Rubric-based formative assessment in process eportfolio: Towards self-regulated learning

Digital Education Review

Volumn , Issue 35, 2019, Pages 18-35

  Tur, Gemma ^a   Urbina, Santos ^a   Forteza, Dolors ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Eportfolio; Formative assessment; Rubric; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85072344213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20139144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Abrami, P. C., Venkatesh, V., Meyer, E. J., & Wade, C. A. (2013). Using electronic portfolios to foster literacy and self-regulated learning skills in elementary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1188-1209. doi: 10.1037/a0032448
2. Aguaded, J.I., López Meneses, E., & Jaén, A. (2013). University e-Portfolios as a New Higher Education Teaching Method. The Development of a Multimedia Educational Material (MEM). Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC),10 (1), 188-209. doi: 0.7238/rusc.v10i1.1333
3. Alexiou, A. & Paraskeva, F. (2010). Enhancing self-regulated learning skills through the implementation of an eportfolio tool. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3048-3054. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.463
4. Alexiou, A. & Paraskeva, F. (2013, June 12-14). Exploiting motivation and self-efficacy through the implementation of self-regulated oriented ePortfolio. Paper presented at The International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, New York, USA. Retrieved from https://www.icelw.org/proceedings/2013/ICELW2013/papers/Alexiou_Paraskeva.pdf
5. Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon. L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36 (6), 671-687. doi: 10.1080/03075071003731135
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 1-13. Retrieved from https://rdc.udel.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/InsideBlackBox.pdf
7. Boer,A., Pijl, S.J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331-353. doi: 10.1080/13603110903030089
8. Cambridge, D. (2010). E-portfolios for lifelong learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, _36(4), 396-407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
10. Charteris, J., Quinn, F., Parkes, M., Fletcher, P., & Reyes, V. (2015). e-Assessment for Learning (eAfL) in higher education: is it a wolf in sheep’s clothing? Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 9. Retrieved from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/index.php?journal=jldhe&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=278
11. Cheng, G. & Chau, J. (2013). A study of the effects of goal orientation on the reflective ability of electronic portfolio users. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 51–56. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.003
12. Cukusic, M., Garaca, Z., & Jadric, M. (2014). Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 72, 100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.018
13. Dalmau, M., Guasch, D., Sala, I., Llinares,M., Dotras, P., Álvarez, H., & Giné. C. (2015). Diseño universal para la instrucción: indicadores para su implementación en el ámbito universitario. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/27277/diseno_universal_universidad.pdf?sequence= 2&isAllowed=y
14. De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2011). Assessing collaboration in a wiki: the reliability of university students’ peer assessment. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.003
15. Dee, T.S. (2015). Social Identity and Achievement Gaps: Evidence From an Affirmation Intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(2), 149-168. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2014.906009
16. Douglas, G., McLinden,M., Robertson, C.,Travers, J., & Smith, E. (2016).Including Pupils with Special Educational Needs and Disability in National Assessment: Comparison of Three Country Case Studies through an Inclusive Assessment Framework. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(1), 98-121. doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2015.1111306
17. Fraile, J., Pardo, R., & Panadero, E. (2017). ¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?. Revista Complutense de Educación, 28(4), 13-21. doi: 10.5209/RCED.51915
18. Galván-Fernández, C., Rubio-Hurtado, M., Martínez-Olmo, F., & Rodríguez-Illera, J. (2017). Can the integration of a PLE in an e-portfolio platform improve generic competences?. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 112-118. doi: 10.7821/naer.2017.7.230
19. Gámiz, V., Montes, R., & Pérez, M.C. (2014). Self-assessment via a blended-learning strategy to improve performance in an accounting subject. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 11(2), 41-54. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i2.2055
20. Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. doi: 10.1080/08923640701341653
21. Gielen, S. Dochy, F., & Onghena, P (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 137–155. doi: 10.1080/02602930903221444
22. Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N.E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literatura. Computers & Education, 57, 2333–2351. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.0 04
23. Gunawardena, C. N., Hermans, M. B., Sanchez, D., Richmond, C., Bohley, M., & Tuttle, R. (2009). A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools. Educational Media International, 46(1), 3-16. doi: 10.1080/09523980802588626
24. Hatzipanagos, S. & Warburton, S. (2009). Feedback as dialogue: exploring the links between formative assessment and social software in distance learning Learning, Media and Technology, _34(1), 45-59. doi: 10.1080/17439880902759919
25. Hemmings, B. Kemmis, S., & Reupert,A. (2013). Practice architectures of university inclusive education teaching in Australia. Professional Development: Education For All As Praxis, 39(4), 470-487. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2013.796293
26. Herro, D. (2014). Techno Savvy: a Web 2.0 curriculum encouraging critical thinking. Educational Media International, 51(4), 259-277. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2014.977069
27. Kabilan, M.A. & Khan, M.K. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using eportfolios: Benefits, challenges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58, 1007–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.011
28. Karsenti, T., Dumouchel, G., & Collin, S. (2014). The Eportfolio as Support for the Professional Development of Preservice Teachers: a Theoretical and Practical Overview. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 12(5), 3486-3495. Retrieved from http://cirworld.org/journals/index.php/ijct/article/view/671
29. Kivinen, O., Piiroinen, T., & Saikkonen, L. (2016). Two viewpoints on the challenges of ICT in education: knowledge-building theory vs. a pragmatist conception of learning in social action. Oxford Review of Education, 42(4), 377-390. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1194263
30. Lai, C. L. & Hwang, G.J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.011
31. Lim, C.P., Yan, H., & Xiong, X. (2015). Development of pre-service teachers’ information and communication technology (ICT) in education competencies in a mainland Chinese university. Educational Media International, 52(1), 15-32. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2015.1005425
32. Meyer, E., Abrami, P. C., Wade, C. A., Aslan, O., & Deault, L. (2010). Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL. Computers and Education, 55(1), 84-91. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.005
33. Moreno, L.L. & Rochera, M.J. (2016). Uses of ICT and Timing in Evaluative Practices of Teachers in Upper Secondary Education. Digital Education Review, DER, 30, 147-164. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/15235/pdf
34. Ng, E. M. W. & Lai, Y. C. (2012). An exploratory study on using wiki to foster student teachers’ learner-centered learning and self and peer assessment. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practices, 11, 71–84. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol11/JITEv11IIPp071-084NG1096.pdf
35. Nicol, D.J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
36. Nicol, D. J. & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan and K. Clegg (Eds), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education (pp.64-79). London: Taylor and Francis Group Ltd, London.
37. Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54, pp. 715–721. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.032
38. Panadero, E. & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
39. Panadero, E. & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(2), 450-462. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
40. Panke, S. (2014). E-Portfolios in Higher Education Settings: A Literature Review. E-Learn 2014-New Orleans, LA, United States, October 27-30. Retrieved from https://www.safetynetsolutions.com.au/uploads/2/6/0/6/26060087/eportfolios.pdf
41. Peacock, S., Murray, S., Scott, A. & Kelly, J. (2011). The Transformative Role of ePortfolios: Feedback in Healthcare Learning. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 33-48. Retrieved from http://www.theijep.com/pdf/ijep28.pdf
42. Penny, L. & Murphy, E. (2009). Rubrics for designing and evaluating online asynchronous discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 804–820. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00895.x.
43. Piedra, N., Chicaiza, López, J., Romero, A., & Tovar, E. (2010). Measuring collaboration and creativity skills through rubrics – experience from UTPL collaborative social networks course. In Paper presented at IEEE EDUCON education Engineering 2010 – The future of global learning engineering education. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492349.
44. Raposo, M.; Cebrián Robles, V. & Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2015). Erubric For The Assessment Of Skills And Content In The External Practices: Legal Aspects. ECER 2015. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3917.2320
45. Raposo, M. & Sarceda, M. C. (2010). El trabajo en las aulas con perspectiva europea: medios y recursos para el aprendizaje autónomo. Enseñanza & Teaching, 28(2), 45-60. Retrieved from http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/0212-5374/article/viewFile/7889/8359
46. Raposo-Riva, M. & Gallego-Arrufat, M.J. (2016). University students’ perceptions of electronic rubric-based assessment. Digital Education Review, DER, 30, pp. 220-233. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/15442/pdf_1
47. Rodríguez Illera, J.L., Galván, C., & Martínez Olmo, F. (2013). El portafolios digital como herramienta para el desarrollo de competencias transversales. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información (TESI), 14(2), 157-177. Retrieved from http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/10218/10627
48. Rosselló, M.R. & Pinya, C. (2017). Using blogs to improve professional competencies among undergraduate students. Digital Education Review, DER, 31, 20-38. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/15910/pdf
49. Sancho-Vinuesa, T. & Escudero, N. (2012). ¿Por qué una propuesta de evaluación formativa con feedback automático en una asignatura de matemáticas en línea? Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 9(2), 59-79. doi: 10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1285
50. Saul, C. & Wuttke, H.D. (2011). Feedback Personalization as Prerequisite for Assessing Higher-order Thinking Skills. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning. EURODL, 14(2). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=special&sp=articles&inum=3&article=445
51. Sellami, H.M (2015). What are Web 2.0 Competences and Why are They Important? – A Proposal to Enrich ePortfolio Standards. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning. EURODL, 18(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&sp=brief&year=2015&halfyear=1&article=688
52. Soomro, K.A., Kale, U., & Zai, S.Y. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ and teacher-educators’ experiences and attitudes toward using social networking sites for collaborative learning. Educational Media International, 51(4), 278-294. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2014.977003
53. Strudler, N. & Wetzel, K. (2011). Electronic Portfolios in Teacher Education: Forging a Middle Ground. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782584
54. Tan, V. & Kou, X. (2014). Case-based reasoning to help educators design with Web 2.0. Educational Media International, 51(2), 91-108. doi: 10.1080/09523987.2014.924662
55. Tierney, R. & Simon, M. (2004). What's still wrong with rubrics: focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(2), 1-10. Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=2
56. Topping, K. (2003). Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy and E. Cascallar (eds.), Optimising new models of assessment: in searThe role of eportfolios in supporting productive learning. (pp. 55-87). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
57. Tur, G. & Urbina, S. (2014) Blogs as Eportfolio Platforms in Teacher Education: Affordances and Limitations Derived from Student Teachers’ Perceptions and Performance on their Eportfolios. Digital Education Review, 26,1-23. Retrieved from http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/11578
58. Tur, G, Marín, V.I., Moreno, J., Gallardo, A., & Urbina, S. (2016). From Diagrams to Self-regulated Learning: Student Teachers’ Reflections on the Construction of their PLE. Educational Media International, 53(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1211335
59. Tur, G. & Urbina, s. (2016a). Rúbrica para la evaluación de portafolios electrónicos en el entorno de la web social. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 48, pp. 83-96. doi: 10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.06
60. Tur, G. & Urbina, S. (2016b). Collaboration in ePortfolios with Web 2.0 tools in initial teacher training/La colaboración en eportafolios con herramientas de la Web 2.0. en la formación docente inicial. Cultura y Educación, 28(3). doi: 10.1080/11356405.2016.1203528
61. Wang, C. (2009). Comprehensive assessment of student collaboration in electronic portfolio construction: an evaluation research. TechTrends, 53(1), 58-67. doi: 10.1007/s11528-009-0238
62. Wang, T.H. (2014). Developing an assessment-centered e-Learning system for improving student learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 74, 189–203. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.002
63. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning?. Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
64. Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016).The role of e-portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1276–1286. doi:10.1111/bjet.12316
65. Yastibas, A.E. & Yastibas, G.C. The Use of E-portfolio-based Assessment to Develop Students’ Self-regulated Learning in English Language Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.437