Review of assessment feedback

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 378-393

  Li, Jinrui ^a   De Luca, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

assessment feedback; belief; disciplinary writing; practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897749119     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709494     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ashwell T. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of Second Language Writing 9, no. 3: 227-57. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8
2. Bailey R., and M. Garner 2010. Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers' reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education 15, no. 2: 187-98. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620019
3. Beaumont C., M. O'Doherty, and L. Shannon 2011. Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning?. Studies in Higher Education 36, no. 6: 1-17. doi: 10.1080/03075071003731135
4. Bloxham S., and L. Campbell 2010. Generating dialogue in assessment feedback: Exploring the use of interactive cover sheets. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35, no. 3: 291-300. doi: 10.1080/02602931003650045
5. Brinka R., and G. Lautenbach 2011. Electronic assessment in higher education. Educational Studies 37, no. 5: 503-12. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2010.539733
6. Broad B. 2003. What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
7. Brown E., and C. Glover 2006. Evaluating written feedback. In Innovative assessment in higher education, ed. C. Bryan, and K. Clegg, 81-91). Abingdon: Routledge.
8. Carless D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 2: 219-33. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132
9. Carless D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam 2011. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education 36, no. 4: 395-407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
10. Chandler J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, no. 3: 267-96. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
11. Cramp A. 2011. Developing first-year engagement with written feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 12, no. 2: 113-24. doi: 10.1177/1469787411402484
12. Crisp B. R. 2007. Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students' subsequent submission of assessable work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32, no. 5: 571-81. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116912
13. Davis M. 2007. The role of Turnitin within the formative process of academic writing. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 2, no. 2),http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/
14. DeLuca C., and D. A. Klinger 2010. Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates' learning. Assessment in Education 17, no. 4: 419-38.
15. Dysthe O., and K. S. Engelsen 2011. Portfolio practices in higher education in Norway in an international perspective: Macro-, meso- and micro-level influences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 1: 63-79. doi: 10.1080/02602930903197891
16. Fazio L. 2001. The effects of corrections and commentaries on the Journal writing accuracy of minority and majority language students. Journal of Second Language Writing 10, no. 4: 235-49. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X
17. Ferguson P. 2011. Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 1: 51-62. doi: 10.1080/02602930903197883
18. Fisher R., J. Cavanagh, and A. Bowles 2011. Assisting transition to university: Using assessment as a formative learning tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 2: 225-37. doi: 10.1080/02602930903308241
19. Grainger P., K. Purnell, and R. Zipf 2008. Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33, no. 2: 133-42. doi: 10.1080/02602930601125681
20. Guba E., and Y. Lincoln 1989. Fourth generation evaluation, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Handley K., and L. Williams 2011. From copying to learning: Using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 1: 95-108. doi: 10.1080/02602930903201669
22. Harman K., and L. McDowell 2011. Assessment talk in design: The multiple purposes of assessment in HE. Teaching in Higher Education 16, no. 1: 41-52. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507309
23. Hattie J., and H. Timperley 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77, no. 1: 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487
24. Hendry G. D., N. Bromberger, and S. Armstrong 2011. Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: The usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 1: 1-11. doi: 10.1080/02602930903128904
25. Higgins R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton 2002. The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 1: 53-64. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099368
26. Hounsell D., V. McCune, J. Hounsell, and J. Litjens 2008. The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research & Development 27, no. 1: 55-67. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658765
27. Huot B. 2002. (Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning, Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
28. Huxham M. 2007. Fast and effective feedback: Are model answers the answer?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32, no. 6: 601-11. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116946
29. M. R. Ivanic R., R. Clark, and R. Rimmershaw 2000. What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors' written comments. In Student writing in higher education: New contexts, ed. Lea, and B. Stierer, 47-65). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
30. Joughin G. 2008. Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education, London: Springer.
31. M. R. Lea M. R., and B. V. Street 2000. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacy approach. In Student writing in higher education: New contexts, ed. Lea, and B. Stierer, 31-46). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
32. Li J., and R. Barnard 2010. Academic tutors' beliefs about and practices of giving feedback on students' written assignments: A New Zealand case study. Assessing Writing 16, no. 2: 137-48. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.004
33. Lizzio A., and K. Wilson 2008. Feedback on assessment: Students' perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33, no. 3: 263-75. doi: 10.1080/02602930701292548
34. Meyer L. H., S. Davidson, L. McKenzie, M. Rees, H. Anderson, R. Fletcher, and P.M. Johnston 2010. An investigation of tertiary assessment policy and practice: Alignment and contradictions. Higher Education Quarterly 64, no. 3: 331-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00459.x
35. Murtagh L., and N. Baker 2009. Feedback to feed forward: Student response to tutors' written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education 3, no. 1: 20-28.
36. Mutch A. 2003. Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education 4, no. 1: 24-38. doi: 10.1177/1469787403004001003
37. Nicol D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31, no. 2: 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
38. Orrell J. 2006. Feedback on learning achievement: Rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education 11, no. 4: 441-56. doi: 10.1080/13562510600874235
39. Orsmond P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling 2002. The use of exemplars and student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 4: 309-23. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000001337
40. Orsmond P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling 2005. Biology students' utilization of tutors' formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 4: 369-86. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099177
41. Parboteeah S., and M. Anwar 2009. Thematic analysis of written assignment feedback: Implications for nurse education. Nurse Education Today 29, no. 7: 753-57. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.017
42. Pokorny H., and P. Pickford 2010. Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 11, no. 1: 21-30. doi: 10.1177/1469787409355872
43. Poulos A., and M. J. Mahony 2008. Effectiveness of feedback: The students' perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33, no. 2: 143-54. doi: 10.1080/02602930601127869
44. Price M., J. Carroll, B. O' Donovan, and C. Rust 2011. If I was going there I wouldn't start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36, no. 4: 479-92. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883
45. Prowse S., N. Duncan, J. Hughes, and D. Burke 2007. ' do that and I'll raise your grade'. Innovative module design and recursive feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 12, no. 4: 437-45. doi: 10.1080/13562510701415359
46. Read B., B. Francis, and J. Robson 2005. Gender, 'bias', assessment and feedback: Analyzing the written assessment of undergraduate history essays. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 241-60. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063827
47. Reynolds M., and K. Trehan 2000. Assessment: A critical perspective. Studies in Higher Education 25, no. 3: 267-78. doi: 10.1080/03075070050193406
48. C. Russell D. R., and A. Yañez 2003. 'Big picture people rarely become historians': Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives, ed. Bazerman, and D. Russell, 331-62). http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/
49. Rust C., B. O' Donovan, and M. Price 2005. A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 3: 231-40. doi: 10.1080/02602930500063819
50. Sadler D. R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, no. 2: 119-44. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
51. J. J. Sakyi A. A. 2000. Validation of holistic scoring for ESL writing assessment: How raters evaluate compositions. In Fairness and validation in language assessment, ed. Kunnan, 129-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Scaife J., and J. Wellington 2010. Varying perspectives and practices in formative and diagnostic assessment: A case study. Journal of Education for Teaching 36, no. 2: 137-51. doi: 10.1080/02607471003651656
53. Schalkwyk S. 2010. Early assessment: Using a university-wide student support initiative to effect real change. Teaching in Higher Education 15, no. 3: 299-310. doi: 10.1080/13562511003740874
54. Shute V. J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78, no. 1: 153-89. doi: 10.3102/0034654307313795
55. Stern L. A., and A. Solomon 2006. Effective faculty feedback: The road less travelled. Assessing Writing 11, no. 1: 22-41. doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.001
56. Taras M. 2002. Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27, no. 6: 501-10. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000020273
57. Taras M. 2006. Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 365-77. doi: 10.1080/02602930500353038
58. Walker M. 2009. An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34, no. 1: 67-78. doi: 10.1080/02602930801895752
59. Weaver M. R. 2006. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 379-94. doi: 10.1080/02602930500353061