Communicating and interacting: An exploration of the changing roles of media in CALL/CMC

CALICO Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 233-256

  Hoven, Debra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

CMC; Collaborative learning; Exploratory learning; Learning environments; Multimedia

Indexed keywords

EID: 36949021642     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v23i2.233-256     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abrams, Z. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and group journals: Expanding the repertoire of participant roles. System, 29, 489-503.
2. Appel, C., & Gilabert, R. (2002). Motivation and task performance in a task-based web-based tandem project. ReCALL, 14 (1), 16-31.
3. Ashworth, D. (1996). Hypermedia and CALL. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 79-95). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
4. Backer, J. (2001, May). Using a modular approach to schMOOze with ESL/EFL students. The Internet TESL Journal, VII (5). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://iteslj. org/Lessons/Backer-SchMOOze.html
5. Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French stu-dents. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 (3), 507-531.
6. Bickerton, D. (1999). Authoring and the academic linguist: The challenge of multimedia CALL. In K. Cameron (Ed.), Media, design and applications (pp. 59-79). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
7. Brett, P. (1995). Multimedia for listening comprehension: The design of a multimedia-based resource for developing listening skills. System, 23 (1), 77-85.
8. Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (1). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1/index.html
9. Chen, P. (1992). An epistemic analysis of the interaction between knowledge, educa-tion, and technology. In E. Barrett (Ed.), Sociomedia: Multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge (pp. 161-173). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
10. Coleman, D., & Kessler, G. (2004, June). The Langland Project. Paper presented at CALICO 2004, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Accessible at http://co arts_faculty.utoledo.edu/dcoleman/Langlang
11. Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous com-puter-mediated communication by training. Communication Research, 30 (2), 147-177.
12. Constanzo, W. (1992). Reading, writing, and thinking in an age of electronic literacy. In M. C. Tuman (Ed.), Literacy online (pp. 11-21). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13. Davies, L. B., Shield, L., & Weininger, M. J. (1998). ReTOOling MOOs. Teaching in the Community Colleges (Electronic) Journal, 3, Spring. Retrieved May 30, 2004, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon/paper/davies.html
14. Downes, S. (2000, July). Nine rules for good technology. New Media. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.newstrolls.com/news/dev/downes/column000307.htm
15. eTandem. (n.d.). Accessible at http://www.slf.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
16. Felix, U. (2001). Beyond Babel: Language learning online. Melbourne: Language Aus-tralia.
17. Felix, U. (2002). The web as a vehicle for constructivist approaches in language learning. ReCALL, 14 (1), 2-15.
18. Felix, U. (2003). Teaching languages online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 118-138. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/felix.html
19. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
20. Ganderton, R. (1999). Interactivity in L2 web-based reading. In R. Debski. & M. Levy (Eds.), WORLDCALL: global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 49-66). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
21. Gibson, S. E. (2002). Using a problem based multimedia enhanced approach in learning about teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 18, (3), 394-409. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/gib-son.html
22. Hailey, D., Grant-Davie, K., & Hult, C. (2001). Online education horror stories worthy of Halloween: A short list of problems and solutions in online instruction. Computers and Composition, 18, 387-397.
23. Hartman, A., Diem, J. D., & Quagliana, M. (1992). The many faces of multimedia: How new technologies might change the nature of the academic endeavour. In E. Barrett (Ed.), Sociomedia: Multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge (pp. 175-192). Cambridge. The MIT Press.
24. Haythornthwaite, C. (1999, December). Networks of information sharing among com-puter-supported distance learners. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1999, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/CSCL99/papers/monday/Caroline_HaythornthwaitA79.pdf
25. Herrington, J., & Oliver, O. (1997). Multimedia, magic and the way students respond to a situated learning environment. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 13 (2), 127-143. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet13/herrington.html
26. Hoadley, C. M., & Enyedy, N. (1999, December). Between information and communica-tion: Middle spaces in computer media for learning. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1999, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/CSCL99/papers/monday/Chris_Hoadley_242.pdf
27. Hogan-Brun, G., & Laux, H. (2001). Specialist gateways through chaos: A changing learning environment. System, 29, 253-265.
28. Hoven, D. (1997). Improving the management of flow of control in computer-assisted listening comprehension tasks for second and foreign language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Accessible at http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/cryptsoft/dlh/thesis
29. Hoven, D. (2003). Strategic uses of CALL: What learners use and how they react. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S No. 17, ʻAsian Languages and Computers,ʼ 125-147.
30. Jonassen (1992). MISSING
31. Kabata, K., & Yang, X. J. (2002). Developing multimedia lesson modules for intermediate Japanese. CALICO Journal, 19 (3), 563-570.
32. Kalyuga, S. (2000). When using sound with a text or picture is not beneficial for learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (2), 161-172. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/kalyuga.html
33. Keppel (2001). MISSING
34. Khine, M. S., & Lourdusamy, A. (2003). Using Conversant Media as a collaborative learning tool in teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (2), 260-274. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet19/khine.html
35. Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4 (3), 355-383.
36. Kötter, M., Shield, L., & Stevens, A. (1999). Real-time audio and email for fluency: Promoting distance language learnersʼ oral and aural skills via the Internet. ReCALL, 11 (2), 55-60.
37. Liontas, J. I. (2002). CALLmedia digital technology: Whither in the new millennium? CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 315-330.
38. Murphy-Judy, K. (1997). Literacies for foreign language learners in the information age. In K. Murphy-Judy (Ed.), Nexus: The convergence of language teaching and research using technology (pp. 133-144). Durham, NC: CALICO.
39. Murray, D. (2000). Changing technologies, changing literacy communities? Language Learning & Technology, 4 (2), 43-58. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://llt. msu.edu/vol4num2/murray/default.html
40. Oliver, R. & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materi-als. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 11 (2), 8-22. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet11/oliver.html
41. Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., & H.-Lemonnier, F. (2003). Crossing boundaries: Multimedia technology and pedagogical innovation in a high school class. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (1), 28-45. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://llt. msu.edu/vol7num1/parks/default.html
42. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20 (1), 7-32.
43. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Plass, J., Chun, D., Mayer, R., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (1), 25-36.
45. Plass, J., Chun, D., Mayer, R., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abili-ties. Computers and Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.
46. Raphan, D. (1996). A multimedia approach to academic listening. TESOL Journal, 6 (2) 24-28.
47. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televi-sion, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Stanford, California: CSLI Publications & Cambridge University Press.
48. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
49. Rose (1999). MISSING
50. SchMOOzeU. (n. d.). Accessible at http://schmooze.hunter.cuny.edu
51. Schwienhorst (2003). MISSING
52. Selfe, C., & Hilligoss, S. (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
53. Shawback, M., & Terhune, N. (2002). Online interactive courseware: Using movies to promote cultural understanding in a CALL environment. ReCALL, 14 (1), 85-95.
54. Shield L., Davies, L. B., & Weininger, M. J. (2000). Fostering (pro)active language learning through MOO. ReCALL, 12 (1), 35-48.
55. Sims, R. (2000). An interactive conundrum: Constructs of interactivity and learning theory. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (1), 45-57. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet16/sims.html
56. Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (5), 391-411.
57. Smith, B. (2003). The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communica-tion. System, 31 (1), 29-53.
58. Son, J-B. (2003). A hypertext approach to foreign language reading: Student attitudes and perceptions. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S No. 17, ʻAsian Languages and Computersʼ, 91-110.
59. Söntgens, K. (1999, December). Language learning via e-mail—Autonomy through col-laboration. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 1999, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/CSCL99/papers/wednesday/Kirsten_Sontgens_567.pdf
60. Stevens, V. (2002). A day in the life of an online language educator. TESL-EJ, 6 (3). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej23/int.html
61. Stevens, V. (2004). The skill of communication: Technology brought to bear on the art of language learning. TESL-EJ, 7 (4). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://cwp60.berkeley.edu:16080/TESL-EJ/ej28/int.html
62. Summerville, J. (1999). Role of awareness of cognitive style in hypermedia. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1). Retrieved October 4, 2005, from http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v1n1/summerville/index.html
63. TappedIn. (n.d.) Accessible at http://tappedin.org/tappedin
64. Tudor, I. (2003). Learning to live with complexity: Towards an ecological perspective on language teaching. System, 31 (1), 1-12.
65. Tuman, M. (1996). Literacy online. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 26-45.
66. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Socio-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Webheads (n.d.). Accessible at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/4631/papers/evonline2002/webheads.htm
68. Weinberg, A. (2002). Virtual misadventures: Technical problems and student satisfaction when implementing multimedia in an advanced French listening comprehension course. CALICO Journal, 19 (2), 331-357.
69. Weininger, M. J., & Shield, L. (2003). Promoting oral production in a written channel: An investigation of learner language in MOO. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 (4), 329-349.