Amino acid coevolution induces an evolutionary Stokes shift

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 21, 2012, Pages

  Pollock, David D ^a   Thiltgen, Grant ^b   Goldstein, Richard A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACID PHOSPHATASE TARTRATE RESISTANT ISOENZYME; AMINO ACID;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; HYDROPHOBICITY; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTUM YIELD; SPECTROSCOPY;

ACID PHOSPHATASE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO ACIDS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GLYCOPROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84861422981     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120084109     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Pollock DD, Bruno WJ (2000) Assessing an unknown evolutionary process: Effect of increasing site-specific knowledge through taxon addition. Mol Biol Evol 17:1854-1858.
2. Castoe TA, et al. (2009) Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8986-8991.
3. Burger L, van Nimwegen E (2010) Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000633.
4. Dimmic MW, Hubisz MJ, Bustamante CD, Nielsen R (2005) Detecting coevolving amino acid sites using Bayesian mutational mapping. Bioinformatics 21(Suppl 1):i126-i135. (Pubitemid 41794482)
5. Göbel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18:309-317. (Pubitemid 24111530)
6. Jones DT, Buchan DW, Cozzetto D, Pontil M (2012) PSICOV: Precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 28:184-190.
7. Marks DS, et al. (2011) Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 6:e28766.
8. Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N (1999) Coevolving protein residues: Maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 287:187-198. (Pubitemid 29134806)
9. Taylor WR, Jones DT, Sadowski MI (2012) Protein topology from predicted residue contacts. Protein Sci 21:299-305.
10. Wang ZO, Pollock DD (2005) Context dependence and coevolution among amino acid residues in proteins. Methods Enzymol 395:779-790. (Pubitemid 40754397)
11. Wang ZO, Pollock DD (2007) Coevolutionary patterns in cytochrome c oxidase subunit I depend on structural and functional context. J Mol Evol 65:485-495. (Pubitemid 350115431)
12. Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Bryant D, Philippe H (2005) Site interdependence attributed to tertiary structure in amino acid sequence evolution. Gene 347:207-217. (Pubitemid 40403760)
13. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N (2006) Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23:1762-1775. (Pubitemid 44309770)
14. Dayhoff M, Schwartz R, Orcutt B (1978) A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, ed Dayhoff M(National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring, MD), pp 345-352.
15. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8:275-282.
16. Whelan S, Goldman N (2001) A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol 18:691-699. (Pubitemid 32372940)
17. Overington J, Donnelly D, Johnson MS, Sali A, Blundell TL (1992) Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: Tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci 1:216-226. (Pubitemid 23007288)
18. Koshi JM, Goldstein RA (1995) Context-dependent optimal substitution matrices. Protein Eng 8:641-645.
19. Thorne JL, Goldman N, Jones DT (1996) Combining protein evolution and secondary structure. Mol Biol Evol 13:666-673. (Pubitemid 26131888)
20. Koshi JM, Goldstein RA (1998) Models of natural mutations including site heterogeneity. Proteins 32:289-295. (Pubitemid 28360825)
21. Lartillot N, Philippe H (2004) A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol 21:1095-1109. (Pubitemid 38658218)
22. Pagel M, Meade A (2004) A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst Biol 53:571-581. (Pubitemid 39290200)
23. Fisher R (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford).
24. Halpern AL, Bruno WJ (1998) Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: Modeling site-specific residue frequencies. Mol Biol Evol 15:910-917. (Pubitemid 28321889)
25. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N (2010) Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4629-4634.
26. Sella G, Hirsh AE (2005) The application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9541-9546. (Pubitemid 40981717)
27. Tamuri AU, Dos Reis M, Goldstein RA (2012) Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data using sitewise mutation-selection models. Genetics 190:1101-1115.
28. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Harper & Row, New York).
29. Kimura M (1957) Some problems of stochastic processes in genetics. Ann Math Stat 28:882-901.
30. Kimura M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47:713-719.
31. Kellogg EH, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D (2011) Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 79:830-838.
32. Galtier N (2001) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol Biol Evol 18:866-873.
33. Penny D, McComish BJ, Charleston MA, Hendy MD (2001) Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: The covarion model of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol 53:711-723. (Pubitemid 32989425)
34. Jensen JL, Pedersen AMK (2000) Probabilistic models of DNA sequence evolution with context dependent rates of substitution. Adv Appl Probab 32:499-517.
35. Siepel A, Haussler D (2004) Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 21:468-488. (Pubitemid 38339664)
36. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L (2005) Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59:1165-1174. (Pubitemid 40870413)
37. Orr HA, Turelli M (2001) The evolution of postzygotic isolation: Accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085-1094. (Pubitemid 32665219)
38. Turelli M, Orr HA (2000) Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154:1663-1679. (Pubitemid 30211249)
39. Unckless RL, Orr HA (2009) Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities and adaptation to a shared environment. Heredity (Edinb) 102:214-217.
40. Kulathinal RJ, Bettencourt BR, Hartl DL (2004) Compensated deleterious mutations in insect genomes. Science 306:1553-1554. (Pubitemid 39564950)
41. Goldstein RA (2011) The evolution and evolutionary consequences of marginal thermostability in proteins. Proteins 79:1396-1407.
42. Williams PD, Pollock DD, Blackburne BP, Goldstein RA (2006) Assessing the accuracy of ancestral protein reconstruction methods. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e69.
43. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1985) Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18:534-552.
44. Lindqvist Y, Johansson E, Kaija H, Vihko P, Schneider G (1999) Three-dimensional structure of a mammalian purple acid phosphatase at 2.2 A resolution with a mu-(hydr)oxo bridged di-iron center. J Mol Biol 291:135-147. (Pubitemid 29391410)
45. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111-120.
46. Klafter J, Shlesinger MF (1986) On the relationship among three theories of relaxation in disordered systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:848-851.