Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms

Language Learning

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 617-673

  Muranoi, Hitoshi ^a  

^a TOHOKU GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034365340     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00142     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
2. Beck, M., & Eubank, L. (1991). Acquisition theory and experimental design: A critique of Tomasello and Herron. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 73-76.
3. Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
5. Chaudron, C. & Parker, K. (199 Discourse markedness and structural markedness The acquisition of English noun phrases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 43-64.
6. Cheng, P. (1985). Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review, 92, 412-423.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8. DeKeyser, R. (1995). Learning L2 grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
9. DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Di Pietro, R. (1987). Strategic interaction: Learning languages through scenarios. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
12. Doughty, C. (1994). Fine-tuning of feedback by competent speakers to language learners. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1993 (pp. 96-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
13. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Ellis, N. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.
16. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The role of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285-301.
18. Farrar, M. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28, 90-98.
19. Fujimura, T., Kato, Y., Ahmed, M., & Leong, M. (Eds.). (1996). Proceedings of the 7th conference on second language research in Japan. Yamato-machi, Niigata: Language Program, International University of Japan.
20. Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
21. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Green, P., & Hecht, K. (1992). Implicit and explicit grammar: An empirical study. Applied Linguistics, 13, 168-184.
23. Hulstijn, J. (1995). Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention & awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 359-386). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press.
24. Johnson, K. (1996). Language teaching & skill learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). Stage/structure versus phase/process in modeling linguistic and cognitive development. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Reopening the debate (pp. 164-190). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
28. Krashen, S. (1984). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.
29. Krashen, S. (1992). Formal grammar instruction: An educator comments. . . . TESOL Quarterly, 26, 409-411.
30. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
31. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
33. Long, M., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
34. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes and S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
36. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 50-81.
37. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
38. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
39. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
40. Master, P. (1990). Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461-478.
41. Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher & G. Brain (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 183-204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
43. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.
44. Muranoi, H. (1996). Effects of interaction enhancement on restructuring of interlanguage grammar: A cognitive approach to foreign language instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
45. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form: Implicit and explicit form-focused instruction incorporated into a communicative task. Manuscript in preparation.
46. Nelson, K. (1987). Some observations from the perspective of the rare event cognitive comparison theory of language acquisition. In K. Nelson & A. Kleeck (Eds.), Children's language (Vol. 6, pp. 289-331). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47. Pica, T. (1984). Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69-78.
48. Pica, T. (1985). Instruction on second-language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 6, 214-222.
49. Pica, T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker-non-native speaker negotiation: What do they reveal about second language learning? In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198-237). Cambridge, MA: Heath.
50. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, M. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
51. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-67.
52. Rosa, E., & O'Neil, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
53. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
54. Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-180.
55. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
56. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Sorace, A. (1985). Metalinguistic knowledge and language use in acquisition-poor environments. Applied Linguistics, 6, 239-254.
58. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
59. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
60. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
63. Takashima, H. (1995). A study of focused feedback, or output enhancement, in promoting accuracy in communicative activities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.
64. Tarone, E., & Parrish, B. (1988). Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language Learning, 38, 21-44.
65. Terrell, T. (1991). The role of grammar instruction in a communicative approach. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 52-63.
66. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385-395.
67. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
68. Zobl, H. (1983). Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning, 33, 292-313.