CALL: A survey of K-12 ESOL teacher uses and preferences

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 439-451

  Meskill, Caria ^a   Anthony, Natasha ^a   Hilliker Vanstrander, Shannon ^a   Tseng, Chi Hua ^a   You, Jieun ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947365230     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40264532     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(51). Retrieved May, 10, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/
2. Becker, H., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 356-384.
3. Brett, P. (1997). A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension. System, 25, 39-53.
4. Carman, L. (2003). Pedagogy, connectivity, multimodality and interdisciplinarity. Research Quarterly, 38, 397-403.
5. Chiero, T. (1997). Teachers' perspectives on factors that affect computer use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 133-145.
6. Chun, D. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
7. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Doherty, K. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2001). Student survey says: Schools arc probably not using educational technology as wisely or effectively as they could. Education Week, 20(35), 45-48.
9. Gulcan, E. (2003). Exploring ESL: Learner's use of hypermedia reading glosses. CALICO Journal, 3(4), 75-91.
10. Hagood, M. C. (2003). New media and online literacies. Research Quarterly, 38, 387-391.
11. Jaber, W. E., & Moore, D. M. (1999). A survey of factors which influence teachers' use of computer-based technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26, 253-266.
12. Jakobsdottir, S., & Hooper, S. (1995) Computer-assisted foreign language learning: Effects of text, context, and gender on listening comprehension and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(4), 43-59.
13. Jones, L., & Plass, J. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 546-561.
14. Kelm, O. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
15. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
16. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
17. Light, J. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 709-733.
18. Mackay, M. (2003). Researching new forms of literacy. Research Quarterly, 38, 403-407.
19. Merler, S. (2000). Understanding multimedia dialogues in a foreign language. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 16(2), 148-159.
20. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005) Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian class. System, 33, 89-105.
21. Meskill, C., & Mossop,J. (2000) Technologies use with learners of English as a second language. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 265-284.
22. Nikolova, O. (2002). Effects of students' participation in authoring of multimedia materials on' student acquisition of vocabulary. Language, Learning & Technology 6(1), 100-122. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6numl /NIKOLOVA/dcfault.html
23. Rowand, C. (2000). Teacher use of computers and the Internet in public schools (NCES 2000090). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. aspppubids2000090
24. Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., lannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers'use of technology (NCES 2000102). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid=2000102
25. Stenson, N., Downing, B., Smith, J., & Smith, K. (1992). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training, CALICO Journal, 9(4), 5-20.
26. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
27. Williams, C. (2000). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-99 (NCES 2000086). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo. asp?pubid=2000086
28. Wood,J. (2001). Can software support children's vocabulary development? Language, learning & Technology 5(1), 166-201. Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/wood/default.html