Best practices in mixed methods for quality of life research

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 377-380

  Klassen, Ann C ^a   Creswell, John ^b   Plano Clark, Vicki L ^b   Smith, Katherine Clegg ^c   Meissner, Helen I ^d  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d Institutes of Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH;

BENCHMARKING; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84863632438     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0122-x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U. S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428-440.
2. Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442-1452.
3. Almarsdottir, A. B., & Traulsen, N. M. (2009). Multimethod research into policy changes in the pharmacy sector-the Nordic case. Research Social Administrative Pharmacy, 5(1), 82-90.
4. Stange, K. C., Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292-294. (Pubitemid 44198455)
5. Wilkins, K., & Woodgate, R. (2008). Designing a mixed methods study in pediatric oncology nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 25(1), 24-33.
6. Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612-621.
7. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Chamberlain, P., Hurlburt, M. S., & Landsverk, J. (2011). Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: A review. Psychiatric Services, 62(3), 255-263.
8. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Klassen, A. C., Smith, K. C., Black, M. M., & Caulfield, L. E. (2009). Mixed method approaches to understanding cancer-related dietary risk reduction among public housing residents. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(4), 624-640.
10. McVea, K., Crabtree, B. F., Medder, J. D., Susman, J. L., Lukas, L., McIlvain, H. E., et al. (1996). An ounce of prevention? Evaluation of the 'put prevention into practice' program. Journal of Family Practice, 43(4), 73-81.
11. Pasick, R. J., Burke, N. J., Barker, J. C., Galen, J., Bird, J. A., Otero-Sabogal, R., et al. (2009). Behavioral theory in a diverse society: Like a compass on Mars. Health Education Behavior, 36(5), 11S-35S.
12. Ring, L., Gross, C. R., & McColl, E. (2010). Putting the text back into context: Toward increased use of mixed methods for quality of life research. Quality of Life Research, 19, 613-615.
13. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.
14. Morse, J., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.