Summative and Formative Feedback

The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 52-78

  Brookhart, Susan M ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85072780758     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316832134.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26, 329-336.
2. Ames, C., and Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
3. Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 73, 87-95.
4. Andrade, H., and Brookhart, S. (2016). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. In press. Assessment in Education: Princples, Policy and Practice.
5. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment is for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved from www.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
7. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of pupil learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Boud, D., and Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 698-712.
9. Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R. (Eds). 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students’ formative and summative use of assessment information. Assessment in Education, 8, 153-169.
11. Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Brookhart, S. M. (2017). Formative assessment in teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin and J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. London: Sage.
13. Butler, R., and Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 210-216.
14. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
15. Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
16. Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning. New York: Routledge.
17. Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on pupils. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
19. Dann, R. (2016). Developing understanding of pupil feedback using Habermas’ notion of communicative action. Assessment in Education, 23, 396-414.
20. Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
21. Douglas, T., Salter, S., Iglesias, M., Dowlman, M., and Eri, R. (2016). The feedback process: Perceptions of first and second year undergraduate students in the disciplines of education, health science and nursing. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13(1), article 3.
22. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
23. Elton, L. (1982). Assessment for learning. In D. Bligh (Ed.), Professionalism and flexibility in learning (pp. 106-135). Guildford, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education.
24. Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70-120.
25. Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 51-62.
26. Gamlem, S. M., and Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20, 150-169.
27. Graham, S., Hebert, M., and Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 115, 523-547.
28. Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., and Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 107-133.
29. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
30. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
31. Heritage, M., and Heritage, J. (2013). Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 176-190.
32. Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., and Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31.
33. James, M., and Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. The Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 109-138.
34. Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
35. Kroog, H. I., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and Sands, D. (2014). Understanding the interplay between the cultural context of classrooms and formative assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia.
36. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
37. Lipnevich, A. A., and Smith, J. K. (2009a). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 319-333.
38. Lipnevich, A. A., and Smith, J. K. (2009b). “I really need feedback to learn”: Students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 347-367.
39. Mason, B. J., and Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.
40. Minstrell, J., Anderson, R., and Li, M. (2009). Assessing teacher competency in formative assessment. Annual Report to the National Science Foundation.
41. Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. Curriculum Journal, 25, 516-541.
42. Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Developing learners (8th edn.). Boston: Pearson.
43. Pajares, F., and Graham, L. (1998). Formalist thinking and language arts instruction: Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about truth and caring in the teaching conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 855-870.
44. Page, E. B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 173-181.
45. Peterson, E. R., and Irving, S. E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18, 238-250.
46. Pintrich, P. R., and Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk and J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Pokorny, H., and Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity, cues, and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 21-30.
48. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13.
49. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Using feedback to improve learning. London: Routledge.
50. Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
51. Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., and Deci, E. L. (1985). A motivational analysis of selfdetermination and self-regulation in the classroom. In C. Ames and R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education, vol. 2: The classroom milieu. New York: Academic Press.
52. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
53. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18, 42-50.
54. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647-658.
55. Schneider, M. C., and Gowan, P. (2013). Investigating teachers’ skills in interpreting evidence of student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 26, 191-204.
56. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
57. Shepard, L. A. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1066-1101). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
58. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.
59. Skinner, B. F. (1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969-977.
60. Stewart, L. G., and White, M. A. (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades, and student performance: What do we really know? Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 488-500.
61. Sztajn, P., Confrey, J., Wilson, P. H., and Edgington, C. (2012). Learning trajectory based instruction: Toward a theory of teaching. Educational Researcher, 41, 147-156.
62. Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational Psychology, vol. 1: The original nature of man. New York: Columbia University Teachers College.
63. Tunstall, P., and Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389-404.
64. Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., and Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85, 475-511.
65. Weaver, M. R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379-394.
66. Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
67. Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade and G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18-40). New York: Routledge.
68. Wylie, E. C., and Lyon, C. J. (2015). The fidelity of formative assessment implementation: Issues of breadth and quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 140-160.
69. Zhan, L. (2016). Written teacher feedback: Student perceptions, teacher perceptions, and actual teacher performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73-84.
70. Zimmerman, B., and Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performances. New York: Routledge.
71. Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., and Mewborn, C. (2016). Towards a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: A mixed methods study. Reading and Writing, 29, 349-370.