Teachers' Voices on Integrating Metacognition into Science Education

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 3161-3193

  Ben David, Adi ^a   Orion, Nir ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Earth Systems Approach (ESA); In service teacher training (INST); Metacognition; Teachers' pedagogical thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885055023     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2012.697208     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Akerson, V. L. 2004. Learning as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers' views of nature of science. Science Education, 88 (5): 785 - 810. (doi:10.1002/sce.10143)
2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Akerson, V. L. 2009. The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (16): 2161 - 2184. (doi:10.1080/09500690802563324)
3. Abd-El-Khalick, F. and Lederman, N. G. 2000. Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature science: A critical review. International Journal of Science Education, 22: 665 - 701. (doi:10.1080/09500690050044044)
4. Adams, P. E. and Krockover, G. H. 1997. Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34: 633 - 665. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<633::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-O)
5. Arabsolghar, F. and Elkins, J. 2001. Teachers' expectations about students' use of reading strategies, knowledge and behavior in Grades 3, 5 and 7. Journal of Research in Reading, 24 (2): 154 - 162. (doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00138)
6. Baird, J. R. 1986. Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8 (3): 263 - 282. (doi:10.1080/0140528860080303)
7. Baird, J. R. and Mitchell, I. J. 1987. Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study. The PEEL Project, Melbourne: Monash University Press.
8. Baker, L. 1994. " Fostering metacognitive development ". In Advances in child development and behavior, Edited by: Reese, H. W. Vol. 25, 201 - 239. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. Ben-David, A. and Zohar, A. 2008. Contribution of meta-strategic knowledge to scientific inquiry learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (12): 1427 - 1443.
10. Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O. and Orion, N. 2005. The development of system thinking skills in the context of Earth system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42: 1 - 43. (doi:10.1002/tea.20058)
11. Borko, H. and Putman, R. T. 1996. " Learning to teach". In Handbook of educational psychology: A project of Division 15, the division of educational psychology of the American Psychological Association Edited by: Berliner, D. C. and Calfee, R. C. (Chapter 20, pp. 673-708) New York, NY: Macmillan
12. Brickhouse, N. W. 1990. Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3): 53 - 62. (doi:10.1177/002248719004100307)
13. Brown, A. L. 1978. " Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition ". In Advances in instructional psychology, Edited by: Glaser, R. Vol. 1, 77 - 165. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14. Brown, A. L. 1994. The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23 (8): 4 - 12. (doi:10.3102/0013189X023008004)
15. Cardelle-Elawar, M. 1995. Effects of teaching metacognitive skills to students with low mathematics ability. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8: 109 - 121. (doi:10.1016/0742-051X(92)90002-K)
16. Carter, K. 1990. " Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach ". In Handbook of research on teacher education, Edited by: Houston, R. W. 291 - 310. New York, NY: Macmillan.
17. Chen, Z. and Klahr, D. 1999. All other thing being equal: Children's acquisition of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70: 1098 - 1120. (doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00081)
18. Ciardiello, A. V. 1998. Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42: 210 - 219.
19. Clark, C. M. and Peterson, P. L. 1986. " Teachers' thought Processes ". In Handbook of research on teaching, 3, Edited by: Wittrock, M. C. 255 - 296. New York, NY: Macmillan.
20. Cocharn, K. F. and Jones, A. L. 1998. " The subject matter knowledge of pre-service science teachers ". In International handbook of science education, Edited by: Fraser, B. and Tobin, K. 707 - 718. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
21. Dodick, J. and Orion, N. 2003. Cognitive factors effecting student understanding of geologic time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40: 415 - 442. (doi:10.1002/tea.10083)
22. Efklides, A. 2006. Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1: 3 - 14. (doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001)
23. Flavell, J. H. 1976. " Metacognitive aspects of problem solving ". In The nature of intelligence, Edited by: Resnick, L. B. 231 - 235. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34: 906 - 911. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906)
25. Forgas, J. P. 1994. The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an affect infusion model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24: 1 - 24. (doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240102)
26. Fullan, M. 1992. Successful school improvement, London: Open University Press.
27. Fullan, M. 1993. Change force, London: The Falmer Press.
28. Garner, R. 1988. " Verbal-report data on cognitive and metacognitive strategies ". In Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation, Edited by: Weinstein, C. E., Goetz, E. T. and Alexander, P. A. 63 - 76. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Gibton, D. 2001. " Grounded theory: The significant of data analysis processes and theory construction in qualitative research ". In Genres and tradition in qualitative research, Edited by: Sabar, N. 195 - 228. Israel: Dvir. (in Hebrew)
30. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine.
31. Hand, B., Treagust, D. F. and Vance, K. 1997. Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom. Science Education, 81 (5): 561 - 575. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199709)81:5<561::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-8)
32. Hashweh, M. Z. 1996. Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (1): 47 - 63. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P)
33. Kali, Y., Orion, N. and Alon, B. 2003. The effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (6): 545 - 565. (doi:10.1002/tea.10096)
34. Koriat, A. and Levy-Sadot, R. 2000. Conscious and unconscious metacognition: A rejoinder. Consciousness and Cognition, 9: 139 - 202.
35. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R. and Arami, M. 2002. The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational studies in mathematics, 49: 225 - 250. (doi:10.1023/A:1016282811724)
36. Kuhn, D. 1999. " Metacognitive development ". In Child psychology, a handbook of contemporary issues, Edited by: Balter, L. and Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. 259 - 286. Ann Arbor, MI: Taylor and Francis.
37. Lederman, N. G. 1992. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26 (9): 771 - 783.
38. Lifford, J., Byron, B. E. and Ziemian, J. 2000. Reading, responding, and reflecting. English Journal, 89: 46 - 57. (doi:10.2307/821984)
39. Mevarech, Z. R. 1999. Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 92 (4): 195 - 205. (doi:10.1080/00220679909597597)
40. Mevarech, Z.R., & Fridkin, S. (2006, July). Who benefits from IMPROVE? The differential effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge and reasoning, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Israel. Paper presented at SIG16 Metacognition Conference, Cambridge, UK.
41. Mevarech, Z. R. and Kramarski, B. 1997. IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for reaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34: 365 - 394. (doi:10.3102/00028312034002365)
42. Nelson, T. O. 1996. Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51: 102 - 116. (doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102)
43. Nelson, T. O. and Narens, L. 1994. " Why investigate metacognition? ". In Metacognition: Knowing about knowing Edited by: Metcalfe, J. and Shimamura, A. P. (Chapter 1, pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
44. Orion, N. 2007. A holistic approach for science education for all. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3 (2): 99 - 106.
45. Orion, N. and Fortner, W. R. 2003. Mediterranean models for integrating environmental education and earth sciences through earth systems education. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8 (1): 97 - 111.
46. Orion, N. and Kali, Y. 2005. The effect of an earth-science learning program on students' scientific thinking skills. Journal of Geosciences Education, 53: 387 - 393.
47. Paris, S. G. and Paris, A. H. 2001. Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36 (2): 89 - 101. (doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4)
48. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. and Gertzog, W. A. 1982. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66: 211 - 227. (doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207)
49. Prawat, R. 1992. Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education,: 354 - 395. (doi:10.1086/444021)
50. Reder, L. M. and Schunn, C. D. 1996. " Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory ". In Implicit memory and metacognition, Edited by: Reder, L. M. 45 - 77. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Sabar, N. 1990. Qualitative research in teaching and learning, Israel: Masada. (in Hebrew)
52. Schnotz, W. 1992. " Metacognition and self regulation in text processing: Some comments ". In Learning and instruction. European research in an international context, Edited by: Carretero, M., Pope, M. L., Simons, R. J. and Pozo, J. I. Vol. 3, 365 - 375. Elsmford, NY: Pergamon Press.
53. Schraw, G. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructinal Science, 26: 113 - 125. (doi:10.1023/A:1003044231033)
54. Shelley, A. C. and Thomas, P. L. 1996. Using metacognitive strategies to enhance learning in the English classroom. The New England Reading Association Journal, 32: 3 - 6.
55. Shulman, L. S. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15: 4 - 14. (doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004)
56. Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1): 1 - 22.
57. Southerland, S., Sinatra, G. and Matthews, M. R. 2001. Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (4): 325 - 351. (doi:10.1023/A:1011913813847)
58. Spradley, J. P. 1980. Participant observation, New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
59. Sternberg, R. J. 1998. Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student?. Instructional Science, 26: 127 - 140. (doi:10.1023/A:1003096215103)
60. Strauss, S. and Shilony, T. 1994. " Teachers' models of children's minds and learning ". In Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture, Edited by: Hirshfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A. 455 - 473. Cambridge University Press.
61. Teong, S. K. 2003. The effect of metacognitive training on mathematical word-problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (1): 46 - 55. (doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00005.x)
62. Thomas, G.P. (1992). An investigation into the transfer of cognitive strategies (Unpublished med. studies, thesis). Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
63. Thomas, G. P. 1999. Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in enhancing students' learning processes. Research in Science Education, 29: 89 - 109. (doi:10.1007/BF02461182)
64. Thomas, G. P. 2003. Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale-science (MOLES-S). Learning Environments Research, 6: 175 - 197. (doi:10.1023/A:1024943103341)
65. Thomas, G. P. 2004. Dimensionality and construct validity of an instrument designed to measure the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5: 367 - 384.
66. Thomas, G. P. 2009. " The centrality of metacognition for science education reform: Challenging the status quo ". In Proceedings of the international conference on educational research: Learning communities for sustainable development, Edited by: Kuroda, A., Tanunchaibutra, P., Ya-Ampan, D., Namwong, O., Bhiasiri, S. and Thongpai, J. 17 - 30. Khon Kaen: Anna Offset.
67. Thomas, G. P. 2011. " Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations ". In Second international handbook of science education, Edited by: Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G. and McRobbie, C. J. 131 - 144. Dordrecht: Springer.
68. Thomas, G. P. and McRobbie, C. J. 2001. Using a metaphor for learning to improve students' metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 (2): 222 - 259. (doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<222::AID-TEA1004>3.0.CO;2-S)
69. Thomas, K. F. and Barksdale-Ladd, M. A. 2000. Metacognitive processes: Teaching strategies in literacy education courses. Reading Psychology, 21: 67 - 84. (doi:10.1080/027027100278356)
70. Tobin, K. 1993. Referents for making sense of science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15: 241 - 254. (doi:10.1080/0950069930150302)
71. Toth, E. E., Klahr, D. and Chen, Z. 2000. Bridging research and practice: A cognitively based classroom intervention for teaching experimentation skills to elementary school children. Cognition and instruction, 18: 423 - 459. (doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_1)
72. Veenman, M. V.J. 1993. Intellectual ability and metacognitive skill: Determinants of discovery learning in computerized learning environments, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
73. Veenman, M. V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H.A.M. and Afflerbach, P. 2006. Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1: 3 - 14. (doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0)
74. Von Glaserfeld, E. 1995. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning, London: The Palmer Press.
75. White, B. Y. and Frederiksen, J. R. 1998. Inquiry, modeling and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1): 3 - 118. (doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2)
76. White, B. Y. and Frederiksen, J. R. 2000. " Metacognition facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all ". In Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science, Edited by: Minstrell, J. L. and Van-Zee, E. H. 331 - 370. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
77. White, R. T. and Mitchell, I. J. 1994. Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23: 21 - 37. (doi:10.1080/03057269408560028)
78. Zohar, A. 1999. Teachers' metacognitive knowledge and instruction of higher order thinking. Teaching and Teachers' Education, 15: 413 - 429. (doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00063-8)
79. Zohar, A. 2004. Higher order thinking in science classrooms: Students' learning and teacher' professional development, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
80. Zohar, A. 2006. The nature and development of teachers' metastrategic knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 15 (3): 331 - 377. (doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_2)
81. Zohar, A. 2008. Teaching thinking on a national scale: Israel's pedagogical horizons. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3: 77 - 81. (doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.002)
82. Zohar, A. and Ben-David, A. 2008. Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3: 59 - 82. (doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9019-4)
83. Zohar, A. and Ben-David, A. 2009. Paving a clear path in a thick forest: A conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition and Learning,: 1556 - 1623.
84. Zohar, A. and Peled, B. 2008. The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 18: 337 - 353. (doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.001)