The Cross-linguistic Development of Address Form Use in Telecollaborative Language Learning: Two Case Studies

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 189-214

  Belz, Julie A ^a   Kinginger, Celeste ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242329694     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.59.2.189     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Ager, D.E. (1990). Sociolinguistics and contemporary French. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bayer, K. (1979). Die anredepronomina Du and Sie. Deutsche Sprache, 3, 212-219.
3. Belz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based foreign language teaching. ReCALL, 13(2), 213-231.
4. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
5. Belz, J. A. & Mũller-Hartmann, A. (2002). Deutsch-amerikanische Telekollaboration im Fremdsprachenunterricht - Lernende im Kreuzfeuer der institutionellen Zwänge. [German-American telecollaboration in foreign language teaching - Learners in the crossfire of institutional constraints. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 35(1), 72-82.
6. Belz, J. A. & Müller-Hartmann, A. (in press). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 72-90.
7. Brown, R. & Gilman, A. (1960), The pronouns of power and solidarity. Reprinted (1970) in R. Brown (Ed.), Psycholinguisitcs (pp. 302-335). New York: The Free Press.
8. Calvet, L.-J. (1976). A tu et à toi. Le Français dans le monde, 118, 14-18.
9. Chapelle, C. (2000). Is network-based learning CALL? In M. Warschauer & R. Kern, (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, (pp. 204-228). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Delisle, H. (1986). Intimacy, solidarity, and distance: The pronouns of address in German. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 19(1), 4-15.
11. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. FirstClass.(2001). [computer software].Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada: Centricity.
13. Gardner-Chloros, P. (1991). Ni tu ni vous: Principes et paradoxes dans l'emploi des pronoms d'allocution en français contemporain. French Language Studies, 1, 139-155.
14. Glück, H. & Sauer, W. (1990). Gegenwartsdeutsch. Stuttgart: Metzler. (8. Kapitel: Du und ich reden über dich und mich.)
15. Hall, J. K. (2001). Creating communities of language learners. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Hall, J.K. & Verplaetse, L.S. (2000). (Eds.) Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Kanagy, R. (1999) Interactional routines as a mechanism for L2 acquisition and socialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1467-1492.
18. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From metaprocesses to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95-147.
19. Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research 8, 203-231.
20. Kasper, G. & Rose, K. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 91-104.
21. Kasper, G. & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 149-169.
22. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
23. Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warshauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 105-119). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
24. Kern, R. & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern, (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 502-513.
26. Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J.K. Hall & L.S. Verplaetse, (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, V., & Simpson, A. (1999). A telecollaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853-866.
28. Kramsch, C. (1985a). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2) 169-183.
29. Kramsch, C. (1985b). Literary texts in the classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 69(4), 356-366.
30. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern language Journal, 54(3), 311-326.
31. Kretzenberger, H. L. & Segebrecht, W. (1991). Vom Sie zum Du-mehr als eine neue Konvention? Hamburg: Luchterhand.
32. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (Second (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). New York: Longman.
34. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. McGroarty, M. (1998). Constructive and constructivist challenges for applied linguistics. Language Learning, 48(4), 591-622.
36. McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113-128.
37. Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (1998). Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Arnold.
38. Morford, J. (1997). Social indexicality in French pronomial address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1), 3-37.
39. Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147.
40. Ochs, E. (1986). Introduction. In B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 1-13). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Pavlenko, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re)construction of selves. In J.P. Lantolf, (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-177). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Roberts, C. (1999). Acquisition des langues ou socialisation dans et par le discours? Pour une redéfinition du domaine de la recherche sur l'acquisition des langues étrangères. Languages, 34, 101-115.
43. Rose, K. R. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27-67.
44. Rymes, B. (1997). Second language socialization: A new approach to second language acquisition research. Journal of Intensive English Studies, 11, 143-55.
45. Salaberry, R. (1999). CALL in the Year 2000: Still developing the research agenda. A commentary on Carol Chapelle's CALL in the Year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 104-107
46. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. (2nd ed.). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
47. Snow, C. E., Perlmann, R. Y., Gleason, J. B. & Hooshyar, N. (1990). Developmental perspectives on politeness: Sources of children's knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 289-305.
48. Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf, (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 254-269). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Vonder Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kotter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOS). Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 210-225.
50. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Warschauer, M. (1995). Virtual connections. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
52. Warschauer, M. (ed.). (1996). Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawai'i Symposium. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
53. Warschauer, M. (1998). On-line learning in sociocultural context. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(3), 68-88.
54. Warschauer, M. & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.