Applying basic gamification techniques to it compliance training: Evidence from the lab and field

Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 119-133

  Baxter, Ryan J ^a   Holderness, D Kip ^b   Wood, David A ^c  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compliance training; Data privacy; Gamification; Information security

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991109367     PISSN: 08887985     EISSN: 15587959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/isys-51341     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011a. Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 4-12.
2. Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011b. A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education 33 (1): 51-71.
3. Ainley, M., and S. Hidi. 2014. Interest and enjoyment. In International Handbook of Emotions in Education, 205-227. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Anderson, J. R. 2005. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York, NY: Worth.
5. Barata, G., S. Gama, J. Jorge, and D. Gonçalves. 2014. Relating Gaming Habits with Student Performance in a Gamified Learning Experience. Proceeding of CHI PLAY 2014, Toronto, ON, Canada, October 19-22.
6. Berlyne, D. E. 1970. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics 8 (5): 279-286.
7. Breuer, J. S., and G. Bente. 2010. Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture 4 (1): 7-24.
8. Chambers, J., and J. Stewart. 2015. Why Cybersecurity Leadership Must Start at the Top. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/frontline/2015/07/13/why-cybersecurity-leadership-must-start-at-the-top/
9. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2013. Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Available at: http://www.coso.org/IC.htm
10. Cone, B. D., C. E. Irvine, M. F. Thompson, and T. D. Nguyen. 2007. A video game for cyber security training and awareness. Computers & Security 26 (1): 63-72.
11. Connolly, T. M., E. A. Boyle, E. MacArthur, T. Hainey, and J. M. Boyle. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education 59 (2): 661-686.
12. Daubenfeld, T., and D. Zenker. 2014. A Game-Based Approach to an Entire Physical Chemistry Course. Available at: http://www.pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed5001697
13. Deterding, S., D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. E. Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification.” Presented at the 2011 MindTrek Conference, Tampere, Finland, September 28-30.
14. Devers, C. J., and R. A. Gurung. 2015. Critical perspective on gamification in education. In Gamification in Education and Business, 417-430. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
15. Domińguez, A., J. Sáenz-de-Navarrete, L. De-Marcos, L. Fernańdez-Sanz, C. Pagés, and J.-J. Martińez-Herráiz. 2013. Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education 63: 380-392.
16. Donovan, L. 2012. The UseofSerious Games in the Corporate Sector: A Stateofthe Art Report. Available at: http://www.learnovatecentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Use_of_Serious_Games_in_the_Corporate_Sector_PRINT_FINAL.pdf
17. Downes-Le Guin, T., R. Baker, J. Mechling, and E. Ruylea. 2012. Myths and realities of respondent engagement in online surveys. International JournalofMarket Research 54 (5): 613-633.
18. Entertainment Software Association (ESA). 2014. 2014 Sales, Demographic, and Usage Data. Essential Facts about the Computer and Video Game Industry. Available at: http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ESA_EF_2014.pdf
19. Gardiner, B. 2014. Gamification the New Game Changer? How Enterprise Gamification Is Enhancing Innovation, Change Management and Collaboration. Available at: http://www.cio.com.au/article/539654/gamification_new_game_changer_/
20. Gelinas, U., R. Dull, and P. Wheeler. 2011. Accounting Information Systems. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
21. Groenfeldt, T. 2014. NYSE Acquires True Office, Developer of Interactive Game-Style Training. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomgroenfeldt/2014/11/19/nyse-acquires-true-office-developer-of-interactive-game-style-training/
22. Halter, E. 2006. From Sun Tzu to Xbox: War and Video Games. New York, NY: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
23. Hamari, J., J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa. 2014. Does Gamification Work?—A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber1/46758978
24. Karjalainen, M., and M. Siponen. 2011. Toward a new meta-theory for designing information systems (IS) security training approaches. Journalofthe Association for Information Systems 12 (8): 518-555.
25. Klamm, B. K., and M. W. Watson. 2009. SOX 404 reported internal control weaknesses: A test of COSO framework components and information technology. Journal of Information Systems 23 (2): 1-23.
26. Koivisto, J., and J. Hamari. 2014. Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior 35: 179-188.
27. Li, W., T. Grossman, and G. Fitzmaurice. 2014. CADament: A gamified multiplayer software tutorial system. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available at: https://d2f99xq7vri1nk.cloudfront.net/legacy_app_files/pdf/cadament.pdf
28. Mayo, M. J. 2007. Games for science and engineering education. Communications of the ACM 50 (7): 30-35.
29. McCallion, J. 2013. Thomson Reuters and True Office to Gamify Financial Services. Available at: http://www.itpro.co.uk/645580/thomson-reuters-and-true-office-set-out-to-gamify-financial-services#ixzz3eZmJAVNG
30. Miller, D. J., and D. P. Robertson. 2011. Educational benefits of using game consoles in a primary classroom: A randomized controlled trial. British JournalofEducational Technology 42 (5): 850-864.
31. Mollick, E. R., and N. Rothbard. 2014. Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract1/42277103
32. Nagarajan, A., J. M. Allbeck, A. Sood, and T. L. Janssen. 2012. Exploring Game Design for Cybersecurity Training. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=6392562&filter%3DAND%28p_IS_Number%3A6350542%29%26pageNumber%3D2
33. Nicholson, S. 2014. A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In Gamification in Education and Business, edited by Wood, L., and T. Reiners. New York, NY: Springer.
34. Novak, E. 2014. Toward a mathematical model of motivation, volition, and performance. Computers & Education 74: 73-80.
35. Pekrun, R., and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2012. Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, edited by Christenson, N. S. L., A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie, 259-282. New York, NY: Springer.
36. Pekrun, R., T. Goetz, W. Titz, and R. P. Perry. 2002. Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37: 91-105.
37. Pekrun, R., T. Goetz, A. Frenzel, P. Barchfeld, and R. P. Perry. 2011. Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology 36: 36-48.
38. Quaranta, S. 2013. Compliance Training: Make It Relevant to Employees’ Jobs. Available at: http://www.executiveboard.com/blogs/compliance-training-make-it-relevant-to-employees-jobs/
39. Rantos, K., K. Fysarakis, and C. Manifavas. 2012. How effective is your security awareness program? An evaluation methodology. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective 21 (6): 328-345.
40. Reeves, B., and J. L. Read. 2009. Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
41. Ritterfield, U., M. Cody, and P. Vorderer. 2009. Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. London, U.K.: Routledge.
42. Romney, M., and P. Steinbart. 2015. Accounting Information Systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Squire, K. 2003. Video games in education. International Journal Intelligent Games and Simulation 2 (1): 49-62.
44. Susi, T., M. Johanesson, and P. Backlund. 2007. Serious Games—An Overview. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:2416/FULLTEXT01.pdf
45. Tomkins, S. S. 1962. Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: Vol. I. The Positive Affects. New York, NY: Springer.
46. Totty, M. 2005. Business Solutions: Better Training through Gaming. Available at: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111401010367812026
47. Tulving, E., and N. Kroll. 1995. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2 (3): 387-390.
48. van der Heijden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 (4): 695-704.
49. van Kesteren, M. T., D. J. Ruiter, G. Fernańdez, and R. N. Henson. 2012. How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends inNeurosciences 35 (4): 211-219.
50. Virvou, M., G. Katsionis, and K. Manos. 2005. Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. JournalofEducational Technology and Society 8 (2): 54-65.
51. Wouters, P., C. van Nimwegen, H. van Oostendorp, and E. D. van der Spek. 2013. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (2): 249-265.