Interactionist approach

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 7-23

  Gass, Susan M ^a   Mackey, Alison ^b   Abbuhl, Rebekha ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064366379     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (146)

1. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 183—210.
2. Ammar, A. and Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543—574.
3. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé composé and imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 226—243.
4. Bigelow, M., Delmas, R., Hansen, K., and Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 665-689.
5. Bowles, M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge.
6. Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds.), Task-based learning: Language teaching, learning and assessment(pp. 23-48). London: Longman.
7. Bygate, M. (2009). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, and J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 249-274). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Bygate, M. and Samuda, V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose, and engagement within the interaction approach. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 93-116). New York: Routledge.
9. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., and Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow, England: Longman.
10. Carpenter, H., Jeon, K.S., MacGregor, D., and Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in second language acquisition, 28, 209-236.
11. Carroll, S. and Swain, S. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: an empirical study ofthe learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in second language acquisition, 15, 357-386.
12. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variability. Studies in second language acquisition, 11, 367-383.
13. Crookes, G. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: A socioeducational perspective. Studies in second language acquisition, 20, 93-116.
14. de la fuente, M. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: the roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in second language acquisition, 24, 81-112.
15. Doughty, C. and Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: an aid to acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
16. Doughty, C. and Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
18. Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511-537.
19. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33, 209-224.
22. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339-360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221-246.
24. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., and Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
25. Ellis, R. and Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
26. Ferguson, C. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 117-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
28. Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: A consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 75-97). Harlow: Longman.
29. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299—323.
30. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of planning andfocus of planning on task-basedperformance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 215—247.
31. Foster, P. and Skehan, P. (2009). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, and J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 275—300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Garcia, M.F. (2007). Tasks, negotiation, and L2 learning in a foreign language context. In M. Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks informal language learning (pp. 69—90). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
33. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2007a). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175—200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Gass, S. and Mackey, A. (2007b). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Gass, S., Mackey, A., and Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning (The best of Language Learning Series), 61, 189—220.
37. Gass, S. and Alvarez Torres, M. (2005). Attention when? An investigation ofthe ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 1—31.
38. Gass, S. and Varonis, E. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37—58.
39. Gass, S. and Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in nonnative speaker—nonnative speaker interaction. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327—351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
40. Hatch, E. (1978b). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401—435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
41. Hatch, E. (1987a). Acquisition of syntax in a second language. In J. Richards (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches (pp. 34—70). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
42. Havranek, G. (2002). When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 225—270.
43. Havranek, G. and Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 99—122.
44. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition ofthe aspectual form of—te i (ru) by learners of japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311—394.
45. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive feedback in task-based interaction: Differential effects of L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1—36.
46. Jeon, K. (2007). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversation interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 379—403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., and Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In J. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91—131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Kim, J.-H. and Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap?. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 269—297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues relating to the monitor model. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, and R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ’77 (pp. 144-158). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
50. Krashen, S. (1980). The input hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 168-180). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
51. Language Teaching Review Panel. (2008). Replication studies in language learning and teaching: Questions and answers. Language Teaching, 41, 1-14.
52. Lai, C. and Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing in text-based online chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 102-120.
53. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
54. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365.
55. Loewen, S. (2009). Recasts in multiple response focus on form episodes. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 176-196). New York: Routledge.
56. Loewen, S. and Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1-14.
57. Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., and Ahn, S. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91-104.
58. Loewen, S. and Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies(pp. 361-377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Long, M. (1980). Input and interaction in second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles.
60. Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and Foreign language acquisition: Annals of the New York Academy of Science (Vol. 379, 259-278).
61. Long, M. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
62. Long, M. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Clarke and J. Handscombe (Eds.), Pacific perspective on language learning and teaching (pp. 207-225). Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
63. Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interaction. University of Hawaii Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 8, 1-26.
64. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, and C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
65. Long, M. (1996). The role ofthe linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Long, M. (1998). SLA: Breaking the siege. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 17, 79-129.
67. Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert and E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
68. Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
69. Long, M., Inagaki, S., and Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in japanese and spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
70. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and secondlanguage acquisition: What is the relationship?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-323.
71. Lyster, R. (1998a). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
72. Lyster, R. (1998b). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-92.
73. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
74. Lyster, R. and Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59, 453-498.
75. Lyster, R. and Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 27-66.
76. Lyster, R. and Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
77. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
78. Mackey, A. (2006a). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics,27, 405-430.
79. Mackey, A. (2006b). From introspections, brain scans, and memory tests to the role of social context: Advancing research on interaction and learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 369-379.
80. Mackey, A. (2007). Introduction: The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 1—26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. Mackey, A. and Abbuhl, R. (2006). Input and interaction. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, andpractice (pp. 207—233). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
82. Mackey, A., Al-Khalil, M., Atanassova, G., Hama, M., Logan-Terry, A., and Nakatsukasa, K. (2007). Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 129—152.
83. Mackey, A. and Gass, S. (2006). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
84. Mackey, A., Gass, S., and McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471—497.
85. Mackey, A. and Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies(pp. 407-452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Mackey, A. and Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.
87. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., and Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation offeedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
88. Mackey, A. and Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
89. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., and Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
90. Mackey, A. and Polio, C. (2009). Introduction. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 1-10). New York: Routledge.
91. Mackey, A. and Silver, R. (2005). Interactional tasks and english L2 learning by immigrant children in singapore. System, 33, 239-260.
92. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
93. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simplepast activityverbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies(pp. 323-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
95. Nabei, I. and Swain, M. (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student’s second language learning. Language Awareness,11, 43-63.
96. Nassaji, H. (2009).Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role offeedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59, 411-452.
97. Norris, J. M. and Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J.M. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
98. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
99. Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 97-111.
100. Oliver, R. (2009). How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and feedback in children aged five to seven years. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multipleperspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 135-156). New York: Routledge.
101. Ortega, L. (2009). Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 226-253). New York: Routledge.
102. Panova, L. and Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 573-595.
103. Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 160-166.
104. Petersen, K. and Mackey, A. (2009). Interaction, Modality and Learning: Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Generated and Face to Face Recasts. Paper presented at SLRF, October, Michigan State University.
105. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Non-native speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
106. Philp, J. and Mackey, A. (in press). Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive aspects of second language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
107. Pica, T. and Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233-248.
108. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., and Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
109. Pica, T., Young, R., and Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
110. Plough, I. and Gass, S. (1993). Interlocutor and task familiarity: Effects on interactional structure. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 35-55). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
111. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
112. Russell, J. and Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
113. Sachs, R. and Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses oftwo types of written feedback on a L2 revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100.
114. Sachs, R. and Suh, B.-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 199-227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 229-248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
116. Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
117. Sato, M. and Lyster, R. (2007). Modified output of japanese EFL learners: Variable effects of interlocutor vs. Feedback types. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 123-142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology, 13, 96-120.
119. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness is second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
120. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
121. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.
122. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of english articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
123. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
124. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-211.
125. Skehan, P. and Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
126. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
127. Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 33-58.
128. Spada, N. and Lightbown, P. (2009). Interaction research in second/foreign language classrooms. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 157-175). New York: Routledge.
129. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Inputinsecond language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
130. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of henry G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
131. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
132. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent french immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
133. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two french immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Education Research, 37, 285-304.
134. Tarone, E. (2009). A variationist perspective on the interaction approach. In A. Mackey and C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 41-57). New York: Routledge.
135. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., and Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 171-195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
136. Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation of language learners’ output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
137. VanPatten, B. (1989). Can learners attend to form and content while processing input?. Hispania, 72, 409-417.
138. Varonis, E. and Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics,6, 71-90.
139. Wagner-Gough, J. and Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input data in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning, 25, 297-307.
140. Watanabe, Y. and Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121-142.
141. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
142. Yuan, F. and Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics,24, 1-27.
143. White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
144. Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
145. Yule, G. andMacdonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflict in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539-556.
146. Yule, G., Powers, M., and Macdonald, D. (1992). The variable effects of some task-based learning procedures on L2 communicative effectiveness. Language Learning, 42, 249-277.