Toward consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

Volumn 69, Issue , 2018, Pages 1-38

  Butler, Andrew C ^a   Woodward, Nathaniel R ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Learning; Task level

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056277940     PISSN: 00797421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001     Document Type: Chapter

References (183)

1. Agarwal, P.K., Karpicke, J.D., Kang, S.H., Roediger, H.L. III, McDermott, K.B., Examining the testing effect with open-and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22:7 (2008), 861–876.
2. Ammons, R.B., Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology 54 (1956), 279–299.
3. Anderson, R.C., Kulhavy, R.W., Andre, T., Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 62 (1971), 148–156.
4. Anderson, R.C., Kulhavy, R.W., Andre, T., Conditions under which feedback facilitates learning from programmed lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1972), 186–188.
5. Anderson, M.C., Neely, J.H., Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. Bjork, E.L., Bjork, R.A., (eds.) Handbook of Perception and Memory: Vol. 10. Memory, 1996, Academic Press, San Diego, 237–313.
6. Andre, T., Thieman, A., Level of adjunct question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology 13 (1988), 296–307.
7. Angell, G.W., The effect of immediate knowledge of quiz results on final examination scores in freshman chemistry. Journal of Educational Research 42 (1949), 391–394.
8. Angell, G.W., Troyer, M.E., A new self-scoring test device for improving instruction. School and Society 67 (1948), 84–85.
9. Arnold, K.M., McDermott, K.B., Free recall enhances subsequent learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20:3 (2013), 507–513.
10. Arnold, K.M., McDermott, K.B., Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 2013, 940.
11. Asch, S.E., A reformulation of the problem of associations. American Psychologist, 24(2), 1969, 92.
12. Atkinson, R.C., Information delay in human learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8 (1969), 507–511.
13. Azevedo, R., Bernard, R.M., A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 13 (1995), 111–128.
14. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A., Morgan, M., The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 61 (1991), 213–238.
15. Battig, W.F., Brackett, H.R., Comparison of anticipation and recall methods in paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports 9 (1961), 59–65.
16. Benjamin, L.T., A history of teaching machines. American Psychologist 43 (1988), 703–712.
17. Benjamin, A.S., Ross, B.H., The causes and consequences of reminding. Benjamin, A.S., (eds.) Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork, 2010, Psychology Press, New York, NY, 71–87.
18. Birenbaum, M., Tatsuoka, K.K., Effects of “on-line” test feedback on the seriousness of subsequent errors. Journal of Educational Measurement 24 (1987), 145–155.
19. Bjork, R.A., Bjork, E.L., A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. Healy, A., Kosslyn, S., Shiffrin, R., (eds.) From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 2, 1992, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 35–67.
20. Bjork, R.A., Dunlosky, J., Kornell, N., Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology 64 (2013), 417–444.
21. Black, P., Wiliam, D., Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice 5 (1998), 7–74.
22. Brackbill, Y., The impairment of learning under immediate reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1 (1964), 199–207.
23. Brackbill, Y., Boblitt, W.E., Davlin, D., Wagner, J.E., Amplitude of response and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (1963), 57–64.
24. Brackbill, Y., Bravos, A., Starr, R.H., Delay-improved retention of a difficult task. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 55 (1962), 947–952.
25. Brackbill, Y., Kappy, M.S., Delay of reinforcement and retention. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 55 (1962), 14–18.
26. Brackbill, Y., Wagner, J., Wilson, D., Feedback delay and the teaching machine. Psychology in the Schools 1 (1964), 148–156.
27. Briggs, G.E., Acquisition, extinction, and recovery functions in retroactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47:5 (1954), 285–293.
28. Buchwald, A.M., Effects of “right” and “wrong” on subsequent behavior: A new interpretation. Psychological Review 76:2 (1969), 132–143.
29. Butler, A.C., Fazio, L.K., Marsh, E.J., The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18:6 (2011), 1238–1244.
30. Butler, A.C., Godbole, N., Marsh, E.J., Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 2013, 290.
31. Butler, A.C., Karpicke, Roediger, H.L. III, The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 13 (2007), 273–281.
32. Butler, A.C., Karpicke, J.D., Roediger, H.L. III, Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34 (2008), 918–928.
33. Butler, A.C., Roediger, H.L. III, Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition 36 (2008), 604–616.
34. Butterfield, B., Mangels, J.A., Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task. Cognitive Brain Research 17:3 (2003), 793–817.
35. Butterfield, B., Metcalfe, J., Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001), 1491–1494.
36. Butterfield, B., Metcalfe, J., The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition Learning 1 (2006), 69–84.
37. Callender, A.A., McDaniel, M.A., The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34:1 (2009), 30–41.
38. Carpenter, S.K., Cepeda, N.J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S.H., Pashler, H., Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review 24:3 (2012), 369–378.
39. Craik, F.I., Tulving, E., Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104:3 (1975), 268–294.
40. Craik, F.I., Watkins, M.J., The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12 (1973), 599–607.
41. Cyr, A.A., Anderson, N.D., Updating misconceptions: Effects of age and confidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20:3 (2013), 574–580.
42. Davachi, L., Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16:6 (2006), 693–700.
43. Dempsey, J.V., Driscoll, M.P., Error and feedback: Relation between content analysis and confidence of response. Psychological Reports 78:3 (1996), 1079–1089.
44. Eich, T.S., Stern, Y., Metcalfe, J., The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 20:5 (2013), 511–521.
45. English, R.A., Kinzer, J.R., The effect of immediate and delayed feedback on retention of subject matter. Psychology in the Schools 3 (1966), 143–147.
46. Estes, W.K., Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62(5), 1955, 369.
47. Fazio, L.K., Huelser, B.J., Johnson, A., Marsh, E.J., Receiving right/wrong feedback: Consequences for learning. Memory 18 (2010), 335–350.
48. Fazio, L.K., Marsh, E.J., Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16:1 (2009), 88–92.
49. Fazio, L.K., Marsh, E.J., Correcting false memories. Psychological Science 21:6 (2010), 801–803.
50. Feldhausen, J.F., Birt, A., A study of nine methods of presentation of programmed learning material. The Journal of Educational Research 5 (1962), 461–466.
51. Foerde, K., Shohamy, D., Feedback timing modulates brain systems for learning in humans. Journal of Neuroscience 31:37 (2011), 13157–13167.
52. Fry, E., Teaching machine dichotomy: Skinner vs. Pressey. Psychological Reports 6 (1960), 11–14.
53. Gilman, D.A., Comparison of several feedback methods for correcting errors by computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (1969), 503–508.
54. Glenberg, A.M., Wilkinson, A.C., Epstein, W., The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition 10:6 (1982), 597–602.
55. Goldstein, I.L., Emanuel, J.T., Howell, W.C., Effect of percentage and specificity of feedback on choice behavior in a probabilistic information-processing task. Journal of Applied Psychology 52 (1968), 163–168.
56. Goss, A.E., Morgan, C.H., Golin, S.J., Paired-associates learning as a function of percentage of occurrence of response members (reinforcement). Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1959), 96–104.
57. Grimaldi, P.J., Karpicke, J.D., When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?. Memory & Cognition 40:4 (2012), 505–513.
58. Guthrie, E., The psychology of learning. 1935, Harper, Oxford, England.
59. Guthrie, J.T., Feedback and sentence learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10 (1971), 23–28.
60. Hancock, T.E., Stock, W.A., Kulhavy, R.W., Predicting feedback effects from response-certitude estimates. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (1992), 173–176.
61. Hattie, J., Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (2007), 81–112.
62. Hays, M.J., Kornell, N., Bjork, R.A., When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(1), 2013, 290.
63. Hintzman, D.L., Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: Repetition and recursive reminding. Memory & Cognition 32:2 (2004), 336–350.
64. Hintzman, D.L., How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency. Memory & Cognition 38:1 (2010), 102–115.
65. Hintzman, D.L., Summers, J.J., Block, R.A., Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1:1 (1975), 31–40.
66. Holland, J.G., Porter, D., The influence of repetition of incorrectly answered items in a teaching machine program. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 4 (1961), 305–307.
67. Hull, C.L., Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. 1943, Appleton-Century, Oxford, England.
68. Iwaki, N., Matsushima, H., Kodaira, K., Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in lexical representations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 117:1 (2013), 219–235.
69. Izawa, C., Reinforcement-test sequences in paired-associate learning. Psychological Reports 18:3 (1966), 879–919.
70. Izawa, C., The test trial potentiating model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 8:2 (1971), 200–224.
71. Jacobs, P.I., Kulkarni, S., A test of some assumptions underlying programmed instruction. Psychological Reports 18 (1966), 103–110.
72. Jensen, B.T., An independent-study laboratory using self-scoring tests. Journal of Educational Research 43 (1949), 134–137.
73. Jones, R.E., Bourne, L.E., Delay of informative feedback in verbal learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology 18 (1964), 266–280.
74. Kang, S.H., Pashler, H., Cepeda, N.J., Rohrer, D., Carpenter, S.K., Mozer, M.C., Does incorrect guessing impair fact learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 2011, 48.
75. Karpicke, J.D., Roediger, H.L., The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 15 (2008), 966–968.
76. Karraker, R.J., Knowledge of results and incorrect recall of plausible multiple-choice alternatives. Journal of Educational Research 58 (1967), 11–14.
77. Kinzie, M.B., Sullivan, H.J., Berdel, R.L., Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (1988), 299–303.
78. Kippel, G.M., Information feedback schedules, interpolated activities, and retention. Journal of Psychology 87 (1974), 245–251.
79. Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A., The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119 (1996), 254–284.
80. Kobayashi, S., Schultz, W., Influence of reward delays on responses of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 28:31 (2008), 7837–7846.
81. Koriat, A., Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (1997), 349–370.
82. Koriat, A., The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review 119 (2012), 80–113.
83. Kornell, N., Hays, M.J., Bjork, R.A., Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 2009, 989.
84. Krumboltz, J.D., Weisman, R.G., The effect of intermittent confirmation in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 53 (1962), 250–253.
85. Kulhavy, R.W., Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research 47 (1977), 211–232.
86. Kulhavy, R.W., Anderson, R.C., Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1972), 505–512.
87. Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review 1 (1989), 279–308.
88. Kulhavy, R.W., Stock, W.A., Hancock, T.E., Swindell, L.K., Hammrich, P.L., Written feedback: Response certitude and durability. Contemporary Educational Psychology 15 (1990), 319–332.
89. Kulhavy, R.W., Yekovich, F.R., Dyer, J.W., Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 68 (1976), 522–528.
90. Kulhavy, R.W., Yekovich, F.R., Dyer, J.W., Feedback and content review in programmed instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology 4 (1979), 91–98.
91. Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C., Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research 58 (1988), 79–97.
92. Landsman, H.J., Turkewitz, M., Delay of knowledge of results and performance on a cognitive task. Psychological Reports, 11, 1962, 66.
93. Lhyle, K.G., Kulhavy, R.W., Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (1987), 320–322.
94. Lintz, L.M., Brackbill, Y., Effects of reinforcement delay during learning on the retention of verbal material in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:2 (1966), 194–199.
95. Little, J.K., Results of use of machines for testing and for drill, upon learning in educational psychology. Journal of Experimental Education 3 (1934), 45–49.
96. Lublin, S.C., Reinforcement schedules, scholastic aptitude, autonomy need, and achievement in a programmed course. Journal of Educational Psychology 56 (1965), 295–302.
97. Mangiapanello, K.A., Hemmes, N.S., An analysis of feedback from a behavior analytic perspective. The Behavior Analyst 38:1 (2015), 51–75.
98. Markowitz, N., Renner, K.E., Feedback and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1966), 452–455.
99. McDaniel, M.A., Fisher, R.P., Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology 16 (1991), 192–201.
100. Melton, A.W., Repetition and retrieval from memory. Science, 158, 1967, 532.
101. Merrill, M.D., Correction and review on successive parts in learning a hierarchical task. Journal of Educational Psychology 56 (1965), 225–234.
102. Metcalfe, J., Butterfield, B., Habeck, C., Stern, Y., Neural correlates of people's hypercorrection of their false beliefs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24:7 (2012), 1571–1583.
103. Metcalfe, J., Finn, B., People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: Did they know it all along?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 2011, 437.
104. Metcalfe, J., Finn, B., Hypercorrection of high confidence errors in children. Learning and Instruction 22:4 (2012), 253–261.
105. Metcalfe, J., Miele, D.B., Hypercorrection of high confidence errors: Prior testing both enhances delayed performance and blocks the return of the errors. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 3:3 (2014), 189–197.
106. Meyer, L.A., Strategies for correcting students' wrong responses. The Elementary School Journal 87 (1986), 227–241.
107. Moore, J.W., Smith, W.I., Knowledge of results in self-teaching spelling. Psychological Reports 9 (1961), 717–726.
108. More, A.J., Delay of feedback and the acquisition and retention of verbal materials in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (1969), 339–342.
109. Moreno, R., Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based media. Instructional Science 32 (2004), 99–113.
110. Morgan, C.L., Morgan, L., Effects of immediate awareness of success and failure upon objective examination scores. Journal of Experimental Education 4 (1935), 63–66.
111. Mory, E.H., Feedback research review. Jonassen, D., (eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2004, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 745–783.
112. Mullet, H.G., Butler, A.C., Verdin, B., von Borries, R., Marsh, E.J., Delaying feedback promotes transfer of knowledge despite student preferences to receive feedback immediately. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 3:3 (2014), 222–229.
113. Murdock, B.B., Human memory: Theory and data. 1974, Erlbaum, Potomac, MD.
114. Nelson, S.M., Arnold, K.M., Gilmore, A.W., McDermott, K.B., Neural signatures of test-potentiated learning in parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 33:29 (2013), 11754–11762.
115. Packard, M.G., Knowlton, B.J., Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25:1 (2002), 563–593.
116. Paige, D.D., Learning while testing. Journal of Educational Research 59 (1966), 276–277.
117. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N.J., Wixted, J.T., Rohrer, D., When does feedback facilitate learning of words?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005), 3–8.
118. Peeck, J., Effects of differential feedback on the answering of two types of questions by fifth- and sixth-graders. British Journal of Educational Psychology 49 (1979), 87–92.
119. Peeck, J., Tillema, H.H., Delay of feedback and retention of correct and incorrect responses. Journal of Experimental Education 47 (1978), 171–178.
120. Peeck, J., Tillema, H.H., Learning from feedback: Comparison of two feedback procedures in a classroom setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills 48 (1979), 351–354.
121. Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A.J., Kreupeling, W.J., Effects of informative feedback in relation to retention of initial responses. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10 (1985), 303–313.
122. Peterson, J.C., A new device for use in teaching, testing, and research in learning. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 33 (1930), 41–47.
123. Phye, G.D., The processing of informative feedback about multiple-choice test performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology 4 (1979), 381–394.
124. Phye, G.D., Baller, W., Verbal retention as a function of the informativeness and delay of informative feedback: A replication. Journal of Educational Psychology 61 (1970), 380–381.
125. Phye, G.D., Bender, T., Feedback complexity and practice: Response pattern analysis in retention and transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology 14 (1989), 97–110.
126. Phye, G.D., Sanders, C.E., Advice and feedback: Elements of practice for problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19 (1994), 286–301.
127. Plowman, L., Stroud, J.B., Effect of informing pupils of the correctness of their responses to objective test questions. Journal of Educational Research 36 (1942), 16–20.
128. Postman, L., Interference theory revisited. Brown, J., (eds.) Recall and recognition, 1976, Wiley, New York, 157–181.
129. Potts, R., Shanks, D.R., The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143:2 (2014), 644–667.
130. Pressey, S.L., A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society 23 (1926), 373–376.
131. Pressey, S.L., A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society 25 (1927), 549–552.
132. Pressey, S.L., A third and fourth contribution toward the coming “industrial revolution” in education. School and Society 36 (1932), 668–672.
133. Pridemore, D.R., Klein, J.D., Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 39 (1991), 27–32.
134. Ripple, R.E., Comparison of the effectiveness of a programmed text with three other methods of presentation. Psychological Reports 12 (1963), 227–237.
135. Roberts, F.C., Park, O., Feedback strategies and cognitive style in computer-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology 11 (1984), 63–74.
136. Roediger, H.L. III, Butler, A.C., The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15:1 (2011), 20–27.
137. Rohrer, D., Pashler, H., Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher 39:5 (2010), 406–412.
138. Roper, W.J., Feedback in computer assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology 14 (1977), 43–49.
139. Rosenstock, E.H., Moore, W.J., Smith, W.I., Effects of several schedules of knowledge of results on mathematics achievement. Psychological Reports 17 (1965), 535–541.
140. Saltzman, I.J., Delay of reward and human verbal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (1951), 437–439.
141. Sassenrath, J.M., Effects of delay of feedback and length of postfeedback interval on retention of prose material. Psychology in the Schools 9 (1972), 194–197.
142. Sassenrath, J.M., Yonge, G.D., Delayed information feedback, feedback cues, retention set, and delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 59 (1968), 69–73.
143. Sassenrath, J.M., Yonge, G.D., Effects of delayed information feedback and feedback cues in learning on delayed retention. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (1969), 174–177.
144. Sassenrath, J.M., Yonge, G.D., Shrable, K., Immediate and delayed feedback on examinations and immediate and delayed retention. California Journal of Educational Research 19 (1968), 226–231.
145. Sax, G., Concept acquisition as a function of differing schedules and delays of reinforcement. Journal of Educational Psychology 51 (1960), 32–36.
146. Schloss, P.J., Sindelar, P.T., Cartwright, G.P., Smith, M.A., Learner control over feedback as a variable in computer assisted instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 20 (1988), 310–320.
147. Schulz, R.W., Runquist, W.N., Learning and retention of paired adjectives as a function of percentage occurrence of response members. Journal of Experimental Psychology 59 (1960), 409–413.
148. Shohamy, D., Wagner, A.D., Integrating memories in the human brain: Hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events. Neuron 60:2 (2008), 378–389.
149. Shute, V., Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 (2008), 153–189.
150. Sitzman, D.M., Rhodes, M.G., Tauber, S.K., Prior knowledge is more predictive of error correction than subjective confidence. Memory & Cognition 42:1 (2014), 84–96.
151. Sitzman, D.M., Rhodes, M.G., Tauber, S.K., Liceralde, V.R.T., The role of prior knowledge in error correction for younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 22:4 (2015), 502–516.
152. Skinner, B.F., The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. 1938, Appleton-Century, Oxford, England.
153. Skinner, B.F., The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review 24 (1954), 86–97.
154. Skinner, B.F., Teaching machines. Science 128 (1958), 969–977.
155. Slamecka, N.J., Fevreiski, J., The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Memory and Language, 22(2), 1983, 153.
156. Smith, E.E., Barresi, J., Gross, A.E., Imaginal versus verbal coding and the primary-secondary memory distinction. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10 (1971), 597–603.
157. Smith, T.A., Kimball, D.R., Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay–retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 2010, 80.
158. Stephens, A.L., Certain special factors involved in the law of effect. Lumsdaine, A.A., Glaser, R., (eds.) Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book, 1960, National Education Association, Washington, DC, 89–93.
159. Stock, W.A., Winston, K.S., Behrens, J.T., Harper-Marinick, M., The effects of performance expectation and question difficulty on text study time, response certitude, and correct responding. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (1989), 567–569.
160. Sturges, P.T., Verbal retention as a function of the informativeness and delay of informative feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology 60 (1969), 11–14.
161. Sturges, P.T., Information delay and retention: Effect of information in feedback and tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1972), 32–43.
162. Sturges, P.T., Delay of informative feedback in computer-assisted testing. Journal of Educational Psychology 70 (1978), 378–387.
163. Sturges, P.T., Sarafino, E.P., Donaldson, P.L., Delay-retention effect and informative feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1968), 357–358.
164. Sullivan, H.J., Schutz, R.E., Baker, R.L., Effects of systematic variations in reinforcement contingencies on learner performance. American Educational Research Journal 8 (1971), 135–141.
165. Surber, J.R., Anderson, R.C., Delay-retention effect in natural classroom settings. Journal of Educational Psychology 67 (1975), 170–173.
166. Swindell, L.K., Walls, W.F., Response confidence and the delay retention effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology 18 (1993), 363–375.
167. Thorndike, E.L., Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. 1898, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
168. Thorndike, E.L., Animal intelligence. Experimental studies. 1911, Macmillan, Oxford, England.
169. Thorndike, E.L., Educational psychology. Vols 3, 1913, Teachers College, Columbia University, Oxford, England.
170. Thorndike, E.L., The fundamentals of learning. 1932, Teachers College Bureau of Publications, New York, NY.
171. Travers, R.M.W., Van Wagenen, R.K., Haygood, D.H., McCormick, M., Learning as a consequence of the learner's task involvement under different conditions of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology 55 (1964), 167–173.
172. Underwood, B.J., Freund, J.S., Effect of temporal separation of two tasks on proactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1968), 50–54.
173. Van Loon, M.H., Dunlosky, J., Van Gog, T., Van Merriënboer, J.J., De Bruin, A.B., Refutations in science texts lead to hypercorrection of misconceptions held with high confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 42 (2015), 39–48.
174. Wahlheim, C.N., Testing can counteract proactive interference by integrating competing information. Memory & Cognition 43:1 (2015), 27–38.
175. Wahlheim, C.N., Jacoby, L.L., Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition 41:1 (2013), 1–15.
176. Waldrop, P.B., Justen, J.E. III, Adams, T.M. II, A comparison of three types of feedback in a computer-assisted instruction task. Educational Technology 26 (1986), 43–45.
177. Webb, J.M., Pridemore, D.R., Stock, W.A., Kulhavy, R.W., Henning, J.E., Remembering responses and cognitive estimates of knowing: The effects of instructions, retrieval sequences, and feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 (1997), 147–164.
178. Webb, J.M., Stock, W.A., McCarthy, M.T., The effects of feedback timing on learning facts: The role of response confidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19 (1994), 251–265.
179. White, K., Delay of test information feedback and learning in a conventional classroom. Psychology in the Schools 5 (1968), 78–81.
180. Whyte, M.M., Karolick, D.M., Neilsen, M.C., Elder, G.D., Hawley, W.T., Cognitive styles and feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12 (1995), 195–203.
181. Williams, D.M., Bergström, Z., Grainger, C., Metacognitive monitoring and the hypercorrection effect in autism and the general population: Relation to autism (-like) traits and mindreading. Autism 22:3 (2018), 259–270.
182. Wilson, E.O., Consilience: The unity of knowledge. 1998, Knopf, New York.
183. Wright, J.H., Gescheider, G.A., Role of immediate and delayed knowledge of results in paired-associate learning under the anticipation procedure. Journal of Psychology 74 (1970), 249–257.