Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis

The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 347-366

  Charmaz, Kathy ^a   Belgrave, Linda Liska ^b  

^a SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949741152     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218403.n25     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Ahmad, F., Hudak, P. L., Bercovitz, K., Hollenberg, E., & Levinson, W. (2006). Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(3), e22.
2. Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103-126.
3. Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. New York, NY: Rowan & Littlefield.
4. Beard, R. L., Fetterman, D. J., Wu, B., & Bryant, L. (2009). The two voices of Alzheimer's: Attitudes toward brain health by diagnosed individuals and support persons. The Gerontologist, 49, S40-S49.
5. Belgrave, L. L., Allen-Kelsey, G. J., Smith, K. J., & Flores, M. C. (2004). Living with dementia: Lay definitions of Alzheimer's disease among African American caregivers and sufferers. Symbolic Interaction, 27, 199-222.
6. Belgrave, L. L., & Smith, K. J. (1995). Negotiated validity in collaborative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 69-86.
7. Bergman, M. M. (2008a). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bergman, M. M. (2008b). The straw men of the qualitative-quantitative divide and their influence on mixed methods research. In M. M. Bergman (ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 11-21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8, 137-152.
11. Bringer, J. D., Johnston, L. H., & Brackenridge, C. H. (2006). Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis to develop grounded theory project. Field Methods, 18, 245-256.
12. Bryant, A. (2002). Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4, 25-42.
13. Bryant, A. (2003). A constructive/ist response to Glaser. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/viewArticle/757/1642
14. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007a). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31-57). London, England: Sage.
15. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007b). Introduction. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 1-28). London, England: Sage.
16. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In M. R. Emerson (ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109-126). Boston, MA: Little-Brown.
17. Charmaz, K. (1990). Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science and Medicine, 30, 1161-1172.
18. Charmaz, K. (1991). Translating graduate qualitative methods into undergraduate teaching: Intensive interviewing as a case example. Teaching Sociology, 19, 384-395.
19. Charmaz, K. (1995). Body, identity, and self: Adapting to impairment. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 657-680.
20. Charmaz, K. (1999). Stories of suffering: Subjects' stories and research narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 362-382.
21. Charmaz, K. (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 675-694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: Sage.
25. Charmaz, K. (2007). Constructionism and grounded theory. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 35-53). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26. Charmaz, K. (2008a). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith (ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed., pp. 81-110). London, England: Sage.
27. Charmaz, K. (2008b). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (eds.), The handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155-170). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28. Charmaz, K. (2009a). The legacy of Anselm Strauss for constructivist grounded theory. In N. K. Denzin (ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 32, pp. 127-141). Bingley, England: Emerald.
29. Charmaz, K. (2009b). Recollecting good and bad days. In A. Puddephatt, W. Shaffir, & S. Kleinknecht (eds.), Ethnographies revisited: Constructing theory in the field (pp. 48-62). London, England: Routledge.
30. Charmaz, K. (2009c). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods for the twenty-first century. In J. Morse, P. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. Clarke, Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127-154). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
31. Charmaz, K. (2009d). Stories, silences, and self: Dilemmas in disclosing chronic illness (Expanded version). In D. E. Brashers & D. J. Goldstein (eds.), Communicating to manage health and illness (pp. 240-270). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Charmaz, K. (2010). Studying the experience of chronic illness through grounded theory. In G. Scambler & S. Scambler (eds.), New directions in the sociology of chronic and disabling condition: Assaults on the lifeworld (pp. 8-36). London, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
33. Charmaz, K. (2011). A constructivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, L. J. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden, Five ways of doing grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. Charmaz, K., & Bryant, A. (2011). Grounded theory and credibility. In D. Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method and practice (3rd ed., pp. 291-309). London, England: Sage.
35. Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analysis: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 553-576.
36. Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Clarke, A. E. (2006). Feminisms, grounded theory, and situational analysis. In S. Hesse-Biber & D. Leckenby (eds.), Handbook of feminist research methods (pp. 345-370). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Clarke, A. E. (2009). From grounded theory to situational analysis. In J. Morse, P. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. Clarke, Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 194-233). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
39. Clarke, A. E., & Friese, C. (2007). Situational analysis: Going beyond traditional grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (eds.), The handbook of grounded theory (pp. 694-743). London, England: Sage.
40. Corbin, J. (2008). Preface. In J. Corbin & A. Strauss (eds.), Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. vii-xiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Corbin, J. (2009). Taking an analytic journey. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clarke (eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 35-53). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
42. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Creswell, J. W. (2009a). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 95-108.
44. Creswell, J. W. (2009b). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Creswell, J. W, & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Editorial: Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 303-308.
46. Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45(4), 483-499.
47. Denzin, N. K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9, 139-160.
48. Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2009). Qualitative inquiry and social justice: Toward a politics of hope. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
49. Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Ezzy, D. (2010). Qualitative interviewing as an embodied emotional performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 163-170.
51. Ferreira, A., Antunes, L., Chadwick, D., & Correia, R. (2010). Grounding information security in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 268-283.
52. Fielding, N. (2008). Analytic density, postmodernism, and applied multiple method research. In M. M. Bergman (ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 37-52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Foster-Fishman, P., Nowell, B., Deacon, Z., Nievar, M. A., & McCann, P. (2005). Using methods that matter: The impact of reflection, dialogue, and voice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3/4), 275-291.
55. Fox, F. E., Rumsey, N., & Morris, M. (2007). "Ur skin is the thing that everyone sees and you cant change it!" Exploring the appearance-related concerns of young people with psoriasis. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 10, 133-141.
56. Furness, P., Garrud, P., Faulder, A., & Swift, J. (2006). Coming to terms: A grounded theory study of adaptation to facial surgery in adulthood. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 453-466.
57. Ginsburg, L. R., Chuang, Y.-T., Norton, P. G., Berta, W., Treguhng, D., Ng, P., & Richardson, J. (2009). Development of a measure of patient safety event learning responses. Health Services Research, 44, 2123-2147.
58. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
59. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
60. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
61. Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
62. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
63. Gubrium, E., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). Contending with border making in the social constructionist interview. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 689-715.
64. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1996). The teller, the tale, and the one being told: The narrative nature of the research interview. Curriculum Inquiry, 26(3), 293-306.
65. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59-82.
66. Hesse-Biber, S. (2010a). Emerging methodologies and methods practices in the field of mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 415-418.
67. Hesse-Biber, S. (2010b). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 455-468.
68. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods, 1, 112-133.
70. Konopásek, Z. (2007). Making thinking visible with ATLAS.ti: Computer assisted qualitative analysis as textual practices. Historical Social Research (Suppl. 19), 276-298.
71. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 228-237.
73. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
74. Madriz, E. I. (1998). Using focus groups with lower socioeconomic status Latina women. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 114-128.
75. Maines, D. R. (2001). Writing the self vs. writing the other: Comparing autobiographical and life history data. Symbolic Interaction, 24(1), 105-111.
76. Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.
77. Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1-10.
78. Moore, J. L. (2006). A qualitative investigator of African American males' career trajectory in engineering: Implications for teachers, school counselors, and parents. Teachers College Record, 108, 246-266.
79. Morgan, D. L. (2002). Focus group interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 141-159). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80. Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147-149.
81. Morse, J. M. (2008). Serving two masters: The qualitatively-driven, mixed-method approach. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1607-1608.
82. Morse, J. M. (2009). Tussles, tensions, and resolutions. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clark (eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 13-22). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
83. Peters, V., & Wester, F. (2007). How qualitative data analysis software may support the qualitative analysis process. Quality & Quantity, 41, 635-659.
84. Raz, A. (2005). A note on inter-viewing: Using symbolic interactionism for interview analysis. Studies in Symbolic Interactionism, 28, 323-339.
85. Robrecht, L. C. (1995). Grounded theory: Evolving methods. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 169-177.
86. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Ryan, G. W, & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85-109.
88. Scheibelhofer, E. (2008). Combining narration-based interviews with topical interviews: Methodological reflections on research practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 403-416.
89. Seale, C. (2002). Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative interview data. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 651-670). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
91. Silverman, D. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. London, England: Sage.
92. Strauss, A. L. (1961). Images of the American city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
93. Strauss, A. L. (1969). Mirrors and masks: The search for identity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. (Original work published 1959)
94. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
95. Strauss, A. L. (1995). Notes on the nature and development of general theories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 7-18.
96. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
97. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
98. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99. Tanggaard, L. (2009). The research interview as a dialogical context for the production of social life and personal narratives. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(9), 1498-1515.
100. Teti, M., Bowleg, L., Cole, R., Lloyd, L., Rubinstein, S., Spencer, S., et al. (2010). A mixed methods evaluation of the effect of the protect and respect intervention on the condom use and disclosure practices of women living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behavior, 14, 567-579.
101. Thornberg, R. (2010a). School children's social representations on bullying causes. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 311-327.
102. Thornberg, R. (2010b). A student in distress: Moral frames and bystander behavior in school. The Elementary School Journal, 110(4), 585-608.
103. van den Hoonaard, W. C. (1997). Working with sensitizing concepts: Analytical field research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
104. Warren, C. A. B., & Williams, K. N. (2008). Interviewing elderly residents in assisted living. Qualitative Sociology, 31(4), 407-424.
105. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London, England: Sage.
106. Witz, K. G. (2006). The participant as ally and essentialist portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 246-268.
107. Yamazaki, H., Slingsby, B. T., Takahashi, M., Hayashi, Y., Sugimori, H., & Nakayama, T. (2009). Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: A critical review. BioScience Trends, 3, 202-209.