Features of CMC technologies and their impact on language learners' online interaction

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 703-729

  Smith, Bryan ^a   Alvarez Torres, María José ^b   Zhao, Yong ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL; ChatNet; Computer mediated communication; Interface features; Learner interaction; Synchronous CMC; The Palace

Indexed keywords

INTERFACES (COMPUTER); LINGUISTICS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; STUDENTS;

ONLINE INTERACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0141733231     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00011-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen T.J. Managing the flow of technology. 1977;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Anderson R.C., Spiro R.J., Montague W.E. Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. 1984;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
3. Bernhardt E., Kamil M. Enhancing foreign culture learning through electronic discussion. Muyskens J. New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education. 1998;39-55 Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston.
4. Borras (1993). Developing and assessing practicing spoken French: a multimedia program for improving skills. ETR & D, 41(4), 91-103.
5. Brent-Palmer C. A sociolinguistic assessment of the notion "immigrant semilingualism" from a social conflict perspective. Working Papers on Bilingualism. 17:1979;137-180.
6. Bromley H. Introduction. data-driven Democracy? Social assessment of educational computing Bromley H., Apple M. Education, technology, power. 1998;1-28 SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
7. Cherny L. Conversation and community: chat in a virtual world. 1999;CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
8. Chun D. Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System. 22(1):1994;17-31.
9. Chun D.M., Plass J.L. Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. Modern Language Journal. 80:1996;183-198.
10. Chun D.M., Plass J.L. Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. Warschauer M., Kern R. Networked-based language teaching: concepts and practice. 2000;151-170 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Dietz-Uhler B., Bishop-Clark C. The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions. Computers in Human Behavior. 17:2001;269-283.
12. Ess C. Cultures in collision. philosophical lessons from computer-mediated communication Metaphilosophy. 33:2002;229-253.
13. Feenberg A. Critical theory of technology. 1991;Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Gass S.M. Input, interaction, and the second language learner. 1997;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
15. Hall E.T. The silent language. 1959;Doubleday, Garden City, NY.
16. Hare P.H., Bales R.F. Seating position and small group interaction. Sociometry. 26:1963;480-486.
17. Herring S. Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 4(4):1999;. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html .
18. Herring S. Computer-mediated communication: linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. 1996;John Benjamin Publishing Company, Philadelphia, PA.
19. Johnson-Eilola J. Living on the surface. Learning in the age of global communication networks Snyder I. Page to screen. 1998;185-210 Routledge, New York.
20. Kern R. Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers. effects on quantity and characteristics of language production Modern Language Journal. 79:1995;457-476.
21. Kern R. Technology, social interaction and FL literacy. Muyskens J. New ways of learning and teaching: focus on technology and foreign language education. 1998;57-92 Heinle & Heinle Publishers, Boston.
22. Kiesler S., Siegel J., McGuire T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. The American Psychologist. 39:1984;1123-1134.
23. Krikorian D.H., Lee J., Chock T.M., Harms C. Isn't that spatial? Distance and communication in a 2-D virtual environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 5(4):2000;. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue4/krikorian.html .
24. Latour B. Aramis, or the love of technology. 1996;Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
25. Lebie L., Rhoades J.A., McGrath J.E. Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 4:1996;127-152.
26. Levy M. Computer assisted language learning: context and conceptualization. 1997;Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
27. Lohr L.L. Designing the instructional interface. Computers in Human Behavior. 16:2000;161-182.
28. Means B. Introduction. using technology to advance educational goals Means B. Technology and education reform. 1994;1-21 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
29. Mehrabian A., Diamond S.G. Seating arrangements and conversation. Sociometry. 34:1971;281-289.
30. Nardi B.A., O'Day V.L. Information ecologies: using technology with heart. 1999;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Newton N. Foundations of understanding. 1996;John Benjamin Publishing Company, Philadelphia, PA.
32. Paivio A. Mental representations. 1986;Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
33. Pica T. Research on negotiation. what does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning. 44:1994;493-527.
34. Pica T., Kanagy R., Falodun J. Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. Crookes G., Gass S. Tasks and second language learning. 1993;9-34 Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK.
35. Salaberry R. L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 13(1):2000;5-27.
36. Sacks H.E., Schegloff E., Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 50:1974;696-735.
37. Schmidt R.W. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (technical report no. 9). 1995;University of Hawaii Press, Clevedon, UK.
38. Scollon R., Scollon W.S. Intercultural communication: a discourse approach. 1995;Blackwell, New York.
39. Smith, B. (2001). Taking students to task: task-based computer-mediated communication and negotiated interaction in the ESL classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.
40. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: an expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-58.
41. Sommer R. Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. 1969;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
42. Sullivan N., Pratt E. A comparative study of two ESL writing environments. a computer assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom System. 29:1996;491-501.
43. Warschauer M. Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal. 13(2):1996;7-26.
44. Warschauer M. Electronic literacies. 1999;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
45. Werry C. Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. Herring S. Computer-mediated communication: linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. 1996;47-63 John Benjamin Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
46. Zhao Y. The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 4(4):1998;311-345.