Did we forget someone? Students’ computer access and literacy for CALL

CALICO Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 482-509

  Winke, Paula ^a   Goertler, Senta ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Basic Language Program; CALL; Computer Access; Computer Literacy; Student Perceptions of CALL

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044993234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v25i3.482-509     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Abrams, Z. I. (2002). Surfing to cross-cultural awareness: Using internet-mediated projects to explore cultural stereotypes. Foreign Language Annals, 35(2), 141-160.
2. Al-Hamly, M. A. (2003). A study of the effectiveness of Arabic CALL: The learner’s views. Arab Journal for the Humanities, 21(2), 227-246.
3. Amiri, F. (2000). IT-literacy for language teachers: Should it include computer programming? System, 28(1), 77-84.
4. Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 (3), 241-249.
5. Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
6. Barile, A. L., & Durso, F. T. (2002). Computer-mediated communication in collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(2), 173-190.
7. Barone, C. A., & Hagner, P. R. (Eds.). (2001). Technology enhanced teaching and learning: Leading and supporting the transformation on your campus. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Barr, D. (2004). Students and ICT: An analysis of student reaction to the use of computer technology in language learning. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 36(2), 19-38.
9. Barrette, C. M. (2001). Students’ preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19(1), 5-36. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
10. Bax, S. (2003). CALL—Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.
11. Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2), 213-231.
12. Belz, J. A. (2005). Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in internet-mediated language learning partnerships. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 3-39.
13. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 59(2), 189-214.
14. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59-81. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num2/biesenbachlucas
15. Blake, R. (2001). What language professionals need to know about technology. ADFL Bulletin, 32(3), 93-99.
16. Blake, R. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497-511. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
17. Blake, R. (2008). Distance learning for second and foreign language teaching. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 4, pp. 365-376). New York: Springer.
18. Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL, 16(2), 377-395.
19. Burston, J. L. (1991). Using Système-D in a classroom environment. CALICO Journal, 8(4), 51-57. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
20. Byrnes, H., & Maxim, H. H. (Eds.). (2004). Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs. Boston: Heinle Thomson.
21. Chambers, A., & Bax, S. (2006). Making CALL work: Towards normalisation. System, 34(4), 465-479.
22. Chapelle, C. A. (2005). CALICO at center stage: Our emerging rights and responsibilities. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 5-15. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
23. Chen, J., Belkada, S., & Okamoto, T. (2004). How a web-based course facilitates acquisition of English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 33-49. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/chen/default.html
24. Chenoweth, N. A., Ushida, E., & Murday, K. (2006). Student learning in hybrid French and Spanish courses: An overview of Language Online. CALICO Journal, 24(1), 115-146. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 5-15. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
25. Chun, D. M. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us? CALICO Journal, 24(2), 239-252. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 5-15. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
26. Chun, D. M., & Payne, S. J. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32(4), 481-503.
27. Daetsch, W. T. (1990). Challenges and a few cautions. CALICO Journal, 7(4), 11-18. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
28. Daud, N. M., & Husin, Z. (2004). Developing critical thinking skills in computer-aided extended reading classes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 477-487.
29. Davies, G. (2007). ICT “can do” lists for teachers of foreign languages. In G. Davies (Ed.), Information and communications technology for language teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, UK: Thames Valley University. Retrieved September 2, 2007, from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/ICT_Can_Do_Lists.doc
30. de la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 47-81.
31. Donaldson, R. P., & Haggstrom, M. A. (Eds.). (2006). Changing language education through CALL. New York: Routledge.
32. Egan, T., & Katz, I. R. (2007). Thinking beyond technology. Knowledge Quest, 35(5), 36-42.
33. Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The Impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 108-126. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num3/egbert/default.html
34. Foster, A. L. (2006). Students fall short on ‘information literacy, ’ educational testing service’s study finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(10), 1-2.
35. Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: Can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 189-212.
36. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Gates, K. F. (1998). Should colleges and universities require students to own their own computers? Cause/Effect, 21. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/html/cem/cem98/cem9839.html.
38. Goertler, S., & Winke, P. (2008). The effectiveness of technology-enhanced foreign language teaching. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 233-260). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
39. Grgurović, M., & Chapelle, C. A. (2007, May). Effectiveness of CALL: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO), San Marcos, TX.
40. Gutierrez, G. A. G. (2006). Sociocultural theory and its application to CALL: A study of the computer and its relevance as a mediational tool in the process of collaborative activity. ReCALL, 18(2), 230-251.
41. Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105-121.
42. Hanson-Smith, E. (2003). A brief history of CALL theory. CATESOL Journal, 15(1), 21-30.
43. Harker, M., & Koutsantoni, D. (2005). Can it be as effective? Distance versus blended learning in a web-based EAP programme. ReCALL, 17(2), 197-216.
44. Heift, T. (2003). Drag or type, but don’t click: A study on the effectiveness of different CALL exercise types. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée, 6(1), 69-85.
45. Hoch, F. S. (1985). Computer literacy and the foreign language teacher. CALICO Journal, 3(1), 17-32. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
46. Hoven, D. (2006). Communicating and interacting: An exploration of the changing roles of media in CALL/CMC. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 233-256. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
47. Huffaker, D., & Calvert, S. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2), n.p.
48. Johnson, E. M., & Brine, J. W. (2000). Design and development of CALL courses in Japan. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 251-268. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
49. Jones, J. F. (2001). CALL and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators, ELT Journal, 55(3), 360-367.
50. Kabata, K., & Wiebe, G. (2005). Challenge of developing and implementing multimedia courseware for a Japanese language program. CALICO Journal, 22(2), 237-250. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
51. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 183-210.
52. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
53. Koch, S. C., Mueller, B., Kruse, L., & Zumbach, J. (2005). Constructing gender in chat groups. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 53(1-2), 29-41.
54. Kolaitis, M. M. (1990). Putting computers in their place. CALICO Journal, 7(4), 51-54. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
55. Kornum, L. (1993). Foreign language teaching and learning in a multimedia environment. ReCALL, 10 (3), 65-76.
56. Lafford, P. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005). CMC technologies for teaching foreign languages: What’s on the horizon? CALICO Journal, 22(3), 679-709. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
57. Lee, L. (2004). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
58. Lee, L. (2005). Using web-based instruction to promote active learning: Learners’ perspectives. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 139-156. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
59. Levy, M. (2007). Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance. In R. P. Donaldson & M. A. Haggstrom (Eds.), Changing language education through CALL (pp. 1-18). New York: Routledge.
60. Liontas, J. I. (2002). CALL media digital technology: Whither in the new millennium? CALICO Journal, 19(2), 315-330. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
61. Liou, H.-C. (1997). Research of on-line help as learner strategies for multimedia CALL evaluation. CALICO Journal, 14(2-4), 81-96. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
62. Meskill, C., Anthony, N., Hilliker-Vanstrander, S., Tseng, C.-H., & You, J. (2006). CALL: A survey of K-12 ESOL teacher uses and preferences. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 439-451.
63. Messineo, M., & DeOllos, I. Y. (2005). Are we assuming too much? Exploring students’ perception of their computer competence. College Teaching, 53(2), 50-55.
64. Murray, D. E. (2005). Technologies for second language literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 188-201.
65. Nikolova, O. R. (2002). Effects of students’ participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/nikolova/default.html
66. Osuna, M. (2000). Promoting foreign culture acquisition via the internet in a sociocultural context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 323-345.
67. Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35-54. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/default.html
68. Salaberry, M. R. (2000a). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 5-27.
69. Salaberry, M. R. (2000b). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37.
70. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39-56.
71. Sánchez-Serrano, L. (2008). Initiation by fire: Training teachers for distance learning. In S. Goertler & P. Winke (Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices (pp. 153-174). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).
72. Sanders, R. F. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 523-532.
73. Shin, D.-S. (2006). ESL students’ computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 65-84. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/shin/default.html
74. Smith, B., Alvarez-Torres, M. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners’ online interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 703-729.
75. Spiliotopoulos, V., & Carey, S. (2005). Investigating the role of identity in writing using electronic bulletin boards. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 62(1), 87-109.
76. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57-78.
77. Strambi, A., & Bouvet, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance: A mixed-mode environment for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 81-102. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/strambi/default.html
78. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Tanskanen, S.-K. (2001). Avoiding conflict in computer-mediated discussions, or, fear of flaming. Anglicana Turkuensia, 23(2), 227-242.
80. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication Language. Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html
81. US Census Bureau (2001). Home computers and internet use in the United States: August 2000. Retrieved December 9, 2007, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf
82. US Department of Commerce (2004). A nation online: Entering the broadband age. Retrieved December 9, 2007, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/anol/NationOnlineBroadband04.htm
83. Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitude and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from https://calico.org/p-5-Calico%20Journal.html
84. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 15-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
85. White, C. (2007). Innovation and identity in distance language learning and teaching. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 97–110.
86. Yule, D. (2006). Quality technology in the language classroom: The views of graduating teachers. Babel, 41(1), 20-27, 38.
87. Zeiss, E., & Isabelli-Garcia, C. L. (2005). The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication on enhancing cultural awareness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 151-169.
88. Zena, M. (2006). Technology and teaching culture: What Spanish teachers do. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 579.