Case-based reasoning to help educators design with Web 2.0

Educational Media International

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 91-108

  Tan, Verily ^a   Kou, Xiaojing ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

case based reasoning; instructional design; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903551481     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2014.924662     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baumann, J. F. (1996). Conflict or compatibility in classroom inquiry? One teacher's struggle to balance teaching and research. Educational Researcher, 25, 29-36.
2. Bower, M., Hedberg, J. G., & Kuswara, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47, 177-198.10.1080/09523987.2010.518811
3. Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
4. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13.
5. Dede, C. (2008). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE review, 43, 80-81.
6. Efimova, L. (2004). Discovering the iceberg of knowledge work: A weblog case. Proceedings from the Fifth European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities. Innsbruck, Austria.
7. Hannafin, M. J., & Kim, M. C. (2003). In search of a future: A critical analysis of research on web-based teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 31, 347-351.10.1023/A:1024646328974
8. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47-64.
9. Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 65-77.10.1007/BF02504994
10. Jonassen, D. H., Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Choi, I. (2002). Integrating constructivism and learning technologies. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology understanding complexity (pp. 103-128). Netherlands: Springer.
11. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. J. (2007). Web-enhanced case-based activity in teacher education: A case study. Instructional Science, 37, 151-170.
12. Kim, H., & Hannafin, M. (2008). Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 161-179.10.1007/s11423-006-9010-9
13. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., & Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 829-861). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
16. Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S., Agostinho, S., & Hedberg, J. (2007). Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 829-861). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
17. Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its consructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-150). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
18. Schank, R. C. (1999). Dynamic memory revisited (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527920
19. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Zeni, J. (2006). A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educational Action Research, 6, 9-19.