002.
35. Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291-309. doi: 10. 1037/0022-0663. 100. 2. 291.
36. Mathan, S., & Koedinger, K. (2005). Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with metacognitive tutoring. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 257-265.
37. Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-565.
38. Nussbaum, M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359. doi: 10. 1016/j. cedpsych. 2008. 06. 001.
39. Nussbaum, M., & Schraw, G. (2007). Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students' writing. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(1), 59-92.
40. Nussbaum, M., Kardash, C. A. M., & Graham, S. E. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 157.
41. Parviainen, J., & Eriksson, M. (2006). Negative knowledge, expertise and organisations. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2(2), 140-153.
42. Popper, K. (1987). All life is problem solving. London: Routledge.
43. Rosenfeld, J. C. (2005). Using the morbidity and mortality conference to teach and assess the ACGME general competencies. Current Surgery, 62(6), 664-669. doi: 10. 1016/j. cursur. 2005. 06. 009.
44. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
45. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
46. Schank, R. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Schank, R., Berman, T., & Macpherson, K. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. 241-261). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Schrader, P. G., Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Ataya, R., Teale, W. H., Labbo, L. D., et al. (2003). Using Internet delivered video cases, to support pre-service teachers' understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science, 31(4), 317-340. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1024690111227.
49. Seel, N. (2008). Empirical perspectives on memory and motivation. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 659-670). New York: Routledge.
50. Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318-328. doi: 10. 2307/30040715.
51. Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231-266.
52. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Tech Report No. 441. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
53. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421-447. doi: 10. 1007/s11412-007-9028-y.
54. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 506-515. doi: 10. 1016/j. chb. 2009. 08. 007.