Prinicipal eigenvector of contact matrices and hydrophobicity profiles in proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 22-30

  Bastolla, Ugo ^a   Porto, Markus ^b,c,f   Roman, H Eduardo ^d   Vendruscolo, Michele ^e  

^a CENTRO DE ASTROBIOLOGÍA CSIC INTA   (Spain)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contact maps; Hydrophobicity; Protein folding; Vectorial protein space; Vectorial representation of proteins

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

PROTEIN;

HYDROPHOBICITY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 10844225367     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20240     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982;157:105-132.
2. Sweet RM, Eisenberg D. Correlation of sequence hydrophobicities measures similarity in three-dimensional protein structure. J Mol Biol 1983;171:479-488.
3. Bowie JU, Lüthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known 3-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.
4. Rost B, Sander C. Progress of 1D protein-structure prediction at last. Proteins 1995;23:295-300.
5. Bowie JU, Clarke ND, Pabo CO, Sauer RT. Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins 1990;7:257-264.
6. Wilmanns M, Eisenberg D. Three-dimensional profiles from residue-pair preferences: identification of sequences with beta/alpha-barrel fold. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:1379-1383.
7. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J Mol Biol 1995;252:709-720.
8. Holm L, Sander C. Parser for protein folding units. Proteins 1994;19:256-268.
9. Kannan N, Vishveshwara S. Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. J Mol Biol 1999;292:441-464.
10. Kannan N, Vishveshwara S. Aromatic clusters: A determinant of thermal stability of thermophilic proteins. Prot Eng 2000;13:753-761.
11. Porto M, Bastolla U, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. Reconstruction of protein structures from a vectorial representation. Phys Rev Lett 2004;92:1-14.
12. Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer ELL. The PFAM contribution to the annual NAR database issue. Nucl Ac Res 2000;28:263-266.
13. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273: 595-602.
14. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. Connectivity of neutral networks, overdispersion, and structural conservation in protein evolution. J Mol Evol 2003;56:243-254.
15. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo M. Lack of self-averaging in neutral evolution of proteins. Phys Rev Lett 2002;89: 208101/1-208101/4.
16. Bastolla U, Porto M, Roman HE, Vendruscolo, M. Statistical properties of neutral evolution. J Mol Evol 2003;57:S103-S119.
17. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:10915-10519.
18. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. One fold with many functions: The evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures, and functions, J Mol Biol 2002;321:741-765.
19. Bollobás, B. Modern graph theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin. 1998.
20. Bastolla U, Farwer J, Knapp EW, Vendruscolo M. How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the protein data bank. Proteins 2001;44:79-96.
21. Bastolla U, Vendruscolo M, Knapp EW. A statistical mechanical method to optimize energy functions for protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:3977-3981.
22. Li H, Tang C, Wingreen NS. Nature of driving force for protein folding: A result from analyzing the statistical potential. Phys Rev Lett 1997;79:765-768.
23. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective inter-residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
24. Fauchere JL, Pliska V. Hydrophobic parameters of amino acid side chain from the partitioning N-acetyl amino acid amides. Eur J Med Chem 1983;18:369-375.
25. Bringelson JD, Wolynes PG. Spin-glasses and the statistical-mechanics of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84: 7524-7528.
26. Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:4918-4922.
27. Abkevich VI, Gutin AM, Shakhnovich EI. Free energy landscapes for protein folding kinetics-intermediates, traps and multiple pathways in theory and lattice model simulations. J Chem Phys 1994;101:6052-6062.
28. Gutin AM, Abkevich VI, Shakhnovich EI. Evolution-like selection of fast-folding model proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92: 1282-1286.
29. Klimov DK, Thirumalai D. Factors governing the foldability of proteins. Proteins 1996;26:411-441.
30. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press. 1983.
31. Smith TF, Waterman MS, Fitch WM. Comparative biosequence metrics. J Mol Evol 1981;18:38-46.
32. Kohel P. Protein structures similarities. Curr Op Str Biol 2001;11: 348-353.
33. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
34. Wallin S, Farwer J, Bastolla U. Testing Distance Measures using Continuous and Discrete Protein Models. Proteins 2003;50:144-157.
35. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes Prot Sci 1999;8:361-369.
36. Cline MS, Karplus K, Lathrop RH, Smith TF, Rogers RG Jr, Haussler D. Information-theoretic dissection of pairwise contact potentials. Proteins 2002;49:7-14.
37. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Quantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability, Proteins 2004;54:315-322.
38. Rost B. Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. Fol Des 1997;2:S19-S24.
39. Bastolla U, Moya A, Viguera E, van Ham RCHJ. Genomic determinants of protein folding thermodynamics. Submitted.