The relation between assessment for learning and elementary students' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 33-46

  Baas, Diana ^a   Castelijns, Jos ^b   Vermeulen, Marjan ^c   Martens, Rob ^c   Segers, Mien ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b De Kempel Teacher Education Institute   (Netherlands)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment for Learning; Cognitivestrategies; Elementary education; Metacognitive strategies

Indexed keywords

CHILD; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; SCHOOL TEACHER; STUDENT;

CHILD; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; SCHOOL TEACHERS; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84923036359     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: 20448279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12058     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 94-101. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.94
2. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=3.
3. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved from http://assessmentreformgroup.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/10principles_english.pdf
4. Ayala, C. C., Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Tomita, M. K. (2008). From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment suites. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 315-334. doi:10.1080/08957340802347787
5. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 5-25. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
6. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BM Software.
7. Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
8. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality at university (3rd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
9. Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., & Ridgway, J. (2006). A learning integrated assessment system. Educational Research Review, 1, 61-67. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.001
10. Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., Shilton, H., & Shahaf-Barzilay, R. (2009). Cycles of inquiry: Formative assessment in service of learning in classrooms and in school-based professional communities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 130-149. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.01.001
11. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for Learning in the classroom. London: GL Assessment.
12. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7-73. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
13. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: GL Assessment.
14. Black, P., & Wiliam, W. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
15. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
16. Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where are we today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
17. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199-231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
18. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245
19. Choy, J. L. F., O'Grady, G., & Rotgans, J. I. (2012). Is the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) a good predictor of academic achievement? Examining the mediating role of achievement-related classroom behaviours. Instructional Science, 40, 159-172. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9171-8
20. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205-249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
21. Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. P. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101-129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
22. Dinsmore, D. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2012). A critical discussion of deep and surface processing: What it means, how it is measured, the role of context, and model specification. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 499-567. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9198-7
23. Dunn, K.E., & Mulvenon, S.W. (2009). A critical review of research evidence on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14. Retrieved from http://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v14n7.pdf
24. Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change Students' perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36, 431-443. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7
25. Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between Students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 327-341. doi:10.1007/BF03173560
26. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 4, 365-379. doi:10.1080/0969594970040304
27. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
28. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
29. Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: Instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20, 18-29. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.12.001
30. Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28-37. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
31. Klenowski, V. (2009). Assessment for Learning revisited: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16, 263-268. doi:10.1080/09695940903319646
32. Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121-133. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
33. Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 93-103. doi:10.1007/BF02504930
34. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Academic Press.
35. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
36. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
37. Paris, S. G., & Newman, R. S. (1990). Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 87-102. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7
38. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
39. Pat-El, R. J., Tillema, H., Segers, M., & Vedder, P. (2013). Validation of Assessment for Learning questionnaires for teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 98-113. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02057.x
40. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 715-729. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715
41. Perry, N. E., & VandeKamp, K. J. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children's development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 821-843. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00052-5
42. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
43. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
44. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
45. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 77-84. doi:10.1080/0969595980050104
46. Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
47. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on Students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-472. doi:10.1023/A:1003196224280
48. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795
49. Smith, K. (2011). Professional development of teachers - A prerequisite for AfL to be successfully implemented in the classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 55-61. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.005
50. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment. Effects on Students' self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551-567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001
51. Vandevelde, S., Van Keer, H., & Rosseel, Y. (2013). Measuring the complexity of upper primary school children's self-regulated learning: A multi-component approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 407-425. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.09.002
52. Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition Learning, 6, 205-211. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
53. Wall, K., Higgins, S., Remedios, R., Rafferty, V., & Tiplady, L. (2013). Comparing analysis frames for visual data sets using pupil views templates to explore perspectives of learning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7, 22-42. doi:10.1177/1558689812450211
54. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 63-85. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
55. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
56. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11, 49-65. doi:10.1080/0969594042000208994
57. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327-353. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9
58. Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Young, D.B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335-359. doi:10.1080/08957340802347845
59. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
60. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
62. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614
63. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51