Biophysical Models of Protein Evolution: Understanding the Patterns of Evolutionary Sequence Divergence

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volumn 46, Issue , 2017, Pages 85-103

  Echave, Julian ^a,b   Wilke, Claus O ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SAN MARTÍN   (Argentina)

^b Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas ^*  (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary rate; Fitness landscape; Protein folding; Protein misfolding; Protein protein interaction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BIOPHYSICS; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EVOLUTION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MISFOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; THERMODYNAMICS; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC FITNESS; HUMANS; MUTATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 85019694903     PISSN: 1936122X     EISSN: 19361238     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033819     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Arenas M, Sanchez-Cobos A, Bastolla U. 2015. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic inference with selection on protein folding stability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:2195-207
2. Ashenberg O, Gong LI, Bloom JD. 2013. Mutational effects on stability are largely conserved during protein evolution. PNAS 110:21071-76
3. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. 2004. Principal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins. Proteins 58:22-30
4. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. 2006. A protein evolution model with independent sites that reproduces site-specific amino acid distributions from the Protein Data Bank. BMC Evol. Biol. 6:43
5. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO. 2006. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1751-61
6. Bloom JD, Glassman MJ. 2009. Inferring stabilizing mutations from protein phylogenies: Application to influenza hemagglutinin. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000349
7. Bloom JD, Raval A, Wilke CO. 2007. Thermodynamics of neutral protein evolution. Genetics 175:255-66
8. Bloom JD, Silberg JJ, Wilke CO, Drummond DA, Adami C, Arnold FH. 2005. Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality. PNAS 102:606-11
9. Bloom JD, Wilke CO, Arnold FH, Adami C. 2004. Stability and the evolvability of function in a model protein. Biophys. J. 86:2758-64
10. Bornberg-Bauer E, Chan HS. 1999. Modeling evolutionary landscapes: Mutational stability, topology, superfunnels in sequence space. PNAS 96:10689-94
11. Cherry JL. 2010. Expression level, evolutionary rate, the cost of expression. Genome Biol. Evol. 2:757-69
12. Choi SC, Hobolth A, Robinson DM, Kishino H, Thorne JL. 2007. Quantifying the impact of protein tertiary structure on molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1769-82
13. Deeds EJ, Ashenberg O, Shakhnovich EI. 2006. A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks. PNAS 103:311-16
14. DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL. 2005. Missense meanderings in sequence space: A biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:678-87
15. Ding F, DokholyanNV. 2006. Emergence of protein fold families through rational design. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2:725-33
16. Doud MB, Ashenberg O, Bloom JD. 2015. Site-specific amino acid preferences are mostly conserved in two closely related protein homologs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:2944-60
17. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. PNAS 102:14338-43
18. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-52
19. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2009. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10:715-24
20. Echave J, Jackson EL, Wilke CO. 2015. Relationship between protein thermodynamic constraints and variation of evolutionary rates among sites. Phys. Biol. 12:025002
21. Echave J, Spielman SJ, Wilke CO. 2016. Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17:109-21
22. England JL, Shakhnovich EI. 2003. Structural determinant of protein designability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90:218101
23. Faure G, Koonin EV. 2015. Universal distribution ofmutational effects on protein stability, uncoupling of protein robustness from sequence evolution and distinct evolutionarymodes of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins. Phys. Biol. 12:035001
24. Fornasari MS, Parisi G, Echave J. 2002. Site-specific amino acid replacement matrices from structurally constrained protein evolution simulations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:352-56
25. Fornasari MS, Parisi G, Echave J. 2007. Quaternary structure constraints on evolutionary sequence divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:349-51
26. Franzosa EA, Xia Y. 2009. Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:2387-95
27. Franzosa EA, Xia Y. 2012. Independent effects of protein core size and expression on residue-level structure-evolution relationships. PLOS ONE 7:e46602
28. Geiler-Samerotte KA, Dion MF, Budnik BA, Wang SM, Hartl DL, Drummond DA. 2011. Misfolded proteins impose a dosage-dependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. PNAS 108:680-85
29. Goldstein RA, Pollock DD. 2016. The tangled bank of amino acids. Protein Sci. 25:1354-62
30. Gout JF, Kahn D, Duret L. 2010. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, the rate of protein evolution. PLOS Genet. 6:e1000944
31. Grahnen JA, Nandakumar P, Kubelka J, Liberles DA. 2011. Biophysical and structural considerations for protein sequence evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:361
32. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. 2002. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320:369-87
33. Huang TT, Marcos ML, Hwang JK, Echave J. 2014. A mechanistic stress model of protein evolution accounts for site-specific evolutionary rates and their relationship with packing density and flexibility. BMC Evol. Biol. 14:78
34. Jack BR, Meyer AG, Echave J, Wilke CO. 2016. Functional sites induce long-range evolutionary constraints in enzymes. PLOS Biol. 14:e1002452
35. Jackson EL, Ollikainen N, Covert AW, Kortemme T, WilkeCO. 2013. Amino-acid site variability among natural and designed proteins. PeerJ 1:e211
36. Juritz EI, Palopoli N, Fornasari MS, Fernandez-Alberti S, Parisi GD. 2012. Protein conformational diversity modulates protein divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:79-87
37. Kachroo AH, Laurent JM, Yellman CM, Meyer AG, Wilke CO, Marcotte EM. 2015. Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity. Science 348:921-25
38. Kleinman CL, Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2010. Statistical potentials for improved structurally constrained evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:1546-60
39. Kumar MDS, Bava KA, Gromiha MM, Prabakaran P, Kitajima K, et al. 2006. ProTherm and ProNIT: Thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:D204-6
40. Larson SM, Ruczinski I, Davidson AR, Baker D, Plaxco KW. 2002. Residues participating in the protein folding nucleus do not exhibit preferential evolutionary conservation. J. Mol. Biol. 316:225-33
41. Liberles DA, Tisdell MD, Grahnen JA. 2011. Binding constraints on the evolution of enzymes and signalling proteins: The important role of negative pleiotropy. Proc. Biol. Sci. 278:1930-35
42. Lobkovsky AE, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. 2010. Universal distribution of protein evolution rates as a consequence of protein folding physics. PNAS 107:2983-88
43. Marcos ML, Echave J. 2015. Too packed to change: Side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution. PeerJ 3:e911
44. McCandlish DM, Epstein CL, Plotkin JB. 2015. Formal properties of the probability of fixation: Identities, inequalities and approximations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 99:98-113
45. McCandlish DM, Shah P, Plotkin JB. 2016. Epistasis and the dynamics of reversion in molecular evolution. Genetics 203:1335-51
46. McCandlish DM, Stoltzfus A. 2014. Modeling evolution using the probability of fixation: History and implications. Q. Rev. Biol. 89:225-52
47. Meyer AG, Wilke CO. 2013. Integrating sequence variation and protein structure to identify sites under selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:36-44
48. Michnick SW, Shakhnovich E. 1998. A strategy for detecting the conservation of folding-nucleus residues in protein superfamilies. Fold. Des. 3:239-51
49. Miller DW, Dill KA. 1997. Ligand binding to proteins: The binding landscape model. Protein Sci. 6:2166-79
50. Naganathan AN, Mu noz V. 2010. Insights into protein folding mechanisms from large scale analysis of mutational effects. PNAS 107:8611-16
51. Nelson ED, Grishin NV. 2016. Evolution of off-lattice model proteins under ligand binding constraints. Phys. Rev. E 94:022410
52. Ollikainen N, Kortemme T. 2013. Computational protein design quantifies structural constraints on amino acid covariation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9:e1003313
53. Parisi G, Echave J. 2001. Structural constraints and emergence of sequence patterns in protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:750-56
54. Parisi G, Echave J. 2004. The structurally constrained protein evolution model accounts for sequence patterns of the LH superfamily. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:41
55. Parisi G, Echave J. 2005. Generality of the structurally constrained protein evolution model: Assessment on representatives of the four main fold classes. Gene 345:45-53
56. Pollock DD, Thiltgen G, Goldstein RA. 2012. Amino acid coevolution induces an evolutionary Stokes shift. PNAS 109:E1352-59
57. Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M, Bastolla U. 2005. Prediction of site-specific amino acid distributions and limits of divergent evolutionary changes in protein sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:630-38
58. Ramsey DC, Scherrer MP, Zhou T, Wilke CO. 2011. The relationship between relative solvent accessibility and evolutionary rate in protein evolution. Genetics 188:479-88
59. Rastogi S, Reuter N, Liberles DA. 2006. Evaluation of models for the evolution of protein sequences and functions under structural constraint. Biophys. Chem. 124:134-44
60. Robinson D, Jones D, Kishino H, Goldman N, Thorne JL. 2003. Protein evolution with dependence among codons due to tertiary structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1692-704
61. Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Bryant D, Philippe H. 2005. Site interdependence attributed to tertiary structure in amino acid sequence evolution. Gene 347:207-17
62. Saito S, Sasai M, Yomo T. 1997. Evolution of the folding ability of proteins through functional selection. PNAS 94:11324-28
63. Sasaki TN, Sasai M. 2002. Correlation between the conformation space and the sequence space of peptide chain. J. Biol. Phys. 28:483-92
64. Scherrer MP, Meyer AG, Wilke CO. 2012. Modeling coding-sequence evolution within the context of residue solvent accessibility. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:179
65. Schymkowitz JW, Rousseau F, Martins IC, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Stricher F, Serrano L. 2005. Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. PNAS 102:10147-52
66. Sella G, Hirsh AE. 2005. The application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. PNAS 102:9541-46
67. Serohijos AWR, Lee SYR, Shakhnovich EI. 2013. Highly abundant proteins favor more stable 3D structures in yeast. Biophys. J. 104:L1-3
68. Serohijos AWR, Rimas Z, Shakhnovich EI. 2012. Protein biophysics explains why highly abundant proteins evolve slowly. Cell Rep. 2:249-56
69. Serohijos AWR, Shakhnovich EI. 2014. Contribution of selection for protein folding stability in shaping the patterns of polymorphisms in coding regions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31:165-76
70. Serohijos AWR, Shakhnovich EI. 2014. Merging molecular mechanism and evolution: Theory and computation at the interface of biophysics and evolutionary population genetics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 26:84-91
71. Shah P, McCandlish DM, Plotkin JB. 2015. Contingency and entrenchment in protein evolution under purifying selection. PNAS 112:E3226-35
72. Shakhnovich EI, Abkevich V, Ptitsyn O. 1996. Conserved residues and the mechanism of protein folding. Nature 379:96-98
73. Shakhnovich EI, Gutin AM. 1993. Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. PNAS 90:7195-99
74. Sikosek T, Chan HS. 2014. Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics. J. R. Soc. Interface 11:20140419
75. Tien MZ, Meyer AG, Sydykova DK, Spielman SJ, Wilke CO. 2013. Maximum allowed solvent accessibilites of residues in proteins. PLOS ONE 8:e80635
76. Tokuriki N, Stricher F, Schymkowitz J, Serrano L, Tawfik DS. 2007. The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J. Mol. Biol. 369:1318-32
77. Tseng YY, Liang J. 2004. Are residues in a protein folding nucleus evolutionarily conserved J. Mol. Biol. 335:869-80
78. van Nimwegen E, Crutchfield JP, Huynen M. 1999. Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. PNAS 96:9716-20
79. Wilke CO. 2004. Molecular clock in neutral protein evolution. BMC Genet. 5:25
80. Wilke CO, Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Raval A. 2005. Predicting the tolerance of proteins to random amino acid substitution. Biophys. J. 89:3714-20
81. Wilke CO, Drummond DA. 2006. Population genetics of translational robustness. Genetics 173:473-81
82. Williams PD, Pollock DD, Blackburne BP, Goldstein RA. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2:e69
83. Williams PD, Pollock DD, Goldstein RA. 2001. Evolution of functionality in lattice proteins. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 19:150-56
84. Wright S. 1988. Surfaces of selective value revisited. Am. Nat. 131:115-23
85. Yang JR, Liao BY, Zhuang SM, Zhang J. 2012. Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. PNAS 109:E831-40
86. Yang JR, Zhuang SM, Zhang J. 2010. Impact of translational error-induced and error-free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6:421
87. Yeh SW, Liu JW, Yu SH, Shih CH, Hwang JK, Echave J. 2014. Site-specific structural constraints on protein sequence evolutionary divergence: Local packing density versus solvent exposure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31:135-39
88. Yomo T, Saito S, Sasai M. 1999. Gradual development of protein-like global structures through functional selection. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:743-46
89. Zhang J, Maslov S, Shakhnovich EI. 2008. Constraints imposed by non-functional protein-protein interactions on gene expression and proteome size. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4:210
90. Zhang J, Yang JR. 2015. Determinants of the rate of protein sequence evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16:409-20