Quantifying the impact of protein tertiary structure on molecular evolution

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1769-1782

  Choi, Sang Chul ^a   Hobolth, Asger ^a   Robinson, Douglas M ^a,b   Kishino, Hirohisa ^c   Thorne, Jeffrey L ^a,d  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayes factor; Gene Ontology; MCMC; Molecular evolution; Protein structure impact

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 34547809931     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm097     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. (20 co-authors). 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 25:25-29.
2. Berg J, Willmann S, Lässig M. 2004. Adaptive evolution of transcription factor binding sites. BMC Evol Biol. 4:42.
3. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-242.
4. Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilkie CO. 2006. Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1751-1761.
5. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, et al. (12 co-authors). 2003. The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:365-370.
6. Camon E, Magrane M, Barrell D, Lee V, Dimmer E, Maslen J, Binns D, Harte N, Lopez R, Apweiler R. 2004. The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:D262-266.
7. Cao Y, Adachi J, Janke A, Pääbo S, Hasegawa M. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J Mol Evol. 39:519-527.
8. Chib S. 1995. Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. J Am Stat Assoc. 90:1313-1321.
9. Chib S, Jeliazkov I. 2001. Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis-Hastings output. J Am Stat Assoc. 96:270-281.
10. Chothia C, Lesk AM. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823-826.
11. Christensen O, Hobolth A, Jensen J. 2005. Pseudo-likelihood analysis of codon substitution models with neighbor-dependent rates. J Comput Biol. 12:1166-1182.
12. Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilkie CO. 2005. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:327-337.
13. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
14. Flores TP, Orengo CA, Moss DS, Thornton JM. 1993. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 2:1811-1826.
15. Galassi M, Davies J, Theiler J, Gough B, Jungman G, Booth M, Rossi F. 2005. GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual. Network Theory Ltd.
16. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. 2003. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
17. Goldman N, Whelan S. 2002. A novel use of equilibrium frequencies in models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1821-1831.
18. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11:725-736.
19. Hastings WK. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika. 57:97-109.
20. Hobohm U, Scharf M, Schneider R, Sander C. 1992. Selection of a representative set of structures from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. Protein Sci. 1:409-417.
21. Hwang DG, Green P. 2004. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:13994-14001.
22. Jensen JL, Pedersen AMK. 2000. Probabilistic models of DNA sequence evolution with context dependent rates of substitution. Adv Appl Probab. 32:499-517.
23. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:86-89.
24. Jones DT, Thornton JM. 1996. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struc Biol. 6:210-216.
25. Kabsch W, Sander C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 22:2577-2637.
26. Kanz C, Aldebert P, Althorpe N, et al. (32 co-authors). 2005. The EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:D29-D33.
27. Kelley LA, Sutcliffe MJ. 1997. OLDERADO: On-line database of ensemble representatives and domains. Protein Sci. 6:2628-2630.
28. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2006. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst Biol. 55:195-207.
29. Martin AC. 2005. Mapping PDB chains to UniProtKB entries. Bioinformatics. 21:4297-4301.
30. Melo F, Sánchez R, Sali A. 2002. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. Protein Sci. 11:430-448.
31. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys. 21:1087-1092.
32. Muse SV, Gaut BS. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol. 11:715-724.
33. Mustonen V, Lässig M. 2005. Evolutionary population genetics of promoters: predicting binding sites and functional phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 102:15936-15941.
34. Nelder JA, Mead R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 7:308-313.
35. Nielsen R, Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics. 148:929-936.
36. Pedersen AMK, Jensen JL. 2001. A dependent-rates model and an MCMC-based methodology for the maximum-likelihood analysis of sequences with overlapping reading frames. Mol Biol Evol. 18:763-776.
37. Pedersen JS, Forsberg R, Meyer IM, Hein J. 2004. An evolutionary model for protein-coding regions with conserved RNA structure. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1913-1922.
38. Rambaut A, Drummond A. 2003. Tracer v1.3 URL http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk.
39. Robinson DM. 2003. D.R. EVOL: Three Dimensional Realistic Evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Bioinformatics. North Carolina State University.
40. Robinson DM, Jones DT, Kishino H, Goldman N, Thorne JL. 2003. Protein evolution with dependence among codons due to tertiary structure. Mol Biol Evol. 20:1692-1704.
41. Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Bryant D, Philippe H. 2005. Site interdependence attributed to tertiary structure in amino acid sequence evolution. Gene. 347:207-217.
42. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2006. Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1762-1775.
43. Russell RB, Saqi MAS, Sayle RA, Bates PA, Sternberg MJE. 1997. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol. 269:423-439.
44. Siepel A, Haussler D. 2004. Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 21:468-488.
45. Stein C. 1956. Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate distribution. Proc Third Berkeley Symp Math Statist Prob. 1:197-206.
46. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 39:306-314.
47. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. J Mol Evol. 46:409-418.
48. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol Biol Evol. 19:908-917.
49. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AMK. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 155:431-449.
50. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Hasegawa M. 1998. Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 15:1600-1611.
51. Yang Z, Swanson WJ. 2002. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol Biol Evol. 19:49-57.
52. Yu J, Thorne JL. 2006a. Dependence among sites in RNA evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1525-1537.
53. Yu J, Thorne JL. 2006b. Testing for spatial clustering of amino acid replacements within protein tertiary structure. J Mol Evol. 62:682-692.