Students’ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction

Computers and Education

Volumn 126, Issue , 2018, Pages 75-88

  Zainuddin, Zamzami ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Flipped classroom; Gamification; Gamified flipped classroom; Learning performance; Perceived motivation; Self determination theory

Indexed keywords

MOTIVATION; SURVEYS;

DATA COLLECTION PROCESS; FLIPPED CLASSROOMS; GAMIFICATION; LEARNING PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION AND ENGAGEMENTS; QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS; RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORIES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85049477058     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. de Marcos, L., Garcia Lopez, E., Garcia Cabot, A., On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers & Education 95 (2016), 99–113.
2. Abeysekera, L., Dawson, P., Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development 34:1 (2015), 1–14.
3. Aldemir, T., Celik, B., Kaplan, G., A qualitative investigation of student perceptions of game elements in a gamified course. Computers in Human Behavior 78 (2018), 235–254.
4. de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., Birisci, S., Mathematics teachers’ motivations for, conceptions of, and experiences with flipped instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education 62 (2017), 60–70.
5. Baepler, P., Walker, J.D., Driessen, M., It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 227–236.
6. Baxter, R.J., Holderness, D.K. Jr., Wood, D.A., Applying basic gamification techniques to IT compliance training: Evidence from the lab and field. Journal of Information Systems 30:3 (2015), 119–133.
7. Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A., The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA, 2013, June (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1–18).
8. Blau, I., Peled, Y., Nusan, A., Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge in one-to-one classroom: Teachers developing “digital wisdom”. Interactive Learning Environments 24:6 (2016), 1215–1230.
9. Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education 115 (2017), 69–81.
10. Boevé A.J., Meijer, R.R., Bosker, R.J., Vugteveen, J., Hoekstra, R., Albers, C.J., Implementing the flipped classroom: An exploration of study behaviour and student performance. Higher Education 74:6 (2017), 1015–1032.
11. Brunsell, E., Horejsi, M., Science 2.0: A flipped classroom in action. The Science Teacher, 80(2), 2013, 8.
12. Brunsell, E., Horejsi, M., Science 2.0: Designing your course like a video game. The Science Teacher, 80(7), 2013, 8.
13. Buckley, P., Doyle, E., Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers & Education 106 (2017), 43–55.
14. Çakıroğlu, Ü., Öztürk, M., Flipped classroom with problem based activities: Exploring self-regulated learning in a programming language course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20:1 (2017), 337–349.
15. Chang, J.W., Wei, H.Y., Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19:2 (2016), 177–203.
16. Chen, K.C., Jang, S.J., Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior 26:4 (2010), 741–752.
17. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, N.S., Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education 79 (2014), 16–27.
18. Clark, K.R., The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online 12:1 (2015), 91–115.
19. Creswell, J.W., Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2013, Sage publications.
20. Davis, L.L., Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research 5 (1992), 194–197.
21. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Handbook of self-determination research. 2002, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY.
22. Ding, L., Kim, C., Orey, M., Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education 115 (2017), 126–142.
23. Eid, M.I., Al-Jabri, I.M., Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education 99 (2016), 14–27.
24. El Banna, M.M., Whitlow, M., McNelis, A.M., Flipping around the classroom: Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing students’ satisfaction and achievement. Nurse Education Today 56 (2017), 41–46.
25. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W., Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior 29:1 (2013), 285–292.
26. Hanus, M.D., Fox, J., Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education 80 (2015), 152–161.
27. Hung, H.T., Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28:1 (2015), 81–96.
28. Keengwe, J., Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. 2014, IGI Global.
29. Kim, K., Ahn, S.J.G., The role of gamification in enhancing intrinsic motivation to use a loyalty program. Journal of Interactive Marketing 40 (2017), 41–51.
30. Kim, M.K., Kim, S.M., Khera, O., Getman, J., The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education 22 (2014), 37–50.
31. Klassen, A.C., Creswell, J., Clark, V.L.P., Smith, K.C., Meissner, H.I., Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research 21:3 (2012), 377–380.
32. Kong, S.C., Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 160–173.
33. Kong, S.C., Song, Y., An experience of personalized learning hub initiative embedding BYOD for reflective engagement in higher education. Computers & Education 88 (2015), 227–240.
34. Kuo, M.S., Chuang, T.Y., How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination–An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior 55 (2016), 16–27.
35. Lee, Y., Lee, J., Hwang, Y., Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 51 (2015), 418–428.
36. Leung, L.S.K., Matanda, M.J., The impact of basic human needs on the use of retailing self-service technologies: A study of self-determination theory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 20:6 (2013), 549–559.
37. Long, T., Cummins, J., Waugh, M., Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 29:2 (2017), 179–200.
38. Lynn, M.R., Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research 35 (1986), 382–385.
39. Maican, C., Lixandroiu, R., Constantin, C., Interactivia. ro–A study of a gamification framework using zero-cost tools. Computers in Human Behavior 61 (2016), 186–197.
40. Marchalot, A., Dureuil, B., Veber, B., Fellahi, J.L., Hanouz, J.L., Dupont, H., et al. Effectiveness of a blended learning course and flipped classroom in first year anaesthesia training. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2017, 1–5 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2017.10.008.
41. Mekler, E.D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A.N., Opwis, K., Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 525–534.
42. Merriam, S., What Can You Tell from an N ofl?: Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 4 (1995), 50–60.
43. Millard, E., 5 reasons flipped classrooms work. 2012, University Business.
44. O'Flaherty, J., Phillips, C., The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education 25 (2015), 85–95.
45. Olakanmi, E.E., The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:1 (2017), 127–137.
46. Peled, Y., Blau, I., Grinberg, R., Does 1: 1 computing in a junior high-school change the pedagogical perspectives of teachers and their educational discourse. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning-IJELL 11 (2015), 257–271.
47. Ryan, S., Language learning motivation within the context of globalisation: An L2 self within an imagined global community. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies: International Journal 3:1 (2006), 23–45.
48. Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K., Mandl, H., How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 69 (2017), 371–380.
49. Sams, A., Bergmann, J., Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership 70 (2013), 16–20.
50. Schmidt, S.M., Ralph, D.L., The flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. The clute Institute International Academic conference, san Antonio, Texas, USA 2014, 2014.
51. Sergis, S., Sampson, D.G., Pelliccione, L., Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students’ learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior 78 (2018), 368–378.
52. Sohrabi, B., Iraj, H., Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016), 514–524.
53. Sørebø Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V.F., Kristiansen, R., The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education 53:4 (2009), 1177–1187.
54. Talbert, R., Inverting the transition-to-proof classroom. Primus 25:8 (2015), 614–626.
55. Thai, N.T.T., De Wever, B., Valcke, M., The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education 107 (2017), 113–126.
56. Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E., Hall, W., An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior 73 (2017), 527–540.
57. Tse, W.S., Choi, L.Y., Tang, W.S., Effects of video-based flipped class instruction on subject reading motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2017, 1–14 http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12569.
58. Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C., Smart education and smart e-learning, 41, 2015, Springer.
59. Wang, F.H., An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education 114 (2017), 79–91.
60. Yang, Y., Asaad, Y., Dwivedi, Y., Examining the impact of gamification on intention of engagement and brand attitude in the marketing context. Computers in Human Behavior 73 (2017), 459–469.
61. Zainuddin, Z., Halili, S.H., Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 17:3 (2016), 313–340.
62. Zainuddin, Z., Perera, C.J., Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2017, 1–12.