A meta-review of the student role in feedback

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 98, Issue , 2019, Pages 303-323

  Van der Kleij, Fabienne M ^a   Adie, Lenore E ^a   Cumming, J Joy ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feedback; Formative assessment; Meta review; Student role

Indexed keywords

EID: 85072762771     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. *Afitska, O. (2014). Use of formative assessment, self- and peer-assessment in the classrooms: Some insights from recent language testing and assessment (LTA) research. Journal on English Language Teaching, 4, 29–39. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/91775/
2. *Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
3. *Allal, L., & Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In J. Looney (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241–264). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/34488354.pdf
4. *Baird, J-A., Hopfenbeck, T. N., Newton, P., Stobart, G., & Steen-Utheim, A. T. (2014). Assessment and learning: State of the field review. Lysaker, Norway: Knowledge Centre for Education. Retrieved from https://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Rapport&cid=1253996755700&lang=en&pagename=kunnskapssenter%2FHovedsidemal
5. *Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002213
6. *Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
7. *Bing-You, R., Varaklis, K., Hayes, V., Trowbridge, R., Kemp, H., & McKelvy, D. (2018). The feedback tango: An integrative review and analysis of the content of the teacher-learner feedback exchange. Academic Medicine, 93, 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001927
8. *Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
9. *Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
10. Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In R. W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 68, Part 2, pp. 26–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
11. *Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
12. *Brookhart, S. M. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1002_4
13. *Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 429–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00346.x
14. *Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. In J. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment, theory into practice (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Teachers College.
15. *Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Summative and formative feedback. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback (pp. 52–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.005
16. Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343711
17. *Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
18. *Butler, A. C. & Woodward, N. R. (2018). Toward consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning. In K. D. Federmeier (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 1–39). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001
19. *Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
20. *Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
21. *Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438–481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
22. *Elshout-Mohr, M. (1994). Feedback in self-instruction. European Education, 26, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934260258
23. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
24. *Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
25. *Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 121–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6
26. *Fyfe, E. R., & Brown, S. A. (2018). Feedback influences children's reasoning about math equivalence: A meta-analytic review. Thinking & Reasoning, 24, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1359208
27. *Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., Krannich, M., & Gogol, K. (2018). Performance feedback and emotions. In A. A. Lipnevich & J. K. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback (pp. 554–574). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316832134.027
28. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Tomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London, England: Sage.
29. *Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115, 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
30. Hattie, J., Gan, M., & Brooks, C. (2017). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (2nd ed., pp. 290-324). London, UK: Routledge.
31. *Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050107
32. *Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
33. *Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
34. *Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543063.pdf
35. *Higgins, N. C. (1973, February–March). Feedback in instruction: A review and suggestions for further research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
36. *Jackel, B., Pearce, J., Radloff, A., & Edwards, D. (2017). Assessment and feedback in higher education: A review of literature for the Higher Education Academy. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.
37. *Johnson, M. (2016). Feedback effectiveness in professional learning contexts. Review of Education, 4, 195–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3061
38. *Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787412467125
39. *Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
40. *Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1998). Feedback interventions: Toward the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772989
41. *Köller, O. (2005). Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of empirical German literature. In J. Looney (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 265-2 79). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/34488377.pdf
42. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
43. *Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211
44. *Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320096
45. *Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079
46. *Lam, R. (2017). Enacting feedback utilization from a task-specific perspective. The Curriculum Journal, 28, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1187185
47. *Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709494
48. *Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., & Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
49. *López-Pastor, V., & Sicilia-Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
50. *Lysakowski, R. S., & Walberg, H. (1982). Instructional effects of cues, participation, and corrective feedback: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 559–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019004559
51. *Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2015). Developing young adolescents’ self-regulation by means of formative assessment: A theoretical perspective. Cogent Education, 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1071233
52. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2007). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
53. *Mory, E. H. (1992). The use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296839
54. *Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 919–956). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
55. *Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 745–783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. *Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20, 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816644940
57. *Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2202_4
58. *Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
59. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/35661078.pdf
60. *Parboteeah, S., & Anwar, M. (2009). Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: Implications for nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 29, 753–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.017
61. *Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050105
62. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
63. Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. London, England: Bloomsbury.
64. *Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
65. *Rust, C., O'Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500063819
66. *Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instruc tional Science, 18,119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
67. *Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., & Dolmans, D. (2018). A review of educational dialogue strategies to improve academic writing skills. Active Learning in Higher Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418810663
68. *Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
69. *Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Education Research Review, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
70. *Tierney, R. D., & Charland, J. (2007, April). Stocks and prospects: Research on formative assessment in secondary classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
71. *Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
72. *Van de Ridder, J. M., McGaghie, W. C., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. T. (2015). Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: A meta-review. Medical Education, 49, 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12744
73. *Van de Ridder, J. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & ten Cate, O. T. (2008). What is feedback in clinical education? Medical Education, 42, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
74. *Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22, 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999024
75. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314564881
76. White, H. D. (1994). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 41–55). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
77. *Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
78. *Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. McMillan (Eds.), Formative classroom assessment, theory into practice (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Teachers College.
79. *Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
80. *Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413