Uses of ICT and timing in evaluative practices of teachers in upper secondary education;Usos de las TIC y su temporalidad en prácticas evaluativas del profesorado de educación secundaria

Digital Education Review

Volumn , Issue 30, 2016, Pages 147-164

  Romero, Liliana Leticia Moreno ^a   Villach, María José Rochera ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Formative evaluation; Formative feedback; ICT; The timing of evaluation; Upper secondary education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007302206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20139144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Barberá, E. (2006). Aportaciones de la tecnología a la e-Evaluación. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia. Monograph 6, 1-13.
2. Badge, J. L., Cann, A. J., & Scott, J. (2007). To cheat or not to cheat? A trial of the JISC plagiarism detection service with biological sciences students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(4), 433-439.
3. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (2007). The impact of e-portfolios on learning eassessment and e-portfolios, UK, en: http://becta.org.uk/corporate/publications/documents/e-assessment.pdf (Consulta: 14 julio de 2014).
4. Boza, A., Tirado, R. & Guzmán, F., M. D. (2010). Creencias del profesorado sobre el significado de la tecnología en la enseñanza: influencia para su inserción en los centros docentes andaluces. Relieve, 16(1), 1-24.
5. Brown, G. (2009). Teachers' self-reported assessment practices and conceptions: Using structural equation modelling to examine measurement and structural models. In T. Teo & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Structural equation modelling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 243-266). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
6. Brown, G. T., & Remesal, A. (2012). Prospective teachers' conceptions of assessment: A cross-cultural comparison. The Spanish journal of psychology, 15(01), 75-89.
7. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J. (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in higher Education, 36, 395-407.
8. Coll, C., Barberà, E., & Onrubia, J. (2000). La atención a la diversidad en las prácticas de evaluación. Infancia y aprendizaje, 23(90), 111-132.
9. Coll, C., Mauri, T., & Rochera, M. J. (2012). La práctica de evaluación como contexto para el aprendizaje competente. Profesorado, 16, 49-59.
10. Coll, C. & Remesal, A. (2009). Concepciones del profesorado de matemáticas acerca de las funciones de la evaluación del aprendizaje en la educación obligatoria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32(3), 391-404.
11. Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., De Gispert, I., & Barriga, F. D. (2013). Distribution of feedback among teacher and students in online collaborative learning in small groups. Digital Education Review, (23), 27-45.
12. Colomina, R., & Rochera, M. J. (2002). Evaluar para ajustar la ayuda educativa. Cuadernos de pedagogía, (318), 56-62.
13. Davies, Sarah (2010). Effective Assessment in a Digital Age A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback, Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC), UK, en: http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614115719/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/d ocuments/programmes/elearning/digiassass-eada.pdf (consulta: 23 de febrero de 2014).
14. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353-371.
15. Elwood, J. (2006). Formative assessment: possibilities, boundaries and limitations, Assessment in Education. Principles: Policy & Practice, 13(2), 215-232.
16. Erickson, F. (1989). Métodos cualitativos de investigación sobre la enseñanza. En M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), La investigación de la enseñanza, II. Métodos cualitativos y de observación (pp. 195-301). Barcelona: Paidós.
17. Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
18. García, A. M. D., & Cuello, R. O. (2009). Interacción entre la evaluación continua y la autoevaluación formativa: La potenciación del aprendizaje autónomo. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, (4), 8.
19. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D. & Davis, N. E (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333-2351.
20. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Meaning of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
21. Huang, K., Chen, C. H., Wu, W. S., & Chen, W. Y. (2015). Interactivity of Question Prompts and Feedback on Secondary Students' Science Knowledge Acquisition and Cognitive Load. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 159-171.
22. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) (2014). e - Assessment and Feedback for Effective Course Transformation (e-AFFECT), en: http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/file/84781771/AF%20Institutional%20Story% 20%202014%20final.docx (consulta: 4 de mayo de 2014).
23. Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37.
24. Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. D. (2012). Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers' initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(5), 523-539.
25. Li, J., & De Luca, R. (2014). Review of assessment feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 378-393.
26. Mauri, T. & Rochera, M. J. (2010). La evaluación de los aprendizajes en la Educación Secundaria. En Coll, C. (Coord.) Desarrollo, aprendizaje y enseñanza en la educación secundaria (pp. 155-167). Barcelona: Graó/Madrid: MEC
27. Moreno, L. L., & Rochera, M. J. (2015). Congruencias y discrepancias entre concepciones y prácticas evaluativas con uso de TIC. Perspectiva Educacional, 54(2), 126-149.
28. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd ed., pp. 125-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 87-502.
29. Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
30. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.
31. Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2010). Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning - a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 125-135.
32. Redecker, C. & Johannseen, Ø. (2013). Changing Assessment-Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-92.
33. Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 472-482.
34. Rochera, M. J. & Naranjo, M. (2007). Ayudar a autorregular el aprendizaje en una situación de evaluación. Electronic Journal of research in Educational Psychology, 5(13), 805-824.
35. Shirley, M. L., & Irving, K. E. (2015). Connected Classroom Technology Facilitates Multiple Components of Formative Assessment Practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 56-68.
36. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.
37. Stake, R. E. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid, España: Morata.
38. Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172-92.
39. Tsai, F. H., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, K. Y. (2015). The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback types on game-based formative assessment in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 81, 259-269.
40. Yin, R. K. (2006). Case Study Methods. En J. L Green, G. Camilli & P. B Elmore (Eds.) Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research (pp. 111-122). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.