ESL students' computer-mediated communication practices: Context configuration

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 65-84

  Shin, Dong Shin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748575919     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Excerpts from discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
3. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/BELZ/default.html.
4. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/belz/default.html
5. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(2), 189-214.
6. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.
7. Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 71-89.
8. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
9. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22(1), 17-31.
10. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gebhard, M. (2004). Fast capitalism and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 245-265.
12. Gibson, J. J. (1979). An ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
14. Grossman, P., Smagorinsky, P., & Valencia, S. (1999). Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education, 108(1) 1-29.
15. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriated methodology and social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap020557/02a00020/0?frame=noframe&userID= 9455d2d1@amhers t.edu/01cce440357b731034d3e4c10&dpi=3&config=jstor - http://www.jstor.org/view/00267902/ap02/
18. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853-866.
20. Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.
22. Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145-172. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter/default.html
23. Kramsch, C. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 169-183.
24. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Kramsch, C. (2000). Language and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
27. Kramsch, C., & Lam, E. (2003). The ecology of an SLA community. In J. H. Leather & J. van Dam. (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 141-158). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as a global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
29. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482.
30. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html
31. Lantolf, J. (2000a). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. Lantolf, J. (2000b). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Learning, 33(2), 79-96.
33. Leander, K., & McKim, K. (2003). Tracing the everyday 'Sittings' of adolescents on the Internet: A strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 211-240.
34. Leather, J. H., & van Dam, J. (Eds.). (2003). Ecology of language acquisition. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35. Lee, N. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num1/lee/default.html
36. McDonald, A., & McDonald, G. (1996). Intensive English programs newsletter, 1994-1996. Intensive English Programs Newsletter, 12-13.
37. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian Class. System, 33(1), 89-105.
38. Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Curriculum innovation in TEFL: A study of technologies supporting socio-collaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 20-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
39. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/index.html
40. Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In G. Herdt, R. Shweder, & J. Stigler. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 287-308). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
42. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-39. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
43. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Rex, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., & the Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group. (1998). Critical issues: What counts when context counts?: The uncommon "common" language of literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(3), 407-433.
45. Schieffelin, B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 163-191.
46. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2001). Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
47. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.
48. Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
49. Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 115-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language learning and technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html
51. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/default.html
52. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html
53. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordances: Social interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133-153). New York: Oxford University Press.
54. van Lier, L. (2002). Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Ware, P. (2005). "Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89. Retrieved July 28, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num2/ware/default.html
57. Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.
58. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.
59. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Warschauer, M. (2000). On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern. (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Philadelphia: Benjamins.
62. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-503.
64. Yu, T., & Wen, T. (2003). Crisis communication in Chinese culture. Asian Journal of Communication, 13 (2), 50-65.
65. th ed., pp. 77-88). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.